Category Archives: Qualified immunity

UT: Stop based on query to Insure-Rite database was with RS despite database being updated biweekly

Defendant was stopped because the Utah Criminal Justice Information System querying the Insure-Rite database showed he had no car insurance. Once stopped, he admitted he didn’t have a DL either. Then, outstanding warrants were found. Defendant’s claim the Insure-Rite database … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on UT: Stop based on query to Insure-Rite database was with RS despite database being updated biweekly

CA6: It is settled that tenants have a REP in an interior hallway open only to them

The district court erred in granting qualified immunity to the officers who entered a hallway that was associated with only one apartment that decedent clearly had a reasonable expectation of privacy in. The law is settled in this circuit. Decedent … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA6: It is settled that tenants have a REP in an interior hallway open only to them

CA9: Protective sweep of house after medical emergency at front door unjustified

Officers responded to a medical emergency at the entryway of defendant’s house. They ended up conducting a protective sweep for which there was no justification whatsoever. The firearm found in the protective sweep is suppressed. United States v. Gonzalez-Martin, 2020 … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Protective sweep of house after medical emergency at front door unjustified

Cato@liberty: Supreme Court Will Soon Decide Whether To Reconsider Qualified Immunity

Cato@liberty: Supreme Court Will Soon Decide Whether To Reconsider Qualified Immunity by Jay Schweikert:

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Cato@liberty: Supreme Court Will Soon Decide Whether To Reconsider Qualified Immunity

E.D.Va.: No RS at point in stop where officer asked about weapons and for consent; suppressed

There was no reasonable suspicion to extend the stop for the officer’s questions about weapons and consent to search. There was no probable cause for the automobile exception to apply, and the product of the search can’t justify it. Suppression … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: No RS at point in stop where officer asked about weapons and for consent; suppressed

KY: After DL found suspended, stop can be extended

When defendant was stopped and found to have a suspended license, the normal incidents of a traffic stop are accordingly extended, and that didn’t make waiting for a drug dog unreasonable. Olmeda v. Commonwealth, 2020 Ky. App. LEXIS 40 (Apr. … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on KY: After DL found suspended, stop can be extended

E.D.Ky.: Failure to present issue before USMJ waives it

Defendant’s new issue of lack of consent wasn’t presented before the USMJ, so it can’t be raised in the objections. United States v. Allen, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57604 (E.D. Ky. Apr. 2, 2020). “Hunt has not shown that Glenn … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Standards of review | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Failure to present issue before USMJ waives it

CA6: Social workers’ in-school interviews of children violated 4A, but law not clearly established

Social workers’ in-school interviews of children of a parent who tested positive for drugs violated the Fourth Amendment, but they get qualified immunity because no case holds what they did was clearly established. Schulkers v. Kammer, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Seizure | Comments Off on CA6: Social workers’ in-school interviews of children violated 4A, but law not clearly established

CA9: Use of force against autistic person posing no threat was excessive

Qualified immunity was properly denied the officer on plaintiff’s claim that the officer was alleged to have used excessive force. After seeing that plaintiff was holding only a string and certainly after learning that he was autistic, no officer of … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Use of force against autistic person posing no threat was excessive

CA8 dissent from rehearing en banc: Panel misapplied qualified immunity on use of Taser

Two judges of the Eighth Circuit dissented from denial of rehearing en banc of 944 F.3d 704 (8th Cir. Ark. Dec. 3, 2019) that the panel misapplied qualified immunity. Jackson v. Stair, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 9540 (8th Cir. Mar. … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8 dissent from rehearing en banc: Panel misapplied qualified immunity on use of Taser

Cal.3: The evidence supports the conclusion that def consented to his blood draw

Substantial evidence supported the finding that defendant consented to his blood draw. After the officer instructed her that the implied consent law required her to undergo a blood draw, defendant did not object or refuse to undergo the test, did … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Cal.3: The evidence supports the conclusion that def consented to his blood draw

S.D.Ga.: There is no per se staleness, and how is DNA stale?

There is no per se staleness. A new warrant for defendant’s DNA alleging it was previously drawn in 2005 and 2007 and matched wasn’t stale. How does DNA change? It doesn’t. United States v. Williams, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38735 … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, DNA, Good faith exception, Qualified immunity, Staleness | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: There is no per se staleness, and how is DNA stale?

N.D.Ohio: Controlled buy is PC; CI’s alleged lie isn’t Franks issue

A controlled buy was probable cause. The claim that the CI lied isn’t cognizable under Franks. United States v. Sheridan, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36163 (N.D. Ohio. Mar. 3, 2020). There were disputed questions of fact on whether it was … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Controlled buy is PC; CI’s alleged lie isn’t Franks issue

CA6: Shooting a teenager who pulled a toy gun on an officer for 2 seconds still has QI

The officer here shot a teenage boy who had a toy gun on him that looked real. He reached for it and dropped it, but reaching for it and pulling it out, even for two seconds before dropping it, was … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Shooting a teenager who pulled a toy gun on an officer for 2 seconds still has QI

CA10: Shooting a person fleeing a shooting scene without determining he was the shooter might have been unreasonable, but right not to be shot in this situation not clearly established (Really)

In a § 1983 Fourth Amendment excessive force suit, officers heard a gun shot and saw people running as a crowd left a concert. They shot and killed the decedent, and a jury could conclude that the officers unreasonably determined … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Shooting a person fleeing a shooting scene without determining he was the shooter might have been unreasonable, but right not to be shot in this situation not clearly established (Really)

CA9: Ptf stated claim for SSA CID’s unlawful entry into home

Plaintiff’s civil claim against Social Security Administration’s CID and local investigators stated a claim for unlawful entry into her home in a criminal investigation. Anh Tuyet Thai v. Saul, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 5425 (9th Cir. Feb. 19, 2020).* Plaintiff … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Ptf stated claim for SSA CID’s unlawful entry into home

CA1: Alleged overseizure of email under SW would only require partial suppression; def doesn’t identify that which was overseized

Defendant’s motion to suppress electronic data acquired by a Rule 41(e)(2)(B) search warrant on his email account was properly denied. Based on the absence of a time limit in the warrant, it was not unreasonable to interpret the warrant to … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail, Overseizure, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA1: Alleged overseizure of email under SW would only require partial suppression; def doesn’t identify that which was overseized

CA11: Further detaining plaintiff at jail after she made bond on a hunch she was not legally in the U.S. denied QI

“The evidence, interpreted in the light most favorable to Alcocer, is sufficient for a reasonable jury to conclude that Mills violated Alcocer’s Fourth Amendment rights by continuing to detain her without new probable cause after her attempted posting of bond … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Immigration arrests, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Further detaining plaintiff at jail after she made bond on a hunch she was not legally in the U.S. denied QI

MI: Def’s lying about smell of MJ was PC despite state’s medical MJ law

Defendant’s lying about the smell of marijuana in his car was probable cause that he was in possession of more than the amount permitted under the state medical marijuana law. People v. Moorman, 2020 Mich. App. LEXIS 1111 (Feb. 13, … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on MI: Def’s lying about smell of MJ was PC despite state’s medical MJ law

CA9: Motion to suppress tax records obtained by IRS because his “private property interests” were invaded wasn’t presented below and is waived

“Galloway next argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress because the IRS’s warrantless inspection of his financial records violated his private-property interests under the Fourth Amendment. But Galloway ‘never requested suppression on this ground in … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Motion to suppress tax records obtained by IRS because his “private property interests” were invaded wasn’t presented below and is waived