Category Archives: Qualified immunity

D.Minn.: PO knowing def’s history saw a bulge in def’s pocket, and this was justification for a search

Defendant was on supervised release. The officer “then saw a bulge in Becerra’s pocket that he suspected could be a weapon. [He thus] had probable cause at the time he arrested Becerra to believe that Becerra was violating his supervised … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Minn.: PO knowing def’s history saw a bulge in def’s pocket, and this was justification for a search

KS: Stop-and-frisk was a factually justified “discretionary function” and the officer couldn’t be sued

With a due comparison to Det. Martin McFadden’s actions in observing John W. Terry and Richard D. Chilton in Terry v. Ohio, the officer on the totality was justified in inquiring of defendant what he was doing. Plaintiff wasn’t arrested, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on KS: Stop-and-frisk was a factually justified “discretionary function” and the officer couldn’t be sued

CA6: No reasonable officer could conclude there was PC for pft’s arrest

“When reviewing the information known to Seidl at the time of Zavatson’s arrest, we conclude that no reasonable officer could have believed, based on anything more than speculation, that Zavatson had committed the purported theft. As an initial matter, there … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: No reasonable officer could conclude there was PC for pft’s arrest

CA10: Defs did not violate clearly established 4A law by accessing the Utah Controlled Substance Database on plaintiffs’ prescriptions

Defendants did not violate clearly established Fourth Amendment law by accessing the Utah Controlled Substance Database on plaintiffs’ prescriptions (and the Fourth Amendment claim goes undecided). Pyle v. Woods, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 21713 (10th Cir. Nov. 1, 2017):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Administrative search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Defs did not violate clearly established 4A law by accessing the Utah Controlled Substance Database on plaintiffs’ prescriptions

CA5: Search of wrong house leads to liability: “An officer who makes no reasonable effort to correctly identify the place to be searched does not get immunity merely because someone else was leading the search.”

Sloppy police work leading to a search of the wrong house on a warrant leads to loss of qualified immunity: “An officer who makes no reasonable effort to correctly identify the place to be searched does not get immunity merely … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Particularity, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Search of wrong house leads to liability: “An officer who makes no reasonable effort to correctly identify the place to be searched does not get immunity merely because someone else was leading the search.”

CA9: Ptf has to plead well established law was violated for § 1983

Plaintiff has the burden of pleading well established law was violated by defendants’ conduct. Here, the law was “murky” on whether the actions of the plaintiff was probable cause. Thus, the officers get qualified immunity. Burgan v. Nixon, 2017 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Ptf has to plead well established law was violated for § 1983

CA2: Correcting the alleged false statements in affidavit still leaves PC so officials have QI

Deleting the allegedly false information from the affidavit for search warrant leaving it as a “corrected” affidavit under Franks, there still was a fair probability for probable cause. That there might be other explanations doesn’t undermine probable cause. Therefore, defendants … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA2: Correcting the alleged false statements in affidavit still leaves PC so officials have QI

CA1: QI for excessive force doesn’t require a case exactly on point; Garner is close enough for a jury to find liability

The district court denied qualified immunity to an officer who shot the victim in the head with an AR-15 without warning for allegedly brandishing a firearm. The victim had been wandering in and out of his house with a gun … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA1: QI for excessive force doesn’t require a case exactly on point; Garner is close enough for a jury to find liability

SCOTUSBlog: Argument preview: Parties, probable cause and the Fourth Amendment (DC v. Wesby)

SCOTUSBlog: Argument preview: Parties, probable cause and the Fourth Amendment (DC v. Wesby) by Amy Howe: When District of Columbia police officers Andre Parker and Anthony Campanale responded to reports of unauthorized goings-on at a supposedly vacant home nearly a … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUSBlog: Argument preview: Parties, probable cause and the Fourth Amendment (DC v. Wesby)

CA9: Arrest on mistaken identity gets QI, but continuing the arrest after learning mistake doesn’t; Summers doesn’t apply to arrest warrants

