Daily Archives: October 1, 2016

IA: Strip search incident shown justified in drug arrest

Strip search as a search incident to arrest was shown justified on this record. The smell of marijuana came from his person but nothing was on him. State v. Evans, 2016 Iowa App. LEXIS 1004 (Sept. 28, 2016):

Posted in Search incident, Strip search | Comments Off on IA: Strip search incident shown justified in drug arrest

MS: A case seizure after a consent search leads to no forfeiture; no evidence of wrongdoing

Claimant was stopped, and he consented to a search producing money. The order of forfeiture is reversed. The facts, when taken as a whole, did not show by more than just suspicion that the money discovered in a driver’s vehicle … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on MS: A case seizure after a consent search leads to no forfeiture; no evidence of wrongdoing

MA: SW for a cell phone requires facts for nexus to crime, not just “experience shows”

Nexus between a cell phone’s contents and a crime has to be shown by evidence, not just the officer’s experience in similar cases. Also, the phone was seized without a warrant to protect the contents from tampering, and it was … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on MA: SW for a cell phone requires facts for nexus to crime, not just “experience shows”

FL1: Passenger’s detention may be extended because of RS as to driver

A passenger is stopped with the vehicle he or she was in. The length of that stop depends upon what happens with the driver and passenger, and it can be extended lawfully as to the passenger because of reasonable suspicion … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL1: Passenger’s detention may be extended because of RS as to driver

M.D.Fla.: Even if def counsel filed and won suppression motion, would outcome of case be different?

On a search and seizure IAC claim, too, only the Strickland prejudice prong needs to be considered. Even if the evidence were suppressed, would the jury have still convicted? If yes, then no prejudice. Pittman v. United States, 2016 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Even if def counsel filed and won suppression motion, would outcome of case be different?

The Atlantic: Body Cameras Are Betraying Their Promise

The Atlantic: Body Cameras Are Betraying Their Promise by Robinson Meyer: They’re not transparent. They’re not independent. They’re not even turned on when they should be.

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on The Atlantic: Body Cameras Are Betraying Their Promise