Category Archives: Good faith exception

E.D.Ky.: Ten months of Facebook seizure was way overbroad, but the govt gets the benefit of the GFE

Knowing that defendant and his confederates talked about drug transactions on Facebook messenger, the limited search warrant for that was based on probable cause, and a message was recovered referring to acquiring a “ball” and it was almost certainly an … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Social media warrants | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Ten months of Facebook seizure was way overbroad, but the govt gets the benefit of the GFE

E.D.Wis.: The affidavit lacked PC and didn’t connect def’s van to the crime, but the GFE applies anyway

The affidavit lacked probable cause and didn’t connect defendant’s van to the crime. Yet, it wasn’t so bad that the good faith exception couldn’t apply. [Seems like it should not have applied.] United States v. Burgess, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: The affidavit lacked PC and didn’t connect def’s van to the crime, but the GFE applies anyway

CA6: Ptf stated a 4A claim and overcame QI for the officer’s allegedly manufacturing case against him

Plaintiff produced enough evidence to show defendant officer falsified the case against him and overcame qualified immunity. The prosecutor dropped the criminal case when it was apparent it was bogus, and then plaintiff sued. Parnell v. City of Detroit, 2019 … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Police misconduct | Comments Off on CA6: Ptf stated a 4A claim and overcame QI for the officer’s allegedly manufacturing case against him

E.D.Mich.: Affidavit for SW was “bare bones” so no GFE; Brandeis quoted

The affidavit for the search warrant for defendant’s home proved to be “bare bones” and showed no probable cause or nexus to crime whatsoever. Accordingly, the good faith exception doesn’t even apply. The court cites Brandeis’s 1928 Olmstead dissent. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Affidavit for SW was “bare bones” so no GFE; Brandeis quoted

E.D.Va.: While the “four corners” rule is the standard for evaluating probable cause, the court may go outside the four corners in applying GFE

While the “four corners” rule is the standard for evaluating probable cause, the court may go outside the four corners in applying the good faith exception. Here, the officer had additional information he didn’t include because he’d reasonably thought he’d … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: While the “four corners” rule is the standard for evaluating probable cause, the court may go outside the four corners in applying GFE

W.D.Pa.: Retaining new counsel and attempting to reopen suppression hearing under guise of IAC claim rejected

Defendant retained new counsel and moved to reopen his suppression hearing alleging former counsel was ineffective for not raising a better argument. The motion is denied because this claim doesn’t satisfy the standard for reopening. The issue was available and … Continue reading →

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Retaining new counsel and attempting to reopen suppression hearing under guise of IAC claim rejected

CA9: Even if state tracking warrant was limited to state, GFE applies

Assuming without deciding that a state tracking warrant couldn’t be tracked outside the state, the exclusionary rule would not be applied because the officers were all clearly operating in good faith. Moreover, defendant’s committing yet another bank robbery while he … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on CA9: Even if state tracking warrant was limited to state, GFE applies

OH10: 1st time CI’s admission of own crimes aided his credibility

First time CI’s admission of own criminal involvement bolstered his credibility for use in probable cause. State v. Mendoza, 2019-Ohio-3382, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 3457 (10th Dist. Aug. 22, 2019). There was probable cause for issuance of the search warrant. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on OH10: 1st time CI’s admission of own crimes aided his credibility

CA6: District Court’s limited record prevents finding cell phone search was reasonable or inevitable discovery or GFE applied

Defendant was found passed out in a car. Defendant’s cell phone was seized as evidence, apparently of how he almost OD’d. An accidental glimpse at defendant’s phone revealed a thumbnail of potential child pornography. The district court applied the wrong … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA6: District Court’s limited record prevents finding cell phone search was reasonable or inevitable discovery or GFE applied

SD: Def wasn’t stopped by the officer when he encountered car based on anonymous call

Police received an anonymous call that a particular van was DUI. An officer found the van parked at a gas station, parked far enough away that defendant could back out, and he walked up and asked how defendant was doing, … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Seizure | Comments Off on SD: Def wasn’t stopped by the officer when he encountered car based on anonymous call

