Category Archives: Qualified immunity

SCOTUS: QI immunity granted where there was arguable PC on the totality for arrests and no case in point saying there wasn’t

On the totality of circumstances, it was reasonable to infer probable cause to arrest plaintiffs for unlawful entry for being in an otherwise vacant building for a party. The actions of the partygoers suggested they knew they had no right … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on SCOTUS: QI immunity granted where there was arguable PC on the totality for arrests and no case in point saying there wasn’t

N.D.Ga.: Administrative search exception doesn’t apply to a motorcycle club that isn’t remotely a “closely regulated business”

The administrative search exception under Atlanta city ordinance doesn’t apply to a motorcycle club that isn’t remotely a “closely regulated business.” Summary judgment for plaintiffs granted. Brown v. City of Atlanta, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6222 (N.D. Ga. Jan. 9, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Administrative search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Administrative search exception doesn’t apply to a motorcycle club that isn’t remotely a “closely regulated business”

Albuquerque Journal: Gov. wants to grant immunity to police

Albuquerque Journal: Gov. wants to grant immunity to police by Dan Boyd:

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Albuquerque Journal: Gov. wants to grant immunity to police

CA10: Franks doesn’t apply to private actors providing false information to LEOs

Even assuming private volunteer animal cruelty investigators provided false information that was used to get search warrants issued for plaintiffs’ property for evidence of cockfighting, qualified immunity applies because no case holds that the Franks doctrine applies to a private … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Franks doesn’t apply to private actors providing false information to LEOs

CA4: Officer who obtained court order for minor ptf to be detained and to get an erection so police could photograph it gets no QI; this isn’t remotely reasonable

Plaintiff was a 17 year old that allegedly sent a picture of his erection to his 15 year old girlfriend. Defendant obtained a court order for plaintiff to be transported to a juvenile detention center to masturbate to get an … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Body searches, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA4: Officer who obtained court order for minor ptf to be detained and to get an erection so police could photograph it gets no QI; this isn’t remotely reasonable

D.Minn.: PO knowing def’s history saw a bulge in def’s pocket, and this was justification for a search

Defendant was on supervised release. The officer “then saw a bulge in Becerra’s pocket that he suspected could be a weapon. [He thus] had probable cause at the time he arrested Becerra to believe that Becerra was violating his supervised … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Minn.: PO knowing def’s history saw a bulge in def’s pocket, and this was justification for a search

KS: Stop-and-frisk was a factually justified “discretionary function” and the officer couldn’t be sued

With a due comparison to Det. Martin McFadden’s actions in observing John W. Terry and Richard D. Chilton in Terry v. Ohio, the officer on the totality was justified in inquiring of defendant what he was doing. Plaintiff wasn’t arrested, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on KS: Stop-and-frisk was a factually justified “discretionary function” and the officer couldn’t be sued

CA6: No reasonable officer could conclude there was PC for pft’s arrest

“When reviewing the information known to Seidl at the time of Zavatson’s arrest, we conclude that no reasonable officer could have believed, based on anything more than speculation, that Zavatson had committed the purported theft. As an initial matter, there … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: No reasonable officer could conclude there was PC for pft’s arrest

CA10: Defs did not violate clearly established 4A law by accessing the Utah Controlled Substance Database on plaintiffs’ prescriptions

Defendants did not violate clearly established Fourth Amendment law by accessing the Utah Controlled Substance Database on plaintiffs’ prescriptions (and the Fourth Amendment claim goes undecided). Pyle v. Woods, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 21713 (10th Cir. Nov. 1, 2017):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Administrative search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Defs did not violate clearly established 4A law by accessing the Utah Controlled Substance Database on plaintiffs’ prescriptions

CA5: Search of wrong house leads to liability: “An officer who makes no reasonable effort to correctly identify the place to be searched does not get immunity merely because someone else was leading the search.”

Sloppy police work leading to a search of the wrong house on a warrant leads to loss of qualified immunity: “An officer who makes no reasonable effort to correctly identify the place to be searched does not get immunity merely … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Particularity, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Search of wrong house leads to liability: “An officer who makes no reasonable effort to correctly identify the place to be searched does not get immunity merely because someone else was leading the search.”

