Category Archives: Inventory

Cal.1: Inventory of duffle bag at booking was reasonable

Defendant refused to leave a 24 hour restaurant after being asked several times, and the police were called. Finally, defendant was arrested and taken into custody. His duffle bag was inventoried at the police station and a .38 revolver and … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on Cal.1: Inventory of duffle bag at booking was reasonable

WI: Community caretaking function can support impoundment and inventory despite lack of standardized procedures

Defendant matched the description of a man wanted for robbery and a probation violation. He was found on the property of a storage unit company. After his arrest, his vehicle was parked between two rows of buildings, blocking one unit … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Inventory | Comments Off on WI: Community caretaking function can support impoundment and inventory despite lack of standardized procedures

IA: Unnecessary to seek out somebody else not at scene to retrieve car when driver and only passenger arrested

The state showed the impoundment policy was standardized and complied with. It wasn’t necessary at the time to seek out somebody else to retrieve the car from the roadside when both the driver and passenger were arrested. State v. Tronca, … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on IA: Unnecessary to seek out somebody else not at scene to retrieve car when driver and only passenger arrested

OH8: Checking under the hood during an inventory search is reasonable

Checking under the hood during an inventory search is reasonable. State v. Lewis, 2017-Ohio-4300, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 2352 (8th Dist. June 15, 2017). The totality and detail of information from the CI provided the police reasonable suspicion to stop … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH8: Checking under the hood during an inventory search is reasonable

CT: Slight difference between description and actual dress didn’t undermine RS

Defendant’s request to stop by the police based on his description and clothing was still justified despite the slight disagreement between what he was wearing and the description. Reasonable suspicion developed and defendant’s pat down was justified. State v. Lewis, … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CT: Slight difference between description and actual dress didn’t undermine RS

KS: State’s failure to prove the inventory policy was fatal to the inventory search

State’s failure to prove the inventory policy was fatal to the inventory search. State v. Baker, 2017 Kan. LEXIS 310 (June 9, 2017):

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on KS: State’s failure to prove the inventory policy was fatal to the inventory search

ND: Consent to search to prevent towing and impoundment of a vehicle is voluntary

Consent to search to prevent towing and impoundment of a vehicle is voluntary. State v. Shick, 2017 ND 134, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 131 (June 7, 2017). Officers got a call about a possible drunk driver, and they went to the … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Inventory | Comments Off on ND: Consent to search to prevent towing and impoundment of a vehicle is voluntary

OH1: Where inventory ordinance required police consider alternatives to impoundment, failure to do so leads to suppression

Cincinnati Municipal Code requires alternatives to impoundment be considered, and a failure to do so can void the inventory, as here. “Ultimately, nothing presented at the suppression hearing indicates that before ordering the inventory search, Officer Clarkson even considered the … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Inventory | Comments Off on OH1: Where inventory ordinance required police consider alternatives to impoundment, failure to do so leads to suppression

W.D.Mo.: Driveway not curtilage for dog sniff of car

Relying on United States v. Beene, 818 F.3d 157 (5th Cir. 2016) (posted here), defendant’s car parked on the driveway in front of his home was subject to a dog sniff as if it was on the street. Because of … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Curtilage, Dog sniff, Inventory | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Driveway not curtilage for dog sniff of car

N.D.Ala.: Police had discretion to return car to rental company after inventory search

Police had the discretion under the inventory policy to conduct the inventory and then allow the car to go back to Enterprise car rental rather than the police impound lot. Also, a disturbed panel in the car permitted the inventory … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: Police had discretion to return car to rental company after inventory search

CA4: Inventory would happen so that’s inevitable discovery

The discovery of the contraband was by inevitable discovery because an inventory was going to occur in any event. The fact the policy wasn’t written isn’t determinative as long as it is reasonable. United States v. Bullette, 2017 U.S. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Inventory | Comments Off on CA4: Inventory would happen so that’s inevitable discovery

E.D.Mich.: If an inventory is otherwise valid, it doesn’t matter that it also had an investigative purpose

Defendant’s cell phone was seized from his car after a stop. If an inventory is otherwise valid, it doesn’t matter that it also had an investigative purpose. A search warrant was sought for the cell phone. The affidavit for the … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: If an inventory is otherwise valid, it doesn’t matter that it also had an investigative purpose

D.Nev.: Failure to follow inventory showed it was a general rummaging

Defendant’s stop was based on the Wyoming LPN coming back as expired, but it turned out that Wyoming has a different database for trucks, even pickup trucks. Shortly thereafter, the LPN was found in a different search by dispatch. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Failure to follow inventory showed it was a general rummaging

AL: Lack of an inventory sheet fatal to the state’s claim the search was valid as an inventory

The lack of an inventory sheet fatal to the state’s claim the search was valid as an inventory. Keith v. State, 2017 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 14 (March 17, 2017):

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on AL: Lack of an inventory sheet fatal to the state’s claim the search was valid as an inventory

MA: Impoundment unreasonable in purported “high crime” area that was partly residential with other cars already there; Swiss Army knife not an indicator other weapons in car

Defendant was stopped and arrested in a “high crime” area [which apparently didn’t include stripping cars]. The area was partly residential and other cars were parked on the street, too. That alone didn’t make it reasonable to have to impound … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inventory | Comments Off on MA: Impoundment unreasonable in purported “high crime” area that was partly residential with other cars already there; Swiss Army knife not an indicator other weapons in car

IN: Inventory not sufficiently regulated to be valid; also, officer’s deviation from inventory showed pretext

The search of defendant’s truck was not sufficiently regulated by standardized police procedures and therefore was pretextual, as the vague, conflicting inventory regime of the police department was not capable of sufficiently regulating the search. Even if it was, the … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on IN: Inventory not sufficiently regulated to be valid; also, officer’s deviation from inventory showed pretext

D.Neb.: Govt proved inventory valid and not pretext; there was also PC for the search

Defendants were arrested for robbery, and they objected to the R&R as failing to consider that the inventory of the vehicle was a pretext for an investigative search. The court finds that the policy on inventory was followed and that … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Inventory | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Govt proved inventory valid and not pretext; there was also PC for the search

D.Nev.: No actual or apparent authority to consent shown; presence of gun in motel room not exigency per se

Actual authority to consent and apparent authority in a motel room are two different things. Here, the government can’t show either on this record. The possibility of a gun in the room is not an exigent circumstance. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Emergency / exigency, Inventory | Comments Off on D.Nev.: No actual or apparent authority to consent shown; presence of gun in motel room not exigency per se

WA: While impoundment was permissible, state law required reasonable alternatives be considered first

While impoundment was statutorily permitted, state law requires alternatives be explored before impoundment. Here it wasn’t, so the impoundment is suppressed. State v. Froehlich, 2017 Wash. App. LEXIS 366 (Feb. 14, 2017):

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on WA: While impoundment was permissible, state law required reasonable alternatives be considered first

IA: Two finding defective inventory due to police investigative motive

“In any event, it is clear that Officer Carter failed to remove the license plates and registration receipt before impounding the car. Because the officer overlooked the legislatively imposed requirements for the impoundment, it appears he was motivated solely by … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on IA: Two finding defective inventory due to police investigative motive