Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

IA: Dispute as to facts doesn’t matter where def’s version supports RS

Even believing the defendant’s version of the facts, there was reasonable suspicion. Therefore, the credibility question doesn’t have to be decided. State v. Gallardo, 2015 Iowa App. LEXIS 803 (September 10, 2015). The only issue on the search here is … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: Dispute as to facts doesn’t matter where def’s version supports RS

D.Kan.: “What is a high crime area?” is nebulous

On the totality, the officers had reasonable suspicion. Breaking them down, however, some were afforded less weight, such as “what is a high crime area?” Here, the reasonable suspicion ripened into probable cause and permitted a search incident. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Kan.: “What is a high crime area?” is nebulous

C.D.Cal.: A mismatched license plate to the vehicle is more indicative of crime than other traffic offenses

A mismatched license plate to the vehicle is more indicative of crime than other traffic offenses. It is a reasonable suspicion warranting a patdown. “Such a risk was only heightened here because the ‘traffic violation’ at issue—using forged or stolen … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: A mismatched license plate to the vehicle is more indicative of crime than other traffic offenses

D.Nev.: When a Mexican national was stopped, the time for a call to EPIC could be included in the reasonable length of stop

A call to the El Paso Intelligence Center about defendant who produced a Mexican passport was reasonably included in the length of the stop. Defendant was noticeably nervous, gave conflicting travel plans, and the license plate did not match the … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Nev.: When a Mexican national was stopped, the time for a call to EPIC could be included in the reasonable length of stop

TX1: Mere acquiescence can still be consent[!]

While the Texas standard of consent is clear and convincing evidence, “even a finding of ‘“[m]ere acquiescence” may constitute a finding of consent.’ Meekins, 340 S.W.3d at 463-64.” [apparently even though SCOTUS says no]. Hutchins v. State, 2015 Tex. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Pretext, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX1: Mere acquiescence can still be consent[!]

MD: DUI arrest is generally justification for a search incident for the cause of intoxication

A DUI arrest is generally justification for a search incident of the interior of the vehicle for whatever made defendant intoxicated under Gant. “Although we may not be able reconcile these divergent holdings, it is clear that (1) an officer’s … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on MD: DUI arrest is generally justification for a search incident for the cause of intoxication

W.D.Pa.: No standing in an overdue rental car in somebody else’s name

Defendant had no standing in a rental car that was overdue and rented by somebody else who let him drive it. A representative of the rental car company came to the scene to retrieve it, and he consented to a … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: No standing in an overdue rental car in somebody else’s name

TX6: Failure to cite state constitution and rules in argument on motion to suppress was waiver

While defendant’s motion to suppress cited the Fourth Amendment, the state constitution, and state criminal rules, at the hearing defendant mentioned only the Fourth Amendment, so the others were waived. Glenn v. State, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 9433 (Tex. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX6: Failure to cite state constitution and rules in argument on motion to suppress was waiver

OH2: The driver matched the description of the owner of the vehicle, so ordering him out was reasonable when a warrant came back for owner

Defendant’s LPN showed that the owner was the same person who had committed criminal trespass. The driver matched the general description of the owner, so that justified getting the driver out. State v. Goines, 2015-Ohio-3505, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 3427 … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH2: The driver matched the description of the owner of the vehicle, so ordering him out was reasonable when a warrant came back for owner

S.D.Ala.: Asking def about his money unlawfully extended stop

After the traffic stop, defendant should have been released. As he tried to go, questions about his money unreasonably extended the stop. United States v. Snowden, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112966 (S.D.Ala. August 26, 2015):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Ala.: Asking def about his money unlawfully extended stop

ID: Implied consent applied to unconscious DUI suspect

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not objecting to a blood draw while defendant was unconscious from a car wreck. “Here, Sims impliedly consented to be tested for alcohol by driving a motor vehicle in Idaho. At no point did … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ID: Implied consent applied to unconscious DUI suspect

OR: “right result, wrong reason” rule not applied where it denies defense chance to litigate it

After reversal by the state supreme court and on remand, the state argued an alternative basis (“right result, wrong reason”) for affirming, but the court of appeals held that the alternative basis had not been raised before and couldn’t be … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: “right result, wrong reason” rule not applied where it denies defense chance to litigate it

CA6: “In this respect, we must be mindful of the particular exigencies presented to the officers, who must make decisions to safeguard their own and the public’s safety under the fog of rapidly developing situations and without the luxury of complete information.”

Individually, none of the factors of reasonable suspicion was enough, but collectively they were. “In this respect, we must be mindful of the particular exigencies presented to the officers, who must make decisions to safeguard their own and the public’s … Continue reading

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: “In this respect, we must be mindful of the particular exigencies presented to the officers, who must make decisions to safeguard their own and the public’s safety under the fog of rapidly developing situations and without the luxury of complete information.”

N.D.Cal.: Arguing for trespass rather than the reasonable expectation of privacy standard doesn’t enhance the likelihood of showing standing

Arguing for trespass rather than the reasonable expectation of privacy standard doesn’t enhance the likelihood of showing standing. “Proceeding under the trespass theory, rather than the reasonable expectation of privacy theory, defendants have not demonstrated that they have a possessory … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Reasonable suspicion, Trespass | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Arguing for trespass rather than the reasonable expectation of privacy standard doesn’t enhance the likelihood of showing standing

D.Colo.: Motion for return of property denied until post-conviction process over

Defendants moved for return of their property after conviction and the appeal was affirmed. The government gets to keep it pending conclusion of any collateral review which might be filed. United States v. Banks, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107994 (D.Colo. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Standing | Comments Off on D.Colo.: Motion for return of property denied until post-conviction process over

IA: Def counsel not charged with anticipating changes in law; no IAC for not arguing an issue adopted two years after appeal

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not arguing an issue that was not decided for the defense under the state constitution until two years after his appeal was decided. Counsel is not charged with anticipating changes in the law under … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: Def counsel not charged with anticipating changes in law; no IAC for not arguing an issue adopted two years after appeal

N.D.Fla.: Showing up at a prearranged drop point, a motel room, was RS

Showing up at a prearranged drop point, a motel room, was reasonable suspicion that the defendant was there with the drugs. United States v. Mendoza, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109526 (N.D.Fla. August 18, 2015).* A worker’s gesture was not consent … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Fla.: Showing up at a prearranged drop point, a motel room, was RS

MA: A license plate reader is not treated as an anonymous informant with little or no credibility

A license plate reader is not treated as an anonymous informant with little or no credibility. It is based on a database that is sufficiently reliable to based a stop on. Commonwealth v. Ramos, 2015 Mass. App. LEXIS 116 (August … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MA: A license plate reader is not treated as an anonymous informant with little or no credibility

D.Kan.: LPN being unassigned was justification for a stop and then the use of a drug dog wasn’t unreasonable

Defendant’s stop was based on the LPN coming back “not assigned,” and then the officer smelled alcohol on him. The use of the drug dog during all this did not extend the stop and was not unreasonable. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Kan.: LPN being unassigned was justification for a stop and then the use of a drug dog wasn’t unreasonable

N.D.Ga.: To get a hearing on a motion to suppress, defendant has to allege facts sufficient to provide relief

To get a hearing on a motion to suppress, defendant has to allege facts sufficient to provide relief, if they can be proved. United States v. Ochoa, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105925 (N.D.Ga. July 8, 2015). Officers had reasonable suspicion … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: To get a hearing on a motion to suppress, defendant has to allege facts sufficient to provide relief