Daily Archives: October 5, 2016

MA: Not being on the rental agreement as a permitted driver not an offense under state law for arrest

Defendant was driving a rental car rented by his mother that limited driving to her alone. Still, that didn’t make defendant guilty of anything under state law, and impounding and inventorying the car was unreasonable. Commonwealth v. Campbell, 2016 Mass. … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on MA: Not being on the rental agreement as a permitted driver not an offense under state law for arrest

FL1: Assault of officer on porch attempting to talk to def leading to police entry and more resisting not subject to exclusion

Police came to defendant’s trailer to talk to him about a domestic battery allegation. He refused to come out, and argued at the door with the police. Finally, he reached out and slapped an officer’s hand. That led to them … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Knock and talk | Comments Off on FL1: Assault of officer on porch attempting to talk to def leading to police entry and more resisting not subject to exclusion

CA11: “Inserting a probe into a woman’s vagina is plainly a search when performed by the government.”

Unwilling sonogram by a college in a class is a Fourth Amendment search. “Inserting a probe into a woman’s vagina is plainly a search when performed by the government.” Investigative purpose not required. Doe v. Valencia College Board of Trustees, … Continue reading

Posted in Search | Comments Off on CA11: “Inserting a probe into a woman’s vagina is plainly a search when performed by the government.”

WAMU (NPR): Police Said She Had An Open Container. Her Lawyer Asked For Body Camera Video

WAMU (NPR): Police Said She Had An Open Container. Her Lawyer Asked For Body Camera Video by Martin Austermuhle:

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on WAMU (NPR): Police Said She Had An Open Container. Her Lawyer Asked For Body Camera Video

Manuel v. City of Joliet argued today: Whether malicious prosecution claim may lie under 4A

Manuel v. City of Joliet argued today: Whether an individual’s Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable seizure continues beyond legal process so as to allow a malicious prosecution claim based upon the Fourth Amendment. (SCOTUSBlog) See Reason.com: Supreme … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Manuel v. City of Joliet argued today: Whether malicious prosecution claim may lie under 4A

OR: State carries burden of proving the reliability of the drug dog in the first instance (under state const.)

“Here, we easily conclude that the state did not create a sufficient record to support the use of Quincy’s alert as a basis for probable cause to search the car. At the suppression hearing, the state elicited testimony from Raiser … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Dog sniff, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: State carries burden of proving the reliability of the drug dog in the first instance (under state const.)

OH9: With smell of MJ, car doesn’t have to be searched before the dog does its work

The smell of marijuana coming from the car was sufficient to call for a drug dog to sniff the car. The officer wasn’t required to search the passenger compartment before the dog sniff. State v. Ross, 2016-Ohio-7082, 2016 Ohio App. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on OH9: With smell of MJ, car doesn’t have to be searched before the dog does its work