Daily Archives: October 14, 2016

CA5 follows CA6 & CA8: No REP on magnetic strip on back of gift cards

“The central issue in this case is whether a law enforcement officer’s scanning of the magnetic stripe on the back of a gift card is a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. We join two other circuits in … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA5 follows CA6 & CA8: No REP on magnetic strip on back of gift cards

OH11: No REP in CI’s recording def in own home

A CI recording the defendant in his own house doesn’t violate any reasonable expectation of privacy. State v. James, 2016-Ohio-7262, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 4121 (3d Dist. Oct. 11, 2016). 911 domestic call involving a knife and a Taser on … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH11: No REP in CI’s recording def in own home

OR: Mail recipient has a possessory interest in mail in transit; removing it from mail stream for dog sniff was unreasonable (under state constitution)

A US mail recipient has a constitutionally protected privacy interest in the package in transit under the Oregon Constitution, looking to Ex parte Jackson (1877). The package was effectively and unlawfully seized at the Portland airport mail facility for separate … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OR: Mail recipient has a possessory interest in mail in transit; removing it from mail stream for dog sniff was unreasonable (under state constitution)

OR: Stop of car outside trailer park known for drug activity unreasonable

Defendant pulled up and stopped outside a trailer park known for drug activity. Stopping him to ask for his ID was unreasonable. He’d committed no possible offense. State v. Bray, 281 Ore. App. 435 (Oct. 5, 2016). The stop of … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: Stop of car outside trailer park known for drug activity unreasonable

OH5: Ten day delay in getting warrant for cell phone seized on exigency was reasonable

The seizure of defendant’s cell phone at a police interview was reasonable. The detective had probable cause to believe that it contained evidence of an armed robbery. Its warrantless seizure was demanded by the exigencies of the situation because defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Reasonableness | Comments Off on OH5: Ten day delay in getting warrant for cell phone seized on exigency was reasonable

OH2: Warrantless blood draw from unconscious def being treated in hospital was reasonable because of exigency

Defendant ran into construction equipment killing his passenger and severely injuring himself. At the hospital, he was being treated and unconscious. He smelled of alcohol. The warrantless blood test was based on exigency. State v. Hayes, 2016-Ohio-7241, 2016 Ohio App. … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH2: Warrantless blood draw from unconscious def being treated in hospital was reasonable because of exigency