Category Archives: Warrant requirement

W.D.Tenn.: Order to execute on civil default judgment satisfied the warrant clause

The sheriff’s office entered defendant’s home to execute on a civil judgment for attorneys fees in a domestic matter obtained by a default judgment. Firearms were found, but he was a prohibited person. The civil process was a court order … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Order to execute on civil default judgment satisfied the warrant clause

AR: While SW must be issued on affidavit or recorded testimony, questions about no-knock didn’t have to be recorded, especially when no-knock refused

Search warrants must be issued on affidavits or recorded testimony. The issuing judge asked questions about the no-knock entry, and this was separate from probable cause finding. This did not have to be recorded. Besides, the judge denied the no-knock … Continue reading

Posted in Knock and announce, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on AR: While SW must be issued on affidavit or recorded testimony, questions about no-knock didn’t have to be recorded, especially when no-knock refused

C.D.Cal.: Purging an invalid consent search from the affidavit for SW, the remainder shows no PC, so search suppressed

The testimony of the defendants on consent was consistent, detailed, and credible, but the testimony of the officers was vague. Thus, the consent is found invalid. Since the consent search made it into the affidavit for the search warrant, it … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Purging an invalid consent search from the affidavit for SW, the remainder shows no PC, so search suppressed

CT: City housing admin SW was properly issued; no state constitutional right to adversary proceeding first

City inspectors suspected defendant’s premises to have an illegal third apartment because there were three mailboxes and entrances and other suspicions. He refused an inspection by city officials, so they applied for an administrative search warrant that showed probable cause … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, State constitution, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CT: City housing admin SW was properly issued; no state constitutional right to adversary proceeding first

SCOTUS: Birchfield v. N.D.: refusing a blood test cannot result in charges

A breath test may be performed incident to an arrest without a warrant. A blood test requires a warrant or exigency. “Motorists may not be criminally punished for refusing to submit to a blood test based on legally implied consent … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, SCOTUS, Search incident, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Birchfield v. N.D.: refusing a blood test cannot result in charges

AZ: Serial SWs were justified by further developments in a serial murder investigation

Defendant was ultimately charged with 74 felonies, including nine murders. His house was subjected to three different search warrants, each specific to one or two crimes. It was reasonable for the police to get another warrant to go back after … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Probable cause, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on AZ: Serial SWs were justified by further developments in a serial murder investigation

N.D.Ga.: Citing wrong U.S.C. section doesn’t undermine PC if any crime is shown

Citation to the wrong U.S. Code section in a search warrant affidavit doesn’t undermine the probable cause if one can discern that some federal crime has occurred. The affidavit here described mass sale of cell phone apps in violation of … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Citing wrong U.S.C. section doesn’t undermine PC if any crime is shown

TN: There is no constitutional requirement that the homeowner be identified in a SW

The IP address for the house defendant was staying in was linked to child pornography, and the search warrant for the premises clearly described the single family dwelling. Thus, all the personal property of those associated with the property, except … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Staleness, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on TN: There is no constitutional requirement that the homeowner be identified in a SW

S.D.Tex.: “the qualified common-law right of access to affidavits supporting search warrants when a pre-indictment investigation is underway” applies to defendant, too

Under Baltimore Sun, “the public has a qualified common-law right of access to affidavits supporting search warrants when a pre-indictment investigation is underway.” That includes the defendant. He also gets return of any privileged documents and to copies of others, … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: “the qualified common-law right of access to affidavits supporting search warrants when a pre-indictment investigation is underway” applies to defendant, too

PA: Totality and common sense overcomes typo on year in SW application

On the totality and by common sense, the record and the affidavit for the search warrant show that a critical date in the search warrant application had a typographical error as to the year (March 2013 v. March 2014), and … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Good faith exception, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on PA: Totality and common sense overcomes typo on year in SW application

N.D.Okla.: “Playpen” website SW invalid as outside USMJ’s jurisdiction and no GFE, but a case contra, too

