Category Archives: Good faith exception

TN finally adopts GFE after 30 years, at least as to Davis situations

Having avoided the question for 30 years until it was “squarely presented,” the Tennessee Supreme Court adopts the good faith exception to the extent provided for in Davis. It does not yet signal Leon good faith. State v. Reynolds, 2016 … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on TN finally adopts GFE after 30 years, at least as to Davis situations

IN: Failure to show CI’s basis of knowledge and reason to believe him was a failure of PC and GFE

Defendant was charged with illegally harvesting ginseng based on a search warrant that lacked a proper showing of informant hearsay with no showing of basis of knowledge or why it would be believable or should be credited. Turning to the … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on IN: Failure to show CI’s basis of knowledge and reason to believe him was a failure of PC and GFE

D.Neb.: Def could file second motion to suppress on different ground; this one prevails for lack of PC and no GFE

Defendant filed a motion to suppress on one ground and lost. He was not prohibited by law of the case from arguing the different issue of a complete lack of probable cause in a subsequent motion, on which he prevails. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Def could file second motion to suppress on different ground; this one prevails for lack of PC and no GFE

E.D.Va.: Fact of a sex crime against a child does not, without more, mean there is CP on def’s computer

Mere evidence of forcible sodomy on a child does not ipso facto mean that there is probable cause to believe that there will be child pornography on the defendant’s computer, too. Only one circuit would make that inferential link (CA8), … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Fact of a sex crime against a child does not, without more, mean there is CP on def’s computer

Two on good faith: No showing of PC for (1) GPS warrant and (2) nexus to def’s house

Game officers got a GPS warrant for defendant’s truck because they suspected him of hunting violations. After a couple of weeks, the truck’s movements were monitored daily. The issuance of the GPS warrant was without a finding of probable cause … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data, Nexus | Comments Off on Two on good faith: No showing of PC for (1) GPS warrant and (2) nexus to def’s house

DC: Inevitable discovery applied to cell phone search in 2002 rather than GFE

Inevitable discovery used to justify a search of a cell phone in 2002 because it might have been unreasonable under Riley from 2014 (no mention of good faith exception applied to pre-Riley searches). Logan v. United States, 2016 D.C. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on DC: Inevitable discovery applied to cell phone search in 2002 rather than GFE

D.Utah: Use of the drug dog while the ticket is being written is reasonable

Running a drug dog around a car before the ticket is finished being written is reasonable under Cabelles and Rodriguez. United States v. Smith, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124158 (D.Utah Sept. 12, 2016). Defendants raised a Fourth Amendment IAC claim. … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Utah: Use of the drug dog while the ticket is being written is reasonable

W.D.Tenn.: Nexus shown to def’s home by his committing the crime on a computer in his house and shipping packages there

FedEx determined that packages were being diverted, and they narrowed it to a former employee in Memphis and his computer was creating fictitious labels on a hijacked FedEx account. A Franks challenge fails because the probable cause isn’t undermined. Nexus … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Nexus shown to def’s home by his committing the crime on a computer in his house and shipping packages there

W.D.Tex.: In a Playpen case, planting software on a computer to cause it to transmit its address is “unquestionably a search”

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in IP addresses, but planting software on a computer to cause it to transmit its address is “unquestionably a search.” Recognizing the split of authority, Rule 41 was violated, but the court declines … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Exclusionary rule, F.R.Crim.P. 41, Good faith exception | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: In a Playpen case, planting software on a computer to cause it to transmit its address is “unquestionably a search”

M.D.Fla.: Reliance on a state court tracking order years ago was entitled to good faith

Under the Stored Communications Act, one must still prove standing as an “aggrieved person.” A state court cell phone tracking order is entitled to good faith exception deference, particularly since it was issued prior to any cases on the subject. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Reliance on a state court tracking order years ago was entitled to good faith

TX11: A search for evidence under an unconstitutional statute still suppressed in Texas despite good faith

Search for evidence under a statute later declared unconstitutional in state court had to be suppressed because Texas has only a limited good faith exception. Siller v. State, 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 8733 (Tex.App. – Eastland Aug. 11, 2016). Speculative … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception | Comments Off on TX11: A search for evidence under an unconstitutional statute still suppressed in Texas despite good faith

S.D.N.Y.: PC doesn’t have to be shown, just objective reliance on the showing for the issuance of the warrant

The affidavit for the search warrant was a close enough showing of probable cause to make reliance on the affidavit objectively reasonable under the good faith exception. United States v. Melendez, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98940 (S.D.N.Y. July 28, 2016):

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: PC doesn’t have to be shown, just objective reliance on the showing for the issuance of the warrant

CA5: Pre-Jardines dog sniff at garage was valid at time under case law; GFE applies

The good faith exception applied to validate dog sniffs based on law at the time saying that a sniff at defendant’s garage wasn’t an invasion of the curtilage back then. The search was 2008 and Jardines was 2013. The deterrent … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA5: Pre-Jardines dog sniff at garage was valid at time under case law; GFE applies

N.D.Ga.: Use of an electronic “sniffer” to find a target computer in a college building was particular

Police used an electronic “sniffer” to attempt to find a MAC address of an operating computer in an Emory University building. “The affidavit described the plan to use a sniffer to ‘identify the wireless device associated with the suspect MAC … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Good faith exception, Particularity | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Use of an electronic “sniffer” to find a target computer in a college building was particular

TN: The privilege of driving doesn’t operate as a consent to a blood draw

The privilege of driving doesn’t operate as a consent to a blood draw. The trial court here specifically found no consent, and the record does not preponderate against the finding. There is still no good faith exception in Tennessee. State … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception | Comments Off on TN: The privilege of driving doesn’t operate as a consent to a blood draw

Two on pre-Jones GPS and good faith

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging GPS in 2007. The state passed its own GPS statute in 2002, and defendant argued it wasn’t complied with when a GPS was placed on his car after an armored car robbery he … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on Two on pre-Jones GPS and good faith

PA: Totality and common sense overcomes typo on year in SW application

On the totality and by common sense, the record and the affidavit for the search warrant show that a critical date in the search warrant application had a typographical error as to the year (March 2013 v. March 2014), and … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Good faith exception, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on PA: Totality and common sense overcomes typo on year in SW application

M.D.La.: SW for examination of boat two years after alleged false BP spill claim for repairs not performed wasn’t stale

Defendant was suspected of making a fraudulent claim in the BP oil spill litigation claiming repairs on a boat. The government gathered information from others that strongly suggested that the boat was neither damaged nor repaired. The government finally applied … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Staleness | Comments Off on M.D.La.: SW for examination of boat two years after alleged false BP spill claim for repairs not performed wasn’t stale

CA2: Retention of mirror image of hard drives for 3 yrs before searching them under SW was at least good faith

The government copied defendant’s hard drives in 2003 but didn’t get around to searching them until 2006. After discussing the privacy interests in data and the wealth of information that could be held on a computer, the court said: “Having … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA2: Retention of mirror image of hard drives for 3 yrs before searching them under SW was at least good faith

N.D.Okla.: “Playpen” website SW invalid as outside USMJ’s jurisdiction and no GFE, but a case contra, too

In the fifth Tor “Dark Net” case involving the child pornography “Playpen” website where the government took over the website and moved it to Virginia, this court, applying Tenth Circuit precedent, finds the USMJ lacked jurisdiction to issue a search … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: “Playpen” website SW invalid as outside USMJ’s jurisdiction and no GFE, but a case contra, too