Daily Archives: September 1, 2025

MD: Pretext inquiry under state constitution same as 4A

Appellant shows no basis for construing pretextual stops under the state constitution differently than the Fourth Amendment. Riley v. State, 2025 Md. App. LEXIS 727 (Aug. 27, 2025).* Defendant’s encounter with the officer here after one with mall security was … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Pretext, Probable cause, State constitution | Comments Off on MD: Pretext inquiry under state constitution same as 4A

TX13: Even if hemp and MJ smell similar, smell is still PC

The Dallas Court of Appeals “concluded that the odor of marijuana emanating from a vehicle gave an officer probable cause to search the vehicle and its occupants, even though the odor of marijuana is indistinguishable from the odor of hemp.” … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probable cause | Comments Off on TX13: Even if hemp and MJ smell similar, smell is still PC

ID: Drug dog’s nose touching a car door handle was not a search

Drug dog’s nose touching a car door handle was not a search. State v. Pendleton, 2025 Ida. App. LEXIS 38 (Aug. 29, 2025). The defendant officer violated no reasonable expectation of privacy by accessing plaintiff’s public Facebook posts. Dicks v. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Trespass | Comments Off on ID: Drug dog’s nose touching a car door handle was not a search

CA9: A successful Franks challenge means deletion of offending material and not addition of what was missing

“Welch successfully challenged five statements in the search warrant affidavit, and the district court did not clearly err in rejecting his challenge to several additional statements. Having found that Welch made the necessary showing with respect to the five statements, … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Staleness | Comments Off on CA9: A successful Franks challenge means deletion of offending material and not addition of what was missing

Six on habeas

Petitioner’s habeas claims include a Fourth Amendment claim barred by Stone. Steward v. Napoli, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169230 (S.D.N.Y. July 31, 2025).* Same: Bogan v. Christiansen, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 22218 (6th Cir. Aug. 27, 2025). The state court … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on Six on habeas