Daily Archives: December 25, 2015

WaPo: Wonkblog: New federal rules will subject truck drivers to more monitoring than ever

WaPo: Wonkblog: New federal rules will subject truck drivers to more monitoring than ever by Lydia DePillis: And they’re not very happy about it. [And under the third-party doctrine, the government can subpoena it all for use in a prosecution.]

Posted in Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on WaPo: Wonkblog: New federal rules will subject truck drivers to more monitoring than ever

WaPo: In fatal traffic stops, black motorists are killed more often

WaPo: In fatal traffic stops, black motorists are killed more often by Wesley Lowery: According to a Post database of police shootings, one in three people killed by police after a traffic stop was black — even though whites and … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on WaPo: In fatal traffic stops, black motorists are killed more often

D.Md.: Gov’t justified its NSL in this case in classified filings; nondisclosure provision here survives First Amendment scrutiny

The government justified its NSL in this case in classified filings, which will be supplemented with redacted versions. The court finds that the nondisclosure requirement survives First Amendment scrutiny, but the government is required by the USA FREEDOM Act to … Continue reading

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on D.Md.: Gov’t justified its NSL in this case in classified filings; nondisclosure provision here survives First Amendment scrutiny

Three on fair probability of evidence in the home: two for drugs, other for counterfeit wine

The affidavit for the search warrant showed a fair probability that drugs would be found at defendant’s home, based largely on the officer’s experience that drug dealers usually do keep it at home. United States v. Brandon, 2015 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on Three on fair probability of evidence in the home: two for drugs, other for counterfeit wine

CA8: Tasering suspected armed and dangerous arrestee was subject to qualified immunity, even when it turned out officers were reasonably mistaken as to ID of suspect

U.S. Marshals reasonably believed the plaintiff was a wanted armed and dangerous felon. He backed away and refused to submit to arrest and was Tasered. “We have since confirmed that ‘non-violent, non-fleeing subjects have a clearly established right to be … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: Tasering suspected armed and dangerous arrestee was subject to qualified immunity, even when it turned out officers were reasonably mistaken as to ID of suspect

S.D.Cal.: Dog alert shown not reliable in an immigration checkpoint case

“In this case, the Highway 86 checkpoint [at El Centro, CA] is a permanent checkpoint operated solely by Border Patrol agents. During the past three year period, there were approximately 1,746 apprehensions at the checkpoint, including 1,579 immigration-related apprehensions and … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Dog alert shown not reliable in an immigration checkpoint case

FL5: Putting down a backpack when told to by officer was hardly an abandonment

While officer safety is important, it doesn’t always justify a search. The officer told defendant to put down his backpack, and that was not an abandonment of the backpack. Rather, it was submission to authority. There was no legal justification … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Consent | Comments Off on FL5: Putting down a backpack when told to by officer was hardly an abandonment

OH4: Dog alert here conflated into RS question

Defendant was stopped for following too close and the state trooper found that she had a territorially limited DL, and she was outside the territory. He remembered her from a prior drug investigation and called for a drug dog. The … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH4: Dog alert here conflated into RS question