D.Kan.: Recusal motion can’t be used as subterfuge just to get rehearing of denied motion to suppress

This second recusal motion looks like defendant is just trying to get rehearing of the denial of his motion to suppress in front of a different judge, and it’s denied. United States v. Williamson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133111 (D. Kan. Aug. 8, 2019).

The stop was prolonged with reasonable suspicion on the totality. Part of it was six month old information of drug trafficking, but, coupled with what they were seeing, that tended to show a potential pattern. United States v. Thompson, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 23665 (5th Cir. Aug. 8, 2019).*

Fourth Amendment false imprisonment claim accrues when arraigned. This was filed six years later, and the statute of limitations is two. Wilson v. Reid, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 23667 (10th Cir. Aug. 8, 2019).*

This entry was posted in Reasonable suspicion, Staleness, Suppression hearings. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.