Category Archives: Inventory

CA4: Inventory would happen so that’s inevitable discovery

The discovery of the contraband was by inevitable discovery because an inventory was going to occur in any event. The fact the policy wasn’t written isn’t determinative as long as it is reasonable. United States v. Bullette, 2017 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Inventory | Comments Off on CA4: Inventory would happen so that’s inevitable discovery

E.D.Mich.: If an inventory is otherwise valid, it doesn’t matter that it also had an investigative purpose

Defendant’s cell phone was seized from his car after a stop. If an inventory is otherwise valid, it doesn’t matter that it also had an investigative purpose. A search warrant was sought for the cell phone. The affidavit for the … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: If an inventory is otherwise valid, it doesn’t matter that it also had an investigative purpose

D.Nev.: Failure to follow inventory showed it was a general rummaging

Defendant’s stop was based on the Wyoming LPN coming back as expired, but it turned out that Wyoming has a different database for trucks, even pickup trucks. Shortly thereafter, the LPN was found in a different search by dispatch. The … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Failure to follow inventory showed it was a general rummaging

AL: Lack of an inventory sheet fatal to the state’s claim the search was valid as an inventory

The lack of an inventory sheet fatal to the state’s claim the search was valid as an inventory. Keith v. State, 2017 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 14 (March 17, 2017):

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on AL: Lack of an inventory sheet fatal to the state’s claim the search was valid as an inventory

MA: Impoundment unreasonable in purported “high crime” area that was partly residential with other cars already there; Swiss Army knife not an indicator other weapons in car

Defendant was stopped and arrested in a “high crime” area [which apparently didn’t include stripping cars]. The area was partly residential and other cars were parked on the street, too. That alone didn’t make it reasonable to have to impound … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inventory | Comments Off on MA: Impoundment unreasonable in purported “high crime” area that was partly residential with other cars already there; Swiss Army knife not an indicator other weapons in car

IN: Inventory not sufficiently regulated to be valid; also, officer’s deviation from inventory showed pretext

The search of defendant’s truck was not sufficiently regulated by standardized police procedures and therefore was pretextual, as the vague, conflicting inventory regime of the police department was not capable of sufficiently regulating the search. Even if it was, the … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on IN: Inventory not sufficiently regulated to be valid; also, officer’s deviation from inventory showed pretext

D.Neb.: Govt proved inventory valid and not pretext; there was also PC for the search

Defendants were arrested for robbery, and they objected to the R&R as failing to consider that the inventory of the vehicle was a pretext for an investigative search. The court finds that the policy on inventory was followed and that … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Inventory | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Govt proved inventory valid and not pretext; there was also PC for the search

D.Nev.: No actual or apparent authority to consent shown; presence of gun in motel room not exigency per se

Actual authority to consent and apparent authority in a motel room are two different things. Here, the government can’t show either on this record. The possibility of a gun in the room is not an exigent circumstance. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Emergency / exigency, Inventory | Comments Off on D.Nev.: No actual or apparent authority to consent shown; presence of gun in motel room not exigency per se

WA: While impoundment was permissible, state law required reasonable alternatives be considered first

While impoundment was statutorily permitted, state law requires alternatives be explored before impoundment. Here it wasn’t, so the impoundment is suppressed. State v. Froehlich, 2017 Wash. App. LEXIS 366 (Feb. 14, 2017):

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on WA: While impoundment was permissible, state law required reasonable alternatives be considered first

IA: Two finding defective inventory due to police investigative motive

“In any event, it is clear that Officer Carter failed to remove the license plates and registration receipt before impounding the car. Because the officer overlooked the legislatively imposed requirements for the impoundment, it appears he was motivated solely by … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on IA: Two finding defective inventory due to police investigative motive

E.D.Mich.: Mixed motive for otherwise valid inventory doesn’t make it unreasonable

A mixed motive for an inventory search doesn’t make it unreasonable as long as the inventory was reasonable. United States v. Dowl, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7184 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 19, 2017):

Posted in Inventory, Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Mixed motive for otherwise valid inventory doesn’t make it unreasonable

E.D.Okla.: Search of vehicle on roadside not unreasonable because it started as a proper inventory

Defendant was stopped for his tag light being out, and it resulted in finding that his DL was suspended. That meant that his vehicle would be towed. The inventory by all appearances was starting, because a video showed the inventory … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Okla.: Search of vehicle on roadside not unreasonable because it started as a proper inventory

W.D.Mo.: RS still required for a Long protective weapons search of a car

There was no reasonable suspicion for a protective weapons search. Without reasonable suspicion, all cars are subject to search without cause, thereby nullifying the Fourth Amendment. Defendant was stopped in his driveway, and there was also an effort to call … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Protective sweep | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: RS still required for a Long protective weapons search of a car

W.D.Pa.: After gun was found in car, search incident and automobile exception didn’t apply, but inventory was inevitable [right result, wrong reasoning]

After defendant’s car was stopped, the officers conducted a Michigan v. Long protective weapons search of the car while gaining control of the defendant, and a gun was located. There was a search incident: “Furthermore, he was standing at the … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Inventory, Protective sweep, Search incident | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: After gun was found in car, search incident and automobile exception didn’t apply, but inventory was inevitable [right result, wrong reasoning]

TX2: “the impoundment of the vehicle was a task tied to the traffic infraction” and didn’t extend it

Defendant was stopped for a brake light infraction, and neither he nor the passenger had a valid DL or insurance. Thus, impoundment is in order. “Similarly, the impoundment of the vehicle was a task tied to the traffic infraction, and … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on TX2: “the impoundment of the vehicle was a task tied to the traffic infraction” and didn’t extend it

IN: Search incident of jacket left in car on arrest for outstanding warrant was unreasonable

Defendant was pulled over because an LPN check showed his license was suspended and there was a warrant out for him. When he got out of the car, he took off his jacket and left it in the car. Since … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on IN: Search incident of jacket left in car on arrest for outstanding warrant was unreasonable

CA11: Prior drug sale from house was nexus for SW of house

Nexus was shown for the search of defendant’s house by the prior drug transactions that occurred inside the house. This was a seven year long conspiracy. United States v. Woodard, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 21382 (11th Cir. Nov. 30, 2016). … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Nexus | Comments Off on CA11: Prior drug sale from house was nexus for SW of house

D.Minn.: The officer doesn’t need to cite the specific inventory policy section at the suppression hearing to make the inventory lawful

Defendant’s stop for speeding was justified. “Officer Petterson testified that he decided to impound the Acura because the Acura was not registered to Reilly; the owner was not present; both occupants of the vehicle were being taken into custody; the … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on D.Minn.: The officer doesn’t need to cite the specific inventory policy section at the suppression hearing to make the inventory lawful

NY: Shoplifting custodial arrest justified impoundment and towing of def’s car

Defendant drove to a store and was custodially arrested there for shoplifting. Towing and inventory of his vehicle off their parking lot was reasonable. A valid inventory followed. People v. Tardi, 2016 NY Slip Op 07822, 2016 N.Y. LEXIS 3535 … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY: Shoplifting custodial arrest justified impoundment and towing of def’s car

S.D.Ohio: More than a conclusory statement of recklessness or intent required for Franks hearing

Just because information is erroneous doesn’t get you a Franks hearing. More than a mere conclusion is required that the statement was recklessly or deliberately false. United States v. Kurtz, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160356 (S.D.Ohio Nov. 18, 2016). Defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inventory | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: More than a conclusory statement of recklessness or intent required for Franks hearing