Category Archives: Good faith exception

N.D.Cal.: 2012 download of cell phone two hours after arrest not search incident; Davis inapplicable

Two defendants, two cell phones searched in March 2012. One on parole, one not. The parole search of the cell phone is valid. The other, however, wasn’t a search incident of the cell phone; it was downloaded two hours after … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Cell phones, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: 2012 download of cell phone two hours after arrest not search incident; Davis inapplicable

Stop The Drug War: Will Supreme Court Cell Phone Search Ruling Apply Retroactively?

Stop The Drug War: Will Supreme Court Cell Phone Search Ruling Apply Retroactively? by Clarence Walker. Since so many federal cases held that the search incident doctrine applied until Wurie, Davis good faith pretty much seals the fate of that … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception | Comments Off on Stop The Drug War: Will Supreme Court Cell Phone Search Ruling Apply Retroactively?

D.Neb.: Cell phone GPS location was obtained by court order under § 2703 so GFE applies

Cell phone GPS location data was obtained by HSI with a court order on probable cause. While it wasn’t under Rule 41, it was clearly covered by good faith under § 2703. United States v. Garcia, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Cell phone GPS location was obtained by court order under § 2703 so GFE applies

D.Neb.: Good faith exception applies to applications for CSLI

The good faith exception applies to applications for CSLI. United States v. Corona, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106398 (D. Neb. June 23, 2014): Notwithstanding the sufficiency of the search warrant issued by Judge Gossett, or any theoretical ramifications behind distinguishing … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Good faith exception applies to applications for CSLI

ID: Search of second two cell phones just prior to warrant issuing was inevitable discovery

Defendant had three cell phones and the police had a search warrant for one based on its location because defendant’s rape victim said she believed there was a video of her on the phone. When the others were discovered, other … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Independent source | Comments Off on ID: Search of second two cell phones just prior to warrant issuing was inevitable discovery

N.D.Iowa: Strong ether odor big factor in PC for a meth lab

The Eighth Circuit has long held that the odor of ether is a strong factor in probable cause for a methamphetamine lab. Here, the affidavit for the search warrant recounted many other factors in his past drug history. At the … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Strong ether odor big factor in PC for a meth lab

CA8: Pre-Jardines dog search at the door saved by Davis good faith; Jardines had been already argued

A drug dog alerted at defendant’s door. After the motion to suppress was filed, but before it was heard, Jardines was decided. Because Eighth Circuit precedent allowed the use of a dog at the door prior to Jardines, the Davis … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA8: Pre-Jardines dog search at the door saved by Davis good faith; Jardines had been already argued

N.D.Tex.: Pre-Riley search incident of cell phone saved by Davis GFE

Pre-Riley search incident of cell phone was valid in the Fifth Circuit under the Davis good faith exception. The defendant’s trial concluded eight days before Riley was decided, and he raised the issue. United States v. Spears, 2014 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Pre-Riley search incident of cell phone saved by Davis GFE

WaPo: Riley won, but will Riley benefit from it?

WaPo: Riley won, but will Riley benefit from it? by Orin Kerr: The Supreme Court gave a big victory to criminal defendants last week when it held in Riley v. California that the police need a warrant to search a … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception | Comments Off on WaPo: Riley won, but will Riley benefit from it?

S.D.Fla.: GFE applies to overbreadth questions, too

A child pornography warrant was not overbroad as to the computers and a Dropbox account. Even it if was, the offending portion would be severed. Here, nothing was seized under the allegedly overbroad phrase. And, even if it was, the … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Good faith exception, Overbreadth | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: GFE applies to overbreadth questions, too

E.D.Tenn.: The day after Riley, Davis GFE saves a warrantless cell phone search despite no controlling case; this is just wrong

In February, the USMJ found the warrantless search of defendant’s cell phone unreasonable, but in Davis good faith [despite the lack of controlling law in support?]. The day after Riley, the USDJ finds that the search of a cell phone … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: The day after Riley, Davis GFE saves a warrantless cell phone search despite no controlling case; this is just wrong

Cato: Police Ignorance of the Law Is No Excuse (re: Heien v. North Carolina)

Cato: Police Ignorance of the Law Is No Excuse (re: Hein v. North Carolina) by Ilya Shapiro: To execute any search or seizure, a police officer must reasonably suspect that a crime has been or is being committed based on … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Cato: Police Ignorance of the Law Is No Excuse (re: Heien v. North Carolina)

OH5: Not necessary to have issuing magistrate at suppression hearing as witness; what does that add?

The trial court didn’t abuse its discretion in quashing the subpoena for testimomy from the issuing magistrate because it would add little or nothing to the suppression hearing. State v. McElfresh, 2014-Ohio-2605, 2014 Ohio App. LEXIS 2549 (5th Dist. June … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on OH5: Not necessary to have issuing magistrate at suppression hearing as witness; what does that add?

D.Kan.: Failure to sign affidavit for SW after being sworn not a Fourth Amendment violation

The failure of the officer to sign the affidavit after he was sworn did not void the warrant. It actually was issued on “oath or affirmation.” United States v. Williamson, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77703 (D. Kan. March 18, 2014), … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Failure to sign affidavit for SW after being sworn not a Fourth Amendment violation

D.S.D.: “Good faith is not a magic lamp for police officers to rub whenever they find themselves in trouble.”

Warrantless entry was not “sanitized” by an ex post facto search warrant. “‘Good faith is not a magic lamp for police officers to rub whenever they find themselves in trouble.’” Leon involved no police misconduct; this case does. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on D.S.D.: “Good faith is not a magic lamp for police officers to rub whenever they find themselves in trouble.”

KS: Failure to corroborate anonymous informants was a complete lack of PC for GFE

A police car was stolen and left in a ditch apparently with blood and hair left on it. Three anonymous calls linked defendant to the theft. He first agreed to come in and give samples and then didn’t show. A … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on KS: Failure to corroborate anonymous informants was a complete lack of PC for GFE

D.C.Cir. finds good faith exception applies to warrant, and probable cause was not even considered

The reliability of the informant’s tale does not need to be decided here because the good faith exception applies [without a word of why]. United States v. Matthews, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 10522 (D.C. Cir. June 6, 2014). Defendant in … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.C.Cir. finds good faith exception applies to warrant, and probable cause was not even considered

E.D.Tex.: Right address but wrong city in urban area was not constitutional defect since right house was searched

The address was given as Bridge City not Orange, Texas, but the officers misapprehended that the city limits was another block over. There was no chance here that the wrong house was searched, so this is not a constitutional error. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Right address but wrong city in urban area was not constitutional defect since right house was searched

TX11 declines to follow Davis good faith exception for Jones GPS violation

A GPS device installed on mere reasonable suspicion with a court order was invalid under Jones. Texas’s limited good faith exception does not recognize the Davis good faith exception. State v. Jackson, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 5861 (Tex. App.–-Eastland May … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on TX11 declines to follow Davis good faith exception for Jones GPS violation

OH8: Negligent dispatcher reported car as stolen that wasn’t; dispatcher’s negligence not attributable to searching officer

A negligent dispatcher reported the vehicle the juvenile was in as stolen, and it was stopped and searched. The information turned out to be wrong. Still, the search of the car was in the officer’s good faith reliance on the … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on OH8: Negligent dispatcher reported car as stolen that wasn’t; dispatcher’s negligence not attributable to searching officer