Monthly Archives: September 2020

CA6: CoA denied; consent conceded in guilty plea, and def now claims it was insufficient

“Hawkins conceded in his criminal proceeding that he consented to Fults’s search of his vehicle. To the extent that he now claims that his consent was insufficient because he did not own the vehicle, reasonable jurists would agree that his … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA6: CoA denied; consent conceded in guilty plea, and def now claims it was insufficient

PA: Def gets benefit of Birchfield by adequately raising issue before it was even decided; but he loses on merits

Defendant would get the benefit of Birchfield because he developed and preserved the same argument below. He loses on the merits, however, because he voluntarily consented before the officer told him of the criminal penalties for refusal, so his consent … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on PA: Def gets benefit of Birchfield by adequately raising issue before it was even decided; but he loses on merits

CA9: Hernandez bars Bivens claim against false arrest in Thailand U.S. allegedly participated in

“As in Hernandez, ‘it is glaringly obvious that [Hobbs’s] claims involve a new context.’ Id. at 744. And the same extraterritorial concerns that foreclosed a Bivens claim in Hernandez apply here with greater force. Unlike in Hernandez, all of the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA9: Hernandez bars Bivens claim against false arrest in Thailand U.S. allegedly participated in

MO: Alteration of SW application after warrant issued is strongly disapproved of, but here did not undermine PC

A mistake as to the name of the person’s BAC to be searched for and seized in the warrant could be overlooked where it correctly appeared 50 times in the affidavit. The officer’s altering the search warrant application with the … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on MO: Alteration of SW application after warrant issued is strongly disapproved of, but here did not undermine PC

W.D.Mo.: That later police reports would shed more light on affidavit for SW, that’s not a Franks issue

Affidavits for search warrants are presumed to be accurate under Franks, and that’s why the defense has to make a substantial preliminary showing of falsity. Alleging merely that other more timely reports would shed light on the subject is not … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Franks doctrine, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: That later police reports would shed more light on affidavit for SW, that’s not a Franks issue

IN: CI’s statement he bought from def ten times was a statement against penal interest

The CI was the target of a search, and he snitched off defendant as his source for about ten sales, the most recent the day before. That was a statement against penal interest. State v. Stone, 2020 Ind. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN: CI’s statement he bought from def ten times was a statement against penal interest

S.D.Ohio: Child abuse allegation isn’t stale because it’s of “continuing concern”

The information for the search warrant was not stale: “In this light, the information about child abuse was not stale. Indeed, the character of the alleged crime—abuse of a child—was grounds for continuing concern.” As to continuing a traffic stop: … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Staleness | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Child abuse allegation isn’t stale because it’s of “continuing concern”

CA8: TSA’s officers “satisfy the FTCA’s definition of an investigative or law enforcement officer” for FTCA

“The central question here is whether Transportation Security Administration (TSA) screening personnel, known as Transportation Security Officers (TSOs), satisfy the FTCA’s definition of an investigative or law enforcement officer. Holding that they do, we reverse and remand.” “Two of our … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Standing | Comments Off on CA8: TSA’s officers “satisfy the FTCA’s definition of an investigative or law enforcement officer” for FTCA