Category Archives: Ineffective assistance

CA4: Two address typos in affidavit for SW along with correct address twice and correct address in SW not error

There were two address typos in the affidavit, but it was in there correct twice, too. The warrant was correct. The search was reasonable. “In these circumstances, the technical errors in the search warrant affidavit did not invalidate the warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA4: Two address typos in affidavit for SW along with correct address twice and correct address in SW not error

CA6: Dodging the question when asked about a weapon during an investigative detention added to RS

Defendant allegedly had a motive to be violent, and, when officers asked him about whether he was armed, he dodged the question. The evidence supports the district court’s conclusion that there was reasonable suspicion for the intrusion. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Dodging the question when asked about a weapon during an investigative detention added to RS

CA6: There was already RS to detain the occupants of the car when def fled from it

“In total, we find that there was reasonable suspicion to block the white Saturn into the driveway. Taking together the smell of marijuana in an area known for drug violations, the person leaning into the car, and the car’s backing … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on CA6: There was already RS to detain the occupants of the car when def fled from it

E.D.N.C.: Defendant doesn’t get additional discovery in his quest to get a Franks hearing

Defendant doesn’t get additional discovery in his quest to get a Franks hearing. He has the burden of going forward and of proof. And, even if what he says is true, the probable cause isn’t sufficiently undermined. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Defendant doesn’t get additional discovery in his quest to get a Franks hearing

E.D.Pa.: Def could be transported to precinct for lineup on RS alone

Defendant was handcuffed as a part of his stop for officer safety and to secure the scene. They could also put him in a police car handcuffed. Finally, transporting him to the precinct for a lineup wasn’t an unreasonable seizure … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Def could be transported to precinct for lineup on RS alone

2255: Can’t keep reraising 4A claim you’ve already lost on

2255 petitioner already lost on his CSLI issue in the direct proceedings, and he doesn’t get to relitigate it now. Figueroa v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206123 (S.D. N.Y. Nov. 26, 2019).* Petitioner raised his Fourth Amendment issues … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on 2255: Can’t keep reraising 4A claim you’ve already lost on

CT: Def counsel’s choice to distance def from bedroom with drug was reasonable

Defendant argued defense counsel was ineffective for not pursuing a motion to suppress the search of a bedroom he stayed in in the house of another. The testimony was conflicting. Defendant said that he had exclusive use of the bedroom, … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CT: Def counsel’s choice to distance def from bedroom with drug was reasonable

W.D.N.C.: Guilty plea waived 4A IAC claim

“The knowing and voluntary guilty plea waived all alleged ineffective assistance of counsel which preceded it, including counsel’s alleged deficiencies with regards to Fourth Amendment issues.” Allen v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 205762 (W.D. N.C. Nov. 26, 2019). … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Guilty plea waived 4A IAC claim

TN: Def can’t show prejudice for IAC claim for failing to call a witness he can’t identify or summarize testimony of

Defendant filed a post-conviction petition alleging that a necessary witness hadn’t been called for the suppression hearing. He could not, however, provide any decent information about name, where she could be found, what she would say, or that it would … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on TN: Def can’t show prejudice for IAC claim for failing to call a witness he can’t identify or summarize testimony of

D.Guam: 4A standing is not jurisdictional, so the court can go to GFE without deciding PC

Standing to contest a search and seizure issue is not jurisdictional, so the court doesn’t have to decide standing. Going to the merits, there was probable cause for the search warrant for the package arriving by mail, and the delay … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Guam: 4A standing is not jurisdictional, so the court can go to GFE without deciding PC

D.S.D.: Def’s claim at arrest that he was confused about the age of the person he was meeting was a trial question, not a PC question

There was probable cause for defendant’s arrest for attempted sex trafficking a minor. He said during his post-arrest interview that he was confused by the internet ad that he was responding to, but that doesn’t undermine probable cause. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Def’s claim at arrest that he was confused about the age of the person he was meeting was a trial question, not a PC question

D.D.C.: When serving SW in sex assault investigation where def was known to be a felon, a Glock speed loader in plain view permitted search for a gun

D.C. Metro police had a search warrant for evidence of a sexual assault. When they entered, they saw a Glock magazine speed loader. That caused them to search for a firearm because they knew defendant was a felon learning, that … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Standards of review | Comments Off on D.D.C.: When serving SW in sex assault investigation where def was known to be a felon, a Glock speed loader in plain view permitted search for a gun

D.N.M.: No 4A requirement police call for someone to retrieve car to avoid inventory

The inventory of defendant’s car was reasonable and followed policy. “The problem with Defendant’s argument is that he advanced no legal authority that the Fourth Amendment requires police to execute an arrest warrant on a suspect in a way that … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inventory | Comments Off on D.N.M.: No 4A requirement police call for someone to retrieve car to avoid inventory

Four 2255s

2255 claim that officer perjured himself during suppression hearing was already raised there and on appeal and barred here. United States v. Brown, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 201044 (D. Nev. Nov. 19, 2019).* Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not pursuing … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on Four 2255s

N.D.Iowa: A “Brinks box” in the house being searched with a warrant for drugs was subject to the search

A “Brinks box” in the house being searched with a warrant for drugs was subject to the search. United States v. Simmermaker, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 199422 (N.D. Iowa Oct. 25, 2019), adopted, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 198379 (N.D. Iowa … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Scope of search | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: A “Brinks box” in the house being searched with a warrant for drugs was subject to the search

PA: Birchfield not retroactive on post-conviction

Birchfield is not a new rule for post-conviction purposes and thus not retroactive. Commonwealth v. Olson, 2019 Pa. LEXIS 6120 (Oct. 31, 2019). Defendant was involved in an ATV accident and hospitalized. The state wanted BAC, but he wasn’t available. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on PA: Birchfield not retroactive on post-conviction

OH8: Realtime CSLI was used only to locate def; nothing to suppress

Defendant was called by the police for an interview about a child molestation accusation, and he agreed to meet. He didn’t show. Then the police were concerned maybe he was fleeing and they sought realtime CSLI to locate him. “We … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on OH8: Realtime CSLI was used only to locate def; nothing to suppress

IL: Def’s leaving house to deliver to a controlled buy was nexus for house

There was nexus for the search warrant for defendant’s house where he was alleged to have left his house and driven directly to the scene of a controlled buy where he was delivering. People v. Teague, 2019 IL App (3d) … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Nexus, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Def’s leaving house to deliver to a controlled buy was nexus for house

NY2: Where SW was issued to a small town PD, using officers from other agencies to assist in raid doesn’t violate 4A

The small town police department that obtained the search warrant did not have its own entry team for safety. Using officers from other county and state agencies to assist didn’t violate the warrant. People v. Ward, 2019 NY Slip Op … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NY2: Where SW was issued to a small town PD, using officers from other agencies to assist in raid doesn’t violate 4A

E.D.Ky.: Paraphrasing def’s jail calls on hearsay without affiant actually listening to them isn’t a Franks violation

A full forensic search of defendant’s cell phone was authorized by the affidavit which was attached to the search warrant. There were admissions from the defendant on jail calls to others that were reported to the police. The paraphrasing the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Strip search | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Paraphrasing def’s jail calls on hearsay without affiant actually listening to them isn’t a Franks violation