Category Archives: Apparent authority

E.D.Tenn.: Using def’s cell phone to call 911 to obtain its number did not violate Riley

The use of defendant’s cell phone to call 911 to obtain its number did not violate Riley, and, even so, was within the good faith exception. United States v. Caldwell, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4279 (E.D. Tenn. January 14, 2015), … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Cell phones, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Using def’s cell phone to call 911 to obtain its number did not violate Riley

CA6: Def deferred consent to his mother, and her’s was voluntary

Defendant deferred the question to consent to search his place to his mother with whom he lived. She validly and promptly consented to the officers’ request, and it was all voluntary. United States v. Gossett, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 417, … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Def deferred consent to his mother, and her’s was voluntary

PA: Occupant of house lacked authority to consent to search intended guest’s luggage

Defendant left luggage and a shaving kit at his girlfriend’s apartment because he was coming back there to spend the night. They get stopped and defendant gets arrested. Defendant is a suspect in a robbery. The police get consent from … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Nexus | Comments Off on PA: Occupant of house lacked authority to consent to search intended guest’s luggage

S.D.W.Va.: Def’s girlfriend consented to search of house for guns when order of protection issued

Defendant’s live-in girlfriend went to the courthouse and obtained an emergency protection order (EPO) which, under West Virginia law, required the respondent to rid himself of firearms. Here, she specifically alleged that she’d been threatened with a gun. Police came … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Def’s girlfriend consented to search of house for guns when order of protection issued

CA11: “[D]o what you gotta do” was consent here

“[D]o what you gotta do” was consent here, not mere acquiescence to authority. “The officers’ testimony at the suppression hearing also reflects that May gave permission to enter. In similar circumstances where only a few officers were present without their … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA11: “[D]o what you gotta do” was consent here

OR: Common authority over space does not mean common authority over all items in that space

Common authority over space does not mean common authority over all items in that space. Just because people could go into defendant’s bedroom does not mean that they had common authority over everything in the room. There was no common … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority | Comments Off on OR: Common authority over space does not mean common authority over all items in that space

CA7: Defense witness on apparent authority completely unbelievable

This district court did not credit defendant’s witness on the question of consent. As for credibility, “The court relied on the officers’ corroborative testimony, Hearnes’s ‘willingness to lie to law enforcement and under oath,’ and Hearnes’s demeanor throughout her testimony, … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Burden of proof, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Defense witness on apparent authority completely unbelievable

OH12: Living with a probationer is not a complete waiver of a reasonable expectation of privacy, except as to common areas

By living with a probationer, one’s reasonable expectation of privacy is not completely lost and the entire house is not open to a probation search. The probationer can only consent to search of common areas. Here, the probationer let the … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OH12: Living with a probationer is not a complete waiver of a reasonable expectation of privacy, except as to common areas

MD: Drug deal in defendant’s vestibule was in open view and opening glass door was by exigency

Remembering that there is a difference between plain view and open view, the officers saw defendant selling cocaine in the vestibule between a glass door and the front door of his house. When the police approached, they could see the … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Standing | Comments Off on MD: Drug deal in defendant’s vestibule was in open view and opening glass door was by exigency

E.D.Mo.: By calling police to a home invasion robbery, defendant consented to entries

Defendant called the police because he was the victim of a home invasion robbery. That investigation also turned into an investigation of defendant for drug possession. Officers returned the next day to talk about the home invasion, but they also … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: By calling police to a home invasion robbery, defendant consented to entries

CA4: Officers didn’t force their way in, but the exceptions to knock-and-announce applied

The officer hit defendant’s door hard to announce his presence under the knock-and-announce requirement and the door swung open on its own. That was technically a “breaking” under § 3109, but it was reasonable to enter without announcement because of … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception, Consent, Knock and announce, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA4: Officers didn’t force their way in, but the exceptions to knock-and-announce applied

TN: Named eyewitness to shooting was not a “CI” needing corroboration

The “CI” in this homicide case was a known eyewitness who knew the defendant. He was a citizen informant, not a mere snitch, and his version had a presumption of reliability. State v. Dotson, 2014 Tenn. LEXIS 694 (September 30, … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Informant hearsay, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on TN: Named eyewitness to shooting was not a “CI” needing corroboration

FL2: Common authority to consent did not extend to guest’s backpack

The owner of the place searched had the authority to consent to a search of the bedroom where defendant was sleeping. Defendant was just a short term guest and was asleep when the police came in. The common authority applied … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Inventory, Probable cause | Comments Off on FL2: Common authority to consent did not extend to guest’s backpack

Cal.2: Pre-Riley cell phone search incident expressly authorized by case law so Davis GFE applies

The pre-Riley search of defendant’s cell phone was expressly permitted by California case law at the time of the search, so the good faith exception applies. People v. Macabeo, 2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 793 (2d Dist. September 3, 2014). Based … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Cell phones, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on Cal.2: Pre-Riley cell phone search incident expressly authorized by case law so Davis GFE applies

CA5: Consent to search trunk doesn’t include passengers bags, too; no apparent authority

While the government didn’t argue standing in the USDC, it was decided, so it can appeal on that question. Passengers in a vehicle have standing to challenge the search of their own luggage. Here, the driver’s consent to search the … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent | Comments Off on CA5: Consent to search trunk doesn’t include passengers bags, too; no apparent authority

E.D.Wis.: Officers are not required to doubt what they see in determining apparent authority to consent

The consenter called 911 to say that her live-in boyfriend locked her out of the house and battered her. When they arrived, she was back in, and her children were there, along with her and clothes and kids’ toys. Based … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Officers are not required to doubt what they see in determining apparent authority to consent

W.D.Ky.: Casual visitor had no apparent authority to consent, and he wasn’t even asked what his connection was

Merely answering the door isn’t enough to be asked for consent. This guy was a casual visitor, he had no actual authority to consent, and the police made no effort to determine his apparent authority. If they asked, it would … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Casual visitor had no apparent authority to consent, and he wasn’t even asked what his connection was

S.D.N.Y.: A woman forced to leave a home because of alleged domestic violence, even though expressing no intent to return, still has apparent authority to consent

A woman forced to leave a home because of alleged domestic violence, even though expressing no intent to return, still has apparent authority to consent. United States v. Turner, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75088 (S.D. N.Y. June 2, 2014): This … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: A woman forced to leave a home because of alleged domestic violence, even though expressing no intent to return, still has apparent authority to consent

IL: Def’s locking self in bathroom overcame husband’s consent to enter under Randolph

Two police officers came to defendant’s home to arrest her for DUI, and her husband arguably consented to an entry to arrest her. Her locking herself in the bathroom, however, was a rejection of consent and binding. The officer’s threatening … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent | Comments Off on IL: Def’s locking self in bathroom overcame husband’s consent to enter under Randolph

CA4: Having no keys and breaking in through window belies apparent authority to consent

Officers came to plaintiff’s house with his former girlfriend who they contend consented to the entry. She, however, had no key to the house and they broke in through a window. Plaintiff stated a § 1983 claim because it wasn’t … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Apparent authority, Consent | Comments Off on CA4: Having no keys and breaking in through window belies apparent authority to consent