Plaintiff’s initial arrest on mistaken identity was not in violation of clearly established law, and, thus, the officers had qualified immunity. After learning, however, that plaintiff was not the person sought, officers did violate the Fourth Amendment by keeping him … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Arrest on mistaken identity gets QI, but continuing the arrest after learning mistake doesn’t; Summers doesn’t apply to arrest warrants

CA6: Officer in § 1983 case didn’t show basis for warrantless entry; QI erroneously granted

Crediting the plaintiffs’ complaint and the proof thus far, the defendant officer did not show an excuse for dispensing with the warrant requirement for a warrantless entry into the plaintiffs’ home. Thus, summary judgment on qualified immunity was erroneously granted … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Officer in § 1983 case didn’t show basis for warrantless entry; QI erroneously granted

CA1: There was no “doorway arrest” under Santana when ptf was behind a locked door the entire time

Police entered plaintiff’s house without a warrant to arrest him. An hour had passed, and any exigency was long gone. As for whether this could be a “doorway arrest” under Santana, that too is rejected because plaintiff was behind a … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA1: There was no “doorway arrest” under Santana when ptf was behind a locked door the entire time

CA7: RS man was casing a store for robbery made it reasonable to believe he was armed for a frisk

The cases that apply to plaintiff’s Terry stop don’t necessarily apply to plaintiff’s frisk. Here, the precedents were too dissimilar, and defendants are entitled to qualified immunity for the frisk. Plaintiff was a “suspicious person” believed to be casing a … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA7: RS man was casing a store for robbery made it reasonable to believe he was armed for a frisk

CA6: Jail group strip searches invasive, but penologically justified; ptf must answer defs’ proffered justification

While group strip searches at a jail are invasive, there is a penological justification offered that plaintiff doesn’t answer. There is no clearly established law that these are unreasonable. “The issue we face is whether periodically conducting group strip searches … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Strip search | Comments Off on CA6: Jail group strip searches invasive, but penologically justified; ptf must answer defs’ proffered justification

CA5: Bodycam video showed that this fatal shooting was apparently justified, and that essentially made credibility of the officer irrelevant

In this § 1983 action against a former deputy sheriff, which alleged excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment, the factual issues identified by the district court on summary judgment were immaterial in light of undisputed filmed facts of … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Body searches, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Bodycam video showed that this fatal shooting was apparently justified, and that essentially made credibility of the officer irrelevant

CA5: Ptf in a 4A § 1983 case has to plead violation of a “clearly established right” to get over QI in complaint

Although an arrestee adequately alleged that members of a parish council and sheriff’s office maliciously conspired to prosecute him under an unconstitutional statute in retaliation for online comments about council members, his right was not clearly established because there was … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Ptf in a 4A § 1983 case has to plead violation of a “clearly established right” to get over QI in complaint

CA9: § 1983 Franks violation: Ignoring alleged false statements still leaves PC

A search warrant was issued for alleged violations of the building code. Ignoring any alleged false statements that led to issuance of the search warrant, there still was probable cause. Gunnels v. Kenny, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 13204 (6th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: § 1983 Franks violation: Ignoring alleged false statements still leaves PC

CA11: Punching ptf in the face because of apparent threat to officer was QI

Punching plaintiff in the face was objectively reasonable on these facts, and the officer is entitled to qualified immunity. “Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Avery, Davis saw a brawl break out between two groups of young … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Punching ptf in the face because of apparent threat to officer was QI

CA3: Ptfs dismissed their 4A claims to appeal 1A claim of right to video police in action, and they prevailed

There is a First Amendment right to video or photograph the police doing their jobs. Plaintiffs were arrested for doing that, despite a city policy saying it was legal, and the district court ruled against them on the First Amendment … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA3: Ptfs dismissed their 4A claims to appeal 1A claim of right to video police in action, and they prevailed

CA5: Video of police shooting shows it was justified, so QI shown

Parents alleged Fourth Amendment violations under § 1983 in the fatal shooting of their son by a police officer. Based upon a bystander’s video of the incident, a reasonable officer in defendant’s position could have concluded that the son posed … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Video of police shooting shows it was justified, so QI shown