Three on fair probability of evidence in the home: two for drugs, other for counterfeit wine

The affidavit for the search warrant showed a fair probability that drugs would be found at defendant’s home, based largely on the officer’s experience that drug dealers usually do keep it at home. United States v. Brandon, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 171432 (S.D.Ga. Dec. 4, 2015).

The court ordered GPS tracker was used to locate defendant’s residence for a search warrant and a wiretap to connect him to drug sales. United States v. Avalo, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170744 (N.D.Ga. Nov. 20, 2015).*

Defendant was convicted of mail and wire fraud for selling fine counterfeit wines and sentenced to 120 months. The affidavit for the search warrant showed a fair probability that evidence of the scheme would be found in his house because bottles of the counterfeit wine were seen there the day before. United States v. Kurniawan, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 22293 (2d Cir. Dec. 22, 2015).

This entry was posted in Nexus, Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.