Daily Archives: December 5, 2015

OH4: No answer during a knock-and-talk permitted officers to go to the back door to knock

A knock-and-talk that goes unanswered permits the officers to go to the back door without violating Jardines, following Miller v. State, 342 Ark. 213, 27 S.W.3d 427 (2002). There they smelled a chemical odor. State v. Ash, 2015-Ohio-4974, 2015 Ohio … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Curtilage, Knock and talk | Comments Off on OH4: No answer during a knock-and-talk permitted officers to go to the back door to knock

NY3: Admin. search for counterfeit cigarette tax stamps was factually justified and reasonable

“Inasmuch as defendant was ‘operating a retail outlet where cigarettes were sold openly and notoriously[, the investigators were authorized] … to enter the premises and inspect the cigarettes for possible fraudulent stamping.’” They can’t forcibly enter, but they can insist … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on NY3: Admin. search for counterfeit cigarette tax stamps was factually justified and reasonable

ND: Consent to look in the trunk for drugs means the luggage can be searched, too

Defendants were coming from Washington which the officer knew had legalized personal use of marijuana [talk about pretext], so he made a traffic stop. The driver consented to a search, and labels of edible marijuana were seen in the trunk. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Exclusionary rule, Scope of search | Comments Off on ND: Consent to look in the trunk for drugs means the luggage can be searched, too