In the fifth Tor “Dark Net” case involving the child pornography “Playpen” website where the government took over the website and moved it to Virginia, this court, applying Tenth Circuit precedent, finds the USMJ lacked jurisdiction to issue a search … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: “Playpen” website SW invalid as outside USMJ’s jurisdiction and no GFE, but a case contra, too

CA6: Clerk issued arrest warrant without judicial authority; not unreasonable unless no PC

That court clerks issue arrest warrants, but not acting as a neutral and detached magistrate, is not a constitutional violation unless the arrest was without probable cause. Plaintiffs, given four amendments to the complaint, never show that the arrest was … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA6: Clerk issued arrest warrant without judicial authority; not unreasonable unless no PC

CA10: Wrong address in SW didn’t invalidate it where the right place was well described and correctly found

The wrong address did not invalidate the warrant where the right place was well described and correctly found. Goss v. Bd. of County Comm’rs, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 7735 (10th Cir. April 26, 2016):

Posted in Warrant execution, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA10: Wrong address in SW didn’t invalidate it where the right place was well described and correctly found

D.Mass.: NIT warrant in CP investigation that transmitted information to user’s computers violated USMJ statute and Rule 41 and no GFE

In a child porn investigation, the government took over a server with child porn known as “Website A.” “The government used a “Network Investigative Technique (“NIT”) [warrant] that would allow the government covertly to transmit computer code to Website A … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Surveillance technology, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.Mass.: NIT warrant in CP investigation that transmitted information to user’s computers violated USMJ statute and Rule 41 and no GFE

D.Neb.: Cut and paste error where address went into “things to be seized” wasn’t fatal where things were apparent from warrant application as a whole

An apparent cut and paste error led to the officer pasting the place to be searched into the things to be seized section of the warrant looking for clothing from a robbery. The affidavit included pages of photographs of the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Scope of search, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Cut and paste error where address went into “things to be seized” wasn’t fatal where things were apparent from warrant application as a whole

CA6: Separate warrant not required to isolate def in his own house in bathroom to talk to him

Police executed a search warrant and took defendant to the bathroom so they could talk to him about becoming a CI. The detention in the apartment and then the bathroom was justified by the probable cause for this search warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA6: Separate warrant not required to isolate def in his own house in bathroom to talk to him

TN: Failure to leave the SW not a “clerical error” subject to cure or GFE

In 2011, Tennessee adopted the Exclusionary Rule Reform Act with a statutory good faith exception that included “clerical errors.” Failing to leave a copy of the warrant at the place searched or with the householder is not a “clerical error.” … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on TN: Failure to leave the SW not a “clerical error” subject to cure or GFE

IL: Once officers leave the premises after executing a SW, they need another to come back

Police searched defendant’s house with a warrant, unhandcuffed defendant, and left. Then they returned to search again. A second warrant was required. Just because they could have obtained a second warrant doesn’t mean that was inevitable discovery. [And what’s the … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on IL: Once officers leave the premises after executing a SW, they need another to come back

N.D.Ga.: Failure to swear affiant doesn’t void SW; GFE applies despite magistrate’s mere alleged cursory review

The issuing magistrate’s failure to swear the affiant officer is a judicial failure, not a law enforcement failure, and it doesn’t void the warrant, and there was probable cause. Also, the magistrate’s apparently cursory review of the affidavit still made … Continue reading

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Failure to swear affiant doesn’t void SW; GFE applies despite magistrate’s mere alleged cursory review

TX3: Where there was a magistrate at municipal building 24 hours a day, 2½ mi. away, failure to get warrant voids blood draw

There was a magistrate on duty 24 hours a day at the municipal court building, which was about 2½ miles from the scene of the accident, but the officer made no effort to obtain a search warrant. The statute required … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on TX3: Where there was a magistrate at municipal building 24 hours a day, 2½ mi. away, failure to get warrant voids blood draw