Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

LA4: Def’s entering and leaving a drug house wasn’t RS on its own

“Turning to the facts of this case, we also find the officer’s observation of defendant entering and exiting a residence that was reasonably suspected as being used for narcotics transactions to be insufficient to support a reasonable suspicion of participation … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA4: Def’s entering and leaving a drug house wasn’t RS on its own

CA6: There was already RS to detain the occupants of the car when def fled from it

“In total, we find that there was reasonable suspicion to block the white Saturn into the driveway. Taking together the smell of marijuana in an area known for drug violations, the person leaning into the car, and the car’s backing … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on CA6: There was already RS to detain the occupants of the car when def fled from it

OH5: RS ended when the driver turned out not to be the wanted owner, and further detention was without RS

When reasonable suspicion evaporated with the fact that the driver of the vehicle was not the owner for whom there was a warrant out, the stop should have ended. State v. Brentlinger, 2019-Ohio-4989, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 5073 (5th Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH5: RS ended when the driver turned out not to be the wanted owner, and further detention was without RS

D.Mont.: Criminal history and gang affiliation alone isn’t RS

Defendants were riding in the back of a pickup truck after getting a ride from an acquaintance. The officer stopped the truck and extended the stop about 90 minutes without any reasonable suspicion at all. Their criminal histories and alleged … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Criminal history and gang affiliation alone isn’t RS

WA: Arrestee’s right to advice of right to counsel doesn’t require stopping execution of SW to tell him

While an arrestee is entitled to a prompt notice of his right to counsel, police do not have to interrupt execution of a search warrant to do it. State v. Ackerman, 2019 Wash. App. LEXIS 3023 (Dec. 2, 2019). Officers … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on WA: Arrestee’s right to advice of right to counsel doesn’t require stopping execution of SW to tell him

E.D.Pa.: Def could be transported to precinct for lineup on RS alone

Defendant was handcuffed as a part of his stop for officer safety and to secure the scene. They could also put him in a police car handcuffed. Finally, transporting him to the precinct for a lineup wasn’t an unreasonable seizure … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Def could be transported to precinct for lineup on RS alone

CA5: Heien objective reasonableness applies to a stop for driving too slow even though it was just def’s car in traffic

Driving too slow for too long justifies a stop, at least Heien makes it reasonable: “Given the dearth of authority on whether a single vehicle constitutes traffic …, the ambiguity in the statute, and the danger observed by the officer, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA5: Heien objective reasonableness applies to a stop for driving too slow even though it was just def’s car in traffic

N.D.Tex.: Not material to not mention def’s state of mind hours before the occurrence

Defendant claimed a Franks violation from the officer’s failure to include things that were true about defendant before things went south that night. It wasn’t material to defendant’s state of mind at the time of the occurrence. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Not material to not mention def’s state of mind hours before the occurrence

CA8: Dist.Ct. erred in finding no RS for extending stop; there was, and it ripened to PC

The district court erred in finding there was no reasonable suspicion for extending the stop. “We have found a combination of nervous behavior and suspicious travel plans creates a reasonable suspicion justifying a traffic stop’s extension. … In the protective … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: Dist.Ct. erred in finding no RS for extending stop; there was, and it ripened to PC

E.D.N.C.: “[R]easonable suspicion need not rule out the possibility of innocent conduct.” Navarette

A brief meeting for what could only be described by the officer, in his experience, was likely a hand-to-hand sale in a high crime area reasonable suspicion for a stop. “Other suggested explanations by defendant, such as that defendant may … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: “[R]easonable suspicion need not rule out the possibility of innocent conduct.” Navarette

Reason: Volokh Conspiracy: What is “individualized” suspicion?

Reason: Volokh Conspiracy: What is “individualized” suspicion? by Orin S. Kerr:

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Reason: Volokh Conspiracy: What is “individualized” suspicion?

N.D.Miss.: Uncontradicted testimony that a DL checkpoint was validly set up makes checkpoint valid; plain view sustained

The state set up a driver’s license and safety checkpoint, and defendant was stopped there. He doesn’t contradict the officer’s testimony that it was set up by supervisory persons and was limited in time and scope. The stop was thus … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.Miss.: Uncontradicted testimony that a DL checkpoint was validly set up makes checkpoint valid; plain view sustained

D.Conn.: Arrest by bathroom door permits look into bathroom under protective sweep

Defendant was arrested in his apartment, right at the bathroom door, and looking in the bathroom was permitted by the protective sweep doctrine. In there, powder from drugs was visible in plain view. United States v. Ovalle, 2019 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Arrest by bathroom door permits look into bathroom under protective sweep

S.D.Ohio: Putting def in the back seat of a police car wasn’t unreasonable during a basic traffic stop

“Ward also argues that the traffic stop was extended by placing him in the back of the police cruiser. … However, the officer(s) needed to walk back to the police cruiser in order to complete the mission of issuing a … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Putting def in the back seat of a police car wasn’t unreasonable during a basic traffic stop

E.D.N.Y.: That some NYPD cops are known to lie doesn’t mean these two are because the bodycams and physical evidence make them credible

“The circumstances of the stop, search, and seizure of Defendant demonstrate that there was a strong reasonable suspicion to support a stop and search of Defendant, and then probable cause to arrest him. [¶] Defendant’s main argument is that the … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: That some NYPD cops are known to lie doesn’t mean these two are because the bodycams and physical evidence make them credible

E.D.N.C.: NC law requires RS for a supervision search, and here it’s lacking

North Carolina law requires reasonable suspicion for a supervision search, and here it was completely lacking. The motion to suppress is granted. United States v. Fuller, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202240 (E.D. N.C. Oct. 1, 2019).* State statute discusses concealed … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: NC law requires RS for a supervision search, and here it’s lacking

D.N.M.: Def’s car’s impoundment wasn’t justified by community caretaking function or need for inventory

The impoundment of defendant’s car wasn’t justified by either the community caretaking function or need for inventory. Whether the vehicle was even involved in a crime was inconclusive at best. United States v. Trujillo, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 201024 (D. … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Community caretaking function, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Def’s car’s impoundment wasn’t justified by community caretaking function or need for inventory

MO: Exigency was shown at the motion to suppress, and more was shown at trial

The trial court denied the motion to suppress because the entry was by exigent circumstances. The trial testimony confirms it. State v. Bolden, 2019 Mo. App. LEXIS 1823 (Nov. 19, 2019).* The traffic stop was justified under state law, and, … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MO: Exigency was shown at the motion to suppress, and more was shown at trial

N.D.Ind.: The encounter started as consensual because the officer approached from the side to a parked car; RS developed

The encounter with the officer was not a seizure. She was parked five spaces away from defendant’s car and off to the side. When talking to defendant she saw a meth pipe in plain view. “The parties do not dispute … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: The encounter started as consensual because the officer approached from the side to a parked car; RS developed

OR: During the “unavoidable lull” in a traffic stop, state constitution prohibits asking for consent without justification

During the “unavoidable lull” in a traffic stop, the state constitution prohibits asking for consent without further justification. State v. Arreola-Botello, 365 Ore. 695, 2019 Ore. LEXIS 794 (Nov. 15, 2019), aff’g 292 Ore. App. 214, 418 P.3d 785 (2018) … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: During the “unavoidable lull” in a traffic stop, state constitution prohibits asking for consent without justification