Category Archives: Ineffective assistance

W.D.Tex.: Lack of an arrest warrant does not mean they didn’t have probable cause

Officers had probable cause to arrest defendant for child pornography before the search warrant was executed on his place. The lack of an arrest warrant does not mean they didn’t have probable cause. United States v. Ruiz, 2014 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Lack of an arrest warrant does not mean they didn’t have probable cause

S.D.Ohio: There was PC for a Facebook account SW

There was probable cause for a Facebook account search warrant for defendant’s account, and it was limited in time so it was not overbroad. Also, the good faith exception would apply. United States v. Lowry, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93257 … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: There was PC for a Facebook account SW

CA9: Not questioning search likely sound strategy where defense at trial was disassociation from the drugs and the place they were found

Defendant’s IAC claim on his search isn’t proper for direct appeal, and it should proceed in a 2255. “However, counsel may have had strategic reasons not to file a suppression motion to avoid having Birrueta testify. For example, testifying at … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on CA9: Not questioning search likely sound strategy where defense at trial was disassociation from the drugs and the place they were found

D.Minn.: Violation of state law in admin subpoena for ISP information of no consequence in federal prosecution

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his third party information with his internet service provider, so the validity of the administrative subpoena isn’t an issue under circuit precedent. The fact that state law was used by state investigators … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Violation of state law in admin subpoena for ISP information of no consequence in federal prosecution

AK: Slightly changing search incident argument on appeal and including Gant was changing the issue

Defendant raised a search incident claim about his arrest: “(1) the toiletry bag was not “immediately associated” with his person, and because (2) the search of the bag was not sufficiently contemporaneous with his arrest.” On appeal, however, he raised … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AK: Slightly changing search incident argument on appeal and including Gant was changing the issue

E.D.Ky.: IAC overbroad search claim requires SW be attached or otherwise in the record

In a 2255 IAC, defendant’s claim that defense counsel was ineffective for not challenging the search warrant of his hotel room as overbroad fails without attaching the warrant so the court can see. It’s not otherwise in the record. United … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: IAC overbroad search claim requires SW be attached or otherwise in the record

M.D.Fla.: Def lacked standing in any event, so whether defense counsel was ineffective for not calling him as witness at suppression hearing is moot

2255 petitioner had no standing, even on his own allegations, so whether defense counsel was ineffective for not calling him to testify to standing was moot. “Because the Court finds that Campbell’s underlying claim to have had a reasonable expectation … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Def lacked standing in any event, so whether defense counsel was ineffective for not calling him as witness at suppression hearing is moot

CA9: Stone v. Powell bar and the full and fair litigation requirement survived adoption of the AEDPA

Stone v. Powell bar and the full and fair litigation requirement survived adoption of the habeas limitations of AEDPA. Newman v. Wengler, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 10094 (9th Cir. June 16, 2015). [This may be the only case to ever … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA9: Stone v. Powell bar and the full and fair litigation requirement survived adoption of the AEDPA

E.D.N.C.: Charged, but yet unproved, conduct can appear in a search warrant affidavit

There were four GPS warrants on the defendant’s car, owned by his wife, June-October 2014, renewed in state court every 30 days. The court can’t conclude they were started on stale information since it referred to an ongoing drug operation. … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Ineffective assistance, Staleness, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Charged, but yet unproved, conduct can appear in a search warrant affidavit

E.D.Pa.: Search of trash container on driveway where public was impliedly invited was not violation of curtilage

The court agrees that an entry into the curtilage to search a trash container would implicate Jardines, but it finds here that the entry onto the front part of the defendant’s property to the trash container was still the area … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, GPS / Tracking Data, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Search of trash container on driveway where public was impliedly invited was not violation of curtilage

D.Minn.: Def showed his consent by stepping aside and waving officers in

Defendant was asked for consent to enter his apartment, and he stepped to the side and waved his arm gesturing to come in. He manifested consent by his actions. United States v. Duran, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65777 (D. Minn. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Def showed his consent by stepping aside and waving officers in

CA9: Denial of a suppression hearing is reviewed for abuse of discretion; no contested facts, no abuse

Denial of a suppression hearing is reviewed for abuse of discretion. Here, there were no contested facts, and the district court found that the use of a flashlight to illuminate defendant’s car seeing a gun in plain view was reasonable. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA9: Denial of a suppression hearing is reviewed for abuse of discretion; no contested facts, no abuse

D.Ariz.: In rejecting a search argument, defense counsel isn’t obligated to explain all the legal theories to the client to then discount them

In explaining a guilty plea, it isn’t necessary for counsel to explain to the client all the legal theories for and against a search (among other issues) before discarding them. Counsel was not ineffective. Chrzaszcz v. United States, 2014 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: In rejecting a search argument, defense counsel isn’t obligated to explain all the legal theories to the client to then discount them

D.S.C.: Nexus shown simply by drug dealer going home after the sale

The affidavit here was short, but not “bare bones.” Also, nexus is shown because defendant left the drug deal and went home. United States v. Hooks, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183573 (D.S.C. April 21, 2014). 2255 petitioner did not show … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance, Nexus | Comments Off on D.S.C.: Nexus shown simply by drug dealer going home after the sale

IL: IAC where defendant would have won nonappealed search issue

Defense counsel was ineffective in not appealing a valid motion to suppress that had been denied by the trial court but, on the merits, would have been reversed. Going to the merits of the search and seizure claim, defendant would … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IL: IAC where defendant would have won nonappealed search issue

DE: Name of owner of property in SW doesn’t need to be identified to be valid

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not challenging that defendant wasn’t named in the search warrant for his specifically described property. [Remember, search warrants are usually for specifically ID’d places, and naming the owner is almost never necessary. If the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on DE: Name of owner of property in SW doesn’t need to be identified to be valid

NC: Open container in plain view permitted a search incident for more evidence

Defendant’s stop led to plain view of an open container. That justified a search incident for more because, after all, the console could hold beer cans, even if the officer could have merely issued a citation. State v. Fizovic, 2015 … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Ineffective assistance, Search incident | Comments Off on NC: Open container in plain view permitted a search incident for more evidence

S.D.Ga.: Defendant not entitled to new counsel where appointed counsel wouldn’t file a frivolous motion to suppress

Defendant’s motion for appointment of new counsel because defense counsel refused to file a motion to suppress is denied. The motion was patently frivolous. Defendant was detained by Home Depot employees for shoplifting, and they removed a gun from him. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Private search | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Defendant not entitled to new counsel where appointed counsel wouldn’t file a frivolous motion to suppress

D.Mass.: When defendant was arrested on a SW for premises for just him, a search incident of his bag while handcuffed would be unreasonable; but, he consented

Officers had a search warrant for premises (based on a warrant pinging his cell phone) to arrest defendant. The search incident of his bag at the time could not be justified by the search incident doctrine because he was handcuffed … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Search incident | Comments Off on D.Mass.: When defendant was arrested on a SW for premises for just him, a search incident of his bag while handcuffed would be unreasonable; but, he consented

TX1: Comment on refusal to consent here wasn’t prejudicial

The prosecutor commented on defendant’s refusal to consent and defense counsel didn’t object. On this record, there was plenty of evidence of defendant’s knowledge of the drugs such that the error, if it was, was prejudicial to him. Jones v. … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Consent, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on TX1: Comment on refusal to consent here wasn’t prejudicial