Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

OR: State could not raise new argument in CoA after remand never developed in trial court

On remand from the Supreme Court, the state asserted an argument never made in the trial court, and it’s treated as waived since there was no factual development. The prior decision is adhered to. State v. Heater, 271 Or. App. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of proof, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: State could not raise new argument in CoA after remand never developed in trial court

CA10: Unnecessarily overlong detention while handcuffed when it was apparent ptf not the man wanted was clearly established as a 4A violation

Plaintiff was detained too long after it was obvious that he was not the person they were looking for with the same last name during a familial dispute. That right was clearly established. There was no other independent justification. Martinez … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: Unnecessarily overlong detention while handcuffed when it was apparent ptf not the man wanted was clearly established as a 4A violation

NC: Taking defendant’s driver’s license back to the patrol car to run it is a seizure of the person and not de minimus under Rodriguez; RS required

Taking defendant’s driver’s license back to the patrol car to run it is a seizure of the person and not de minimus under Rodriguez. Reasonable suspicion is required. State v. Leak, 2015 N.C. App. LEXIS 445 (June 2, 2015) (2-1):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on NC: Taking defendant’s driver’s license back to the patrol car to run it is a seizure of the person and not de minimus under Rodriguez; RS required

NM declines to find plain view supported seizure of two pills in a baggie that fell out of the glove compartment while driver looking for papers

Seeing two pills in a small plastic baggie fall out of the glove compartment during a stop for expired tags when defendant was looking for his paperwork on the car was not subject to plain view. After all, pharmacy containers … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NM declines to find plain view supported seizure of two pills in a baggie that fell out of the glove compartment while driver looking for papers

TX2: Four states recognize the prohibitive collective knowledge but Texas does not

Four states recognize the prohibitive collective knowledge. Texas does not. Even though some officers may know that reasonable suspicion has dissipated, the officer making the stop did not. O’Bryan v. State, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 5406 (Tex. App. – Ft. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX2: Four states recognize the prohibitive collective knowledge but Texas does not

NE: Passenger standing out sunroof at 1:30 am justified community caretaking stop

The community caretaking function applies to passengers, and here the passenger was standing half out of the sunroof of a car at 1:30 am. That was justification for a stop. State v. Rohde, 22 Neb. App. 926, 2015 Neb. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Community caretaking function, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NE: Passenger standing out sunroof at 1:30 am justified community caretaking stop

MA: Flight and furtive movement to pants like holding a gun of a known felon RS

“Relying on DePeiza, we have held that collective factors, including the officer’s training and nine years’ experience in the district, the history of firearms in the neighborhood, the late hour, the defendant’s head movements, his continuous placement of his hand … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MA: Flight and furtive movement to pants like holding a gun of a known felon RS

D.Neb.: Defendant was clearly not free to leave and his 30 minute questioning was unreasonable and not even de minimus as in Rodriguez

The stop here was overlong under Rodriguez, but, of course, happened before. Here, however, the defendant was told he was free to leave, but the court finds that “There is no doubt that the defendant did not feel he was … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Defendant was clearly not free to leave and his 30 minute questioning was unreasonable and not even de minimus as in Rodriguez

ID: For stop of a person in proximity to searched premises, courts have to evaluate the layout, size of premises, and where it happened

Applying Summers and Bailey, defendant approached a four unit apartment building as police were executing a search warrant, and he was properly detained. The size of the apartment building and his proximity made it reasonable. It turned out that defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ID: For stop of a person in proximity to searched premises, courts have to evaluate the layout, size of premises, and where it happened

D.Minn.: Def showed his consent by stepping aside and waving officers in

Defendant was asked for consent to enter his apartment, and he stepped to the side and waved his arm gesturing to come in. He manifested consent by his actions. United States v. Duran, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65777 (D. Minn. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Def showed his consent by stepping aside and waving officers in

CA2: Virtually intentional frisk of wrong man was manifestly unreasonable

Defendant was stopped on the street in NYC because the officer thought that he was somebody else. Actually, it was fairly obvious that they didn’t look alike. Moreover, defendant produced a valid ID in his real name, and it was … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: Virtually intentional frisk of wrong man was manifestly unreasonable

NJ: Protective sweep of car that nobody was getting back into was unreasonable

Defendant was in a car with three others stopped for traffic violations. None of the four owned the car, but the driver produced the registration and insurance card and admitted his license was suspended. All four were frisked and nothing … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NJ: Protective sweep of car that nobody was getting back into was unreasonable

MS: Unknown and uncorroborated CI was woefully insufficient

CI was unknown to the officer and he had no information on the CI’s basis of knowledge nor did he corroborate anything. The motion to suppress should have been granted. Chesney v. State, 2015 Miss. App. LEXIS 277 (May 19, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MS: Unknown and uncorroborated CI was woefully insufficient

AR: State implied consent law doesn’t bar SW for blood, following weight of authority

State law on implied consent states that a refusal means “no [other] test will be given” but that does not preclude a search warrant for blood, following the weight of authority. Metzner v. State, 2015 Ark. 222, 2015 Ark. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AR: State implied consent law doesn’t bar SW for blood, following weight of authority

IN: If product of illegal entry after knock-and-talk is removed from SW affidavit, PC still remained

Enduring surveillance of a duplex led to a knock-and-talk, and the officer was met with the overpowering smell of marijuana when the door was opened. Marijuana in plain view was seen on a table because the officer entered. Even redacting … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN: If product of illegal entry after knock-and-talk is removed from SW affidavit, PC still remained

OH8: Def’s frisk before being put in back of police car for no apparent reason was unreasonable

After the driver of a car was arrested, the passenger was transportation-less because the car was being towed. He was going to call for a ride. For no apparent reason, the officer put him in the patrol car and patted … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OH8: Def’s frisk before being put in back of police car for no apparent reason was unreasonable

W.D.Okla.: Def consented to further questioning when also told he was free to go

“The evidence shows that Trooper Rohr issued the warning, returned Defendant’s papers to him, told him to have a safe trip and turned away from Defendant’s pickup truck to return to his patrol car. He then turned back and asked … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: Def consented to further questioning when also told he was free to go

NJ: Reasonable for officer to follow arrested person back to room for ID; reasonable suspicion he was armed

The officer had reasonable suspicion to believe that defendant had been smoking marijuana, and he asked for ID. Defendant said it was in his room, so the officer said he’d have to follow defendant to get it. The officer noticed … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NJ: Reasonable for officer to follow arrested person back to room for ID; reasonable suspicion he was armed

D.P.R.: Drug dealers usually keep drugs and money at home, so that’s nexus

Drug dealers usually keep the drugs and money at home. So, when probable cause is shown, defendant can be expected to have drugs and money at home. United States v. Gomez-Encarnacion, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64131 (D.P.R. May 15, 2015). … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Drug dealers usually keep drugs and money at home, so that’s nexus

D.Utah: Defendant doctor who sold 95% of practice had no standing in the records of the clinic

The search warrant here was for medical records of a clinic and in storage. The defendant doctor who filed the motion to suppress sold the clinic and kept a 5% share. Records were in storage, too. The court concludes that … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on D.Utah: Defendant doctor who sold 95% of practice had no standing in the records of the clinic