Daily Archives: December 6, 2015

N.D.Ga.: Authority to seize electronic media during search implicitly includes searching it later, if need be

A warrant for seizure of electronic media in a house carries with it authority to search it once it’s seized. Here, it was computers and cell phones. “Defendant’s Motion to Suppress [15] raises two questions: first, whether this warrant, which … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Scope of search | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Authority to seize electronic media during search implicitly includes searching it later, if need be

Thrillist: A Sketchy Hidden Map in Your iPhone Tracks Everywhere You’ve Been

Thrillist: A Sketchy Hidden Map in Your Iphone Tracks Everywhere You’ve Been by Joe McGauley: It’s no secret that Apple has been collecting location data from users for years. But who knew it was so insanely detailed, or how easily … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on Thrillist: A Sketchy Hidden Map in Your iPhone Tracks Everywhere You’ve Been

A.F.Ct.Crim.App.: Spousal privilege as hearsay doesn’t prevent SW from issuing

Under United States v. Lovell, 8 M.J. 613 (A.F.C.M.R. 1979), “testimonial privilege conferred by Mil. R. Evid. 504 does not extend to preventing a spouse from furnishing evidence which provides probable cause for authorizing a search. This precedent would have … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on A.F.Ct.Crim.App.: Spousal privilege as hearsay doesn’t prevent SW from issuing

CA9 narrows the Heck bar even more; and attendees of a party had no standing to challenge a police entry

In a § 1983 lawsuit over an LAPD entry into a warehouse to break up a music party that resulted in an arrest of a few for resisting, the individual plaintiffs who were attendees of the party lacked standing to … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Standing | Comments Off on CA9 narrows the Heck bar even more; and attendees of a party had no standing to challenge a police entry

OH2: Def was illegally detained to induce him to give up his DNA, and his statement was suppressed

Defendant was illegally detained in an effort to get him to give up his DNA. The officer got him to go down to the stationhouse, but it wasn’t by consent. His statement was suppressed. State v. Armstead, 2015-Ohio-5010, 2015 Ohio … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent | Comments Off on OH2: Def was illegally detained to induce him to give up his DNA, and his statement was suppressed