Daily Archives: October 29, 2016

IN: Failure to show CI’s basis of knowledge and reason to believe him was a failure of PC and GFE

Defendant was charged with illegally harvesting ginseng based on a search warrant that lacked a proper showing of informant hearsay with no showing of basis of knowledge or why it would be believable or should be credited. Turning to the … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on IN: Failure to show CI’s basis of knowledge and reason to believe him was a failure of PC and GFE

MA: Seizing backpack from impounded car was unreasonable where def’s grandmother was present and would have taken it

Defendant’s grandmother came to the scene of his stop where his car was being impounded. The contents of the car, here a backpack, could have just been given to the grandmother rather than seize and search it, too. Commonwealth v. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Inventory | Comments Off on MA: Seizing backpack from impounded car was unreasonable where def’s grandmother was present and would have taken it

FL2: Fireman reported to LEO that he saw drugs in house; police entry couldn’t rely on inevitable discovery where no effort to get warrant

A fire happened at defendant’s house, and the firefighters put it out. They saw some drugs and drug paraphernalia in the garage and told the police. On resweeping the house yet a second time for no apparent reason other than … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on FL2: Fireman reported to LEO that he saw drugs in house; police entry couldn’t rely on inevitable discovery where no effort to get warrant

D.Neb.: Def could file second motion to suppress on different ground; this one prevails for lack of PC and no GFE

Defendant filed a motion to suppress on one ground and lost. He was not prohibited by law of the case from arguing the different issue of a complete lack of probable cause in a subsequent motion, on which he prevails. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Def could file second motion to suppress on different ground; this one prevails for lack of PC and no GFE

Guam: Anonymous report of man in car with gun didn’t satisfy Navarette

Anonymous report of man with a gun in a car led to defendant’s stop, and the court finds it insufficient under Navarette because there was no allegation of a crime. People v. Mansapit, 2016 Guam 30, 2016 Guam LEXIS 28 … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on Guam: Anonymous report of man in car with gun didn’t satisfy Navarette

S.D.Ohio: Clause in SW that is overbroad requires def to show what was seized under it

One overbroad clause in the search warrant didn’t require exclusion of the rest that was specifically covered. Defendant also didn’t show that which was seized under the overbroad section to have it excluded. United States v. Traum, 2016 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Overbreadth | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Clause in SW that is overbroad requires def to show what was seized under it

VA: Filing wrong version of affidavit in the return fatal error under statute

The version of the affidavit filed with the clerk after the search was not the one issued by the judge, and this is a fatal error, considering the statute on the subject. The statute being violated, the Fourth Amendment doesn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on VA: Filing wrong version of affidavit in the return fatal error under statute

CO: State didn’t prove necessity for impoundment of car for driving on a suspended DL

The state failed to prove that defendant’s driving on a suspended license justified impoundment and inventory of the car. The state didn’t offer evidence to show that defendant would drive off from the ticket or that he would imperil other … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on CO: State didn’t prove necessity for impoundment of car for driving on a suspended DL

UT: State failed to prove inevitable discovery after warrantless entry into home investigating hit and run accident

Two police officers went to defendant’s home because the LPN on the car involved in a hit and run came back to that address. At the house, the housekeeper greeted them and said that defendant probably was driving the car. … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on UT: State failed to prove inevitable discovery after warrantless entry into home investigating hit and run accident

D.Guam: Traffic ticket delayed by 20 min, but RS existed on collective knowledge

The officer delayed writing the traffic ticket in this case for 20 minutes after the report back on defendant’s license, so Rodriguez was seemingly violated. So, the question is reasonable suspicion. The collective knowledge doctrine, however, of reasonable suspicion gives … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Guam: Traffic ticket delayed by 20 min, but RS existed on collective knowledge