CA9: Ptf has to plead well established law was violated for § 1983

Plaintiff has the burden of pleading well established law was violated by defendants’ conduct. Here, the law was “murky” on whether the actions of the plaintiff was probable cause. Thus, the officers get qualified immunity. Burgan v. Nixon, 2017 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Ptf has to plead well established law was violated for § 1983

CA2: Correcting the alleged false statements in affidavit still leaves PC so officials have QI

Deleting the allegedly false information from the affidavit for search warrant leaving it as a “corrected” affidavit under Franks, there still was a fair probability for probable cause. That there might be other explanations doesn’t undermine probable cause. Therefore, defendants … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA2: Correcting the alleged false statements in affidavit still leaves PC so officials have QI

CA1: QI for excessive force doesn’t require a case exactly on point; Garner is close enough for a jury to find liability

The district court denied qualified immunity to an officer who shot the victim in the head with an AR-15 without warning for allegedly brandishing a firearm. The victim had been wandering in and out of his house with a gun … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA1: QI for excessive force doesn’t require a case exactly on point; Garner is close enough for a jury to find liability

SCOTUSBlog: Argument preview: Parties, probable cause and the Fourth Amendment (DC v. Wesby)

SCOTUSBlog: Argument preview: Parties, probable cause and the Fourth Amendment (DC v. Wesby) by Amy Howe: When District of Columbia police officers Andre Parker and Anthony Campanale responded to reports of unauthorized goings-on at a supposedly vacant home nearly a … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUSBlog: Argument preview: Parties, probable cause and the Fourth Amendment (DC v. Wesby)

CA9: Arrest on mistaken identity gets QI, but continuing the arrest after learning mistake doesn’t; Summers doesn’t apply to arrest warrants

Plaintiff’s initial arrest on mistaken identity was not in violation of clearly established law, and, thus, the officers had qualified immunity. After learning, however, that plaintiff was not the person sought, officers did violate the Fourth Amendment by keeping him … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Arrest on mistaken identity gets QI, but continuing the arrest after learning mistake doesn’t; Summers doesn’t apply to arrest warrants

CA6: Officer in § 1983 case didn’t show basis for warrantless entry; QI erroneously granted

Crediting the plaintiffs’ complaint and the proof thus far, the defendant officer did not show an excuse for dispensing with the warrant requirement for a warrantless entry into the plaintiffs’ home. Thus, summary judgment on qualified immunity was erroneously granted … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Officer in § 1983 case didn’t show basis for warrantless entry; QI erroneously granted

CA1: There was no “doorway arrest” under Santana when ptf was behind a locked door the entire time

Police entered plaintiff’s house without a warrant to arrest him. An hour had passed, and any exigency was long gone. As for whether this could be a “doorway arrest” under Santana, that too is rejected because plaintiff was behind a … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA1: There was no “doorway arrest” under Santana when ptf was behind a locked door the entire time

CA7: RS man was casing a store for robbery made it reasonable to believe he was armed for a frisk

The cases that apply to plaintiff’s Terry stop don’t necessarily apply to plaintiff’s frisk. Here, the precedents were too dissimilar, and defendants are entitled to qualified immunity for the frisk. Plaintiff was a “suspicious person” believed to be casing a … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA7: RS man was casing a store for robbery made it reasonable to believe he was armed for a frisk

CA6: Jail group strip searches invasive, but penologically justified; ptf must answer defs’ proffered justification

While group strip searches at a jail are invasive, there is a penological justification offered that plaintiff doesn’t answer. There is no clearly established law that these are unreasonable. “The issue we face is whether periodically conducting group strip searches … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Strip search | Comments Off on CA6: Jail group strip searches invasive, but penologically justified; ptf must answer defs’ proffered justification

CA5: Bodycam video showed that this fatal shooting was apparently justified, and that essentially made credibility of the officer irrelevant

In this § 1983 action against a former deputy sheriff, which alleged excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment, the factual issues identified by the district court on summary judgment were immaterial in light of undisputed filmed facts of … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Body searches, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Bodycam video showed that this fatal shooting was apparently justified, and that essentially made credibility of the officer irrelevant