D.Mass.: GFE applies to scope of search under SW where place to be searched was two floors, not one

The issue here is whether the search warrant was overbroad because it turned out that the place to be searched was really two floors not one, but it wasn’t obvious from the outside. “The Court need not resolve this complex … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Good faith exception, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.Mass.: GFE applies to scope of search under SW where place to be searched was two floors, not one

CA9: Order suppressing laptop search for lack of PC and delay reversed; not wholely lacking in PC and delay was not unreasonable or culpable

The order suppressing a laptop search is reversed. The computer was seized under a state search warrant but searched under a federal warrant. Even if probable cause was lacking for the issuance of the search warrant, it was close enough … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Computer and cloud searches, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA9: Order suppressing laptop search for lack of PC and delay reversed; not wholely lacking in PC and delay was not unreasonable or culpable

CA2: Govt doesn’t get GFE in forfeiture search and seizure for overbreadth and particularity problem it created

In a forfeiture case initiated with a search warrant, defects in the warrant process denied the government resort to the good faith exception for failure to apprise all the officers what they were looking for and not attaching exhibits to … Continue reading →

Posted in Forfeiture, Good faith exception, Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on CA2: Govt doesn’t get GFE in forfeiture search and seizure for overbreadth and particularity problem it created

CA11: 4A IAC claim fails on merits of search issue

Petitioner’s IAC claim against defense counsel for not pursuing a Fourth Amendment claim was properly denied for lack of standing on the merits. Virgil v. Sec’y, Dept. of Corrections, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 23777 (11th Cir. Aug. 8, 2019).* Defendant’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA11: 4A IAC claim fails on merits of search issue

E.D.N.Y.: Violation of NYC bicycle ordinance and evasiveness justified arrest and search incident

Violation of the NYC bicycle use ordinance justifies arrest if necessary, and defendant was riding his bike on the sidewalk. “Here, the officers’ search of Defendant was incident to the lawful stop of Defendant for a bicycle traffic infraction, that … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Search incident | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Violation of NYC bicycle ordinance and evasiveness justified arrest and search incident

M.D.Pa.: On remand of Byrd, GFE applied to standing issue

On the Sixth Circuit’s remand of Byrd v. United States, 138 S.Ct. 1518 (2018), to the District Court, the court finds the good faith exception applies to standing issues arising before it was decided. United States v. Byrd, 2019 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: On remand of Byrd, GFE applied to standing issue

NY1: Parole officer’s search of def on arrest revealed gun; trial court erred in suppressing

Defendant’s parole officer had a warrant for defendant, and a patdown with the arrest resulted in plain feel of a gun. The trial court erred in suppressing the gun because it was validly found. People v. Jennings, 2019 NY Slip … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on NY1: Parole officer’s search of def on arrest revealed gun; trial court erred in suppressing

N.D.Iowa: It is proper for court to focus on pre-warrant police activities in deciding GFE question

Focusing on the officer’s pre-warrant activities, the court finds that their conduct in entering defendant’s hotel room was unreasonable and in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Thus, the good faith exception should not apply because it’s not reliance on the … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: It is proper for court to focus on pre-warrant police activities in deciding GFE question

C.D.Ill.: Prior judicial complaints of thin PC from officer go unheeded, but this SW survives GFE anyway

The district court once chided the officer here for a lackadaisical attitude toward showing probable cause with thin facts. The Seventh Circuit concurred but upheld it. And, the officer does it again. Commenting on the past, the court finds it … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: Prior judicial complaints of thin PC from officer go unheeded, but this SW survives GFE anyway

S.D.W.Va.: Computer SW for drugs led to healthcare fraud evidence; second SW needed; exclusionary rule should apply to deter

The government had a search warrant of ESI for drugs. When the search warrant was executed, they found evidence of healthcare billing fraud. A second search warrant was required, citing the government’s own search manual [noted and linked on the … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Overseizure | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Computer SW for drugs led to healthcare fraud evidence; second SW needed; exclusionary rule should apply to deter