Category Archives: Staleness

D.Md.: Even with MJ decrim, smell of MJ from a vehicle is still PC by statute and state case law

According to the state courts and statute, the smell of marijuana from a van was still probable cause in Maryland despite decriminalization. The search of the vehicle and a backpack within was thus lawful. United States v. Palacio, 2019 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Md.: Even with MJ decrim, smell of MJ from a vehicle is still PC by statute and state case law

E.D.N.C.: On a video that’s integral to the PC, the reliability of the time stamp isn’t to be inquired into or it becomes a “hypertechnical” review

Defendant was on a surveillance video 33 days before a search warrant was sought for the weapon since he was a felon. The warrant was not stale because people almost always keep firearms for a long time. Defendant’s challenge to … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Burden of pleading, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: On a video that’s integral to the PC, the reliability of the time stamp isn’t to be inquired into or it becomes a “hypertechnical” review

E.D.Mich.: Broad SW for cell phone photos was reasonable because of how they’re stored

A broad search warrant for photographs on a cell phone was reasonable because that’s the only way the photos can be searched. In addition, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Hawkins, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 214030 (E.D. Mich. … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Broad SW for cell phone photos was reasonable because of how they’re stored

D.V.I.: GFE applies to searches before the court held U.S. to V.I. packages weren’t border searches

Applying its prior Baxter case, the District of the Virgin Islands holds that the border search exception doesn’t apply to mail and packages shipped from the Continental U.S. The searches here, however, predated Baxter, so the good faith exception applies. … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Good faith exception, Staleness | Comments Off on D.V.I.: GFE applies to searches before the court held U.S. to V.I. packages weren’t border searches

E.D.Pa.: Length of def’s participation in DTO undermines his staleness argument

There was probable cause defendant was a major player in a DTO, and that his participation went on for months. This, he concedes, undermines his staleness argument. United States v. Williams, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 211403 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 6, … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Length of def’s participation in DTO undermines his staleness argument

CA9: Three-month-old information about where probationer lived wasn’t stale for probation search

Probation officers could rely on a three-month-old list that showed defendant’s brother lived there and he was on probation. The list was not stale because there was no suggestion the brother’s tenancy was transitory. Defendant’s claim the probation search as … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Mail and packages, Probation / Parole search, Staleness | Comments Off on CA9: Three-month-old information about where probationer lived wasn’t stale for probation search

OR: Ten-year-old information in a SW for evidence of child sexual abuse wasn’t stale

Defendant was convicted of 11 counts of child sexual abuse from acts that occurred at a gymnastic business that had sleepovers of young female gymnasts. In making its case, the state used ten-year-old information in a search warrant application for … Continue reading →

Posted in Staleness | Comments Off on OR: Ten-year-old information in a SW for evidence of child sexual abuse wasn’t stale

E.D.Mich.: Def’s giving false name justifies extending stop

Defendant’s giving a false name extended the stop and added to the reasonable suspicion to detain him after his true identity was discovered. United States v. Jackson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188225 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 30, 2019). The affidavit for … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Def’s giving false name justifies extending stop

IN: SW obtained off of lost drone video wasn’t stale when it was only about four days

A lady found a drone in her yard, and she was already concerned about people flying drones over her house. A computer memory card was in the drone. She looked at it, and called the police and turned it over. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Staleness | Comments Off on IN: SW obtained off of lost drone video wasn’t stale when it was only about four days

CA7: PC to arrest doesn’t usually go stale

Probable cause to arrest doesn’t go stale like probable cause to search does. “Haldorson’s primary contention is that the information from the controlled buy was too stale three weeks later to support probable cause for an arrest. The mere passage … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Staleness | Comments Off on CA7: PC to arrest doesn’t usually go stale

N.D.Cal.: Arrest warrants don’t grow stale like SWs

The officer had probable cause to arrest defendant and conduct a search incident to arrest. Thus, the question of probation search is moot. The passage of time (here a little over two months) between knowledge of the arrest warrant and … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Immigration arrests, Staleness | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Arrest warrants don’t grow stale like SWs

OH5: Staleness argument fails as to ongoing MJ grow operation

Information about a marijuana grow operation was ongoing by its nature, so staleness is more flexible as to it and information can be older. Also, the good faith exception would apply. State v. Laubacher, 2019-Ohio-4271, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 4343 … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on OH5: Staleness argument fails as to ongoing MJ grow operation

TN: Possession of meth in truck many months earlier wasn’t PC to believe it’s there now

Defendant’s alleged possession of methamphetamine in his truck many months earlier was not probable cause to believe it could still be there at the time of the search. Defendant’s possession of a meth pipe, however, gave cause to search the … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on TN: Possession of meth in truck many months earlier wasn’t PC to believe it’s there now

E.D.Tenn.: Alleged quantity of drugs can help overcome a staleness argument

“In conjunction with these [in the totality of] circumstances, Houser and Williams’ statements against their penal interest were sufficient to reasonably assure the magistrate that the information they provided was reliable.” While the fact defendant was dealing drugs from a … Continue reading →

Posted in Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Alleged quantity of drugs can help overcome a staleness argument

CA5: USMJ didn’t need to be told in SW application that the computer was small and portable; that’s usually obvious

Six months was not too stale in a child pornography case where the court has approved much longer delays. “The magistrate judge did not need to be told that electronic devices are often small and portable or that they might … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Staleness | Comments Off on CA5: USMJ didn’t need to be told in SW application that the computer was small and portable; that’s usually obvious

E.D.Mo.: Older information in SW application substantiated by CI information from day before; not stale

Parts of the information were old, but the search warrant was not stale because a critical part of the affidavit showed that there was credible reason to believe drugs would be found there because of the CI’s observation the day … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Older information in SW application substantiated by CI information from day before; not stale

W.D.N.C.: Omitted facts for Franks purposes are intentional in one sense, but not presumably intentionally misleading

Omitted facts for Franks purposes are intentional in one sense, but not presumably intentionally misleading. Not every thing the affiant knows makes it in there. Also, citizen informant’s statement defendant was seen with a gun five weeks before the search … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Staleness | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Omitted facts for Franks purposes are intentional in one sense, but not presumably intentionally misleading

D.N.M.: SW wasn’t stale; def was doing enough to show his conduct was ongoing, and the officers didn’t even know he’d moved just before the raid

The search warrant was not stale. While there was reference to activities three months before the warrant was issued, defendant was seen coming and going from the location on the way to do drug transactions with a known drug dealer … Continue reading →

Posted in Staleness | Comments Off on D.N.M.: SW wasn’t stale; def was doing enough to show his conduct was ongoing, and the officers didn’t even know he’d moved just before the raid

D.Kan.: Recusal motion can’t be used as subterfuge just to get rehearing of denied motion to suppress

This second recusal motion looks like defendant is just trying to get rehearing of the denial of his motion to suppress in front of a different judge, and it’s denied. United States v. Williamson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133111 (D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Staleness, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Recusal motion can’t be used as subterfuge just to get rehearing of denied motion to suppress

E.D.Pa.: Information from a Sept. ’17 SW made it into Oct. ’18 SW affidavit and it wasn’t stale becuase of ongoing nature

Defendant’s property had been searched in September 2017. Information from that made it to a search warrant issued in October 2018, and it wasn’t stale because of the ongoing nature of the facts. United States v. Harmon, 2019 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Information from a Sept. ’17 SW made it into Oct. ’18 SW affidavit and it wasn’t stale becuase of ongoing nature