Category Archives: Arrest or entry on arrest

D.Ore.: TRO granted against arrests in Portland of journalists and legal observers without PC

TRO granted in Portland protests against arrests of journalists and legal observers without probable cause. Index Newspapers LLC v. City of Portland, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131672 (D. Ore. July 23, 2020):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on D.Ore.: TRO granted against arrests in Portland of journalists and legal observers without PC

W.D.Mo.: No const’l distinction between jailer monitoring jail calls and turning them over to prosecutors

There is no constitutional distinction between a jailer listening to calls and then forwarding them to prosecutors for use as potential evidence. United States v. Nesbitt, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131220 (W.D. Mo. July 24, 2020). Officer’s statement that a … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: No const’l distinction between jailer monitoring jail calls and turning them over to prosecutors

WaPo: The federal police in Portland don’t even understand what ‘arrests’ are

WaPo: The federal police in Portland don’t even understand what ‘arrests’ are by Prof. By Andrew Manuel Crespo (“The government cannot lawfully exercise its power of arrest if it doesn’t realize it is, in fact, arresting people in the first … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on WaPo: The federal police in Portland don’t even understand what ‘arrests’ are

CA7: Unreasonable administrative delay in releasing pretrial detainees entitled to release violates 4A

Unreasonable administrative delay in getting people out of jail that are entitled to it violates the Fourth Amendment under Gerstein and County of Riverside. Williams v. Dart, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 23132 (7th Cir. July 23, 2020):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA7: Unreasonable administrative delay in releasing pretrial detainees entitled to release violates 4A

Law and Crime: Two DHS Officials Apparently Just Admitted Their Troops Have Been Violating the Constitution

Law and Crime: Two DHS Officials Apparently Just Admitted Their Troops Have Been Violating the Constitution by Colin Kalmbacher (“Acting Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Chad Wolf and one of his subordinates appear to have admitted their agents have … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on Law and Crime: Two DHS Officials Apparently Just Admitted Their Troops Have Been Violating the Constitution

CA8: Mistake of name in SW affidavit deleted by district court wasn’t material

The affidavit for search warrant here originally used the name “Aaren” but the officer found “Taylor” could be the last name, and the affidavit was changed for that. It turned out that there were two people. The district court properly … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA8: Mistake of name in SW affidavit deleted by district court wasn’t material

W.D.Mo.: Def’s arrest at door in underwear permitted protective sweep before getting his clothes

Defendant was arrested in his house on a cold and dreary day. He answered the door in his underwear. Officers were permitted to conduct a protective sweep before getting his clothing for transport because at least one other person expected … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Def’s arrest at door in underwear permitted protective sweep before getting his clothes

Rolling Stone: How Oregon Is Pushing Back Against ‘Kidnap and False Arrest’ by Trump’s Agents

Rolling Stone: How Oregon Is Pushing Back Against ‘Kidnap and False Arrest’ by Trump’s Agents by Tim Dickinson (“As state decries constitutional abuses by federal officers, Trump threatens to impose tactics nationally”)

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on Rolling Stone: How Oregon Is Pushing Back Against ‘Kidnap and False Arrest’ by Trump’s Agents

Mother Jones: Trump Plans to Expand Federal Invasion of American Cities

Mother Jones: Trump Plans to Expand Federal Invasion of American Cities (“‘You’ll see something rolled out this week,’ chief of staff says.”) Update: ABAJ: Oregon sues US agencies over protest arrests; what gave feds authority to intervene? by Debra Cassens … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on Mother Jones: Trump Plans to Expand Federal Invasion of American Cities

CNN: US attorney requests DHS investigation after video shows masked, camouflaged federal authorities arresting protesters in Portland

CNN: US attorney requests DHS investigation after video shows masked, camouflaged federal authorities arresting protesters in Portland by Amir Vera, Konstantin Toropin & Josh Campbell (“The US Attorney for the Oregon District on Friday requested an investigation into masked, camouflaged … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CNN: US attorney requests DHS investigation after video shows masked, camouflaged federal authorities arresting protesters in Portland

Oregon Public Broadcasting: Federal Law Enforcement Use Unmarked Vehicles To Grab Protesters Off Portland Streets

OPB: Federal Law Enforcement Use Unmarked Vehicles To Grab Protesters Off Portland Streets by Jonathan Levinson & Conrad Wilson:

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on Oregon Public Broadcasting: Federal Law Enforcement Use Unmarked Vehicles To Grab Protesters Off Portland Streets

DC: Entry on arrest warrant was limited to protective sweep, but here it was a full search

U.S. Marshals entered defendant’s home on an arrest warrant and, instead of just securing it, they succeeded in searching it, too. The search violated the Fourth Amendment and is suppressed. Green v. United States, 2020 D.C. App. LEXIS 240 (July … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Protective sweep | Comments Off on DC: Entry on arrest warrant was limited to protective sweep, but here it was a full search

IN: Def’s sitting inside in front of open door visible outside had reduced REP compared to exigency for his arrest

Defendant’s door was wide open, and officers could see him sitting inside directly in front of the door. They had an arrest warrant for him. Based on the “particular facts” here, officers had exigency combined with defendant’s reasonable expectation of … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on IN: Def’s sitting inside in front of open door visible outside had reduced REP compared to exigency for his arrest

CA6: When target of an IRS summons is named, it’s not a “John Doe summons”

“There is no shortage of reasons to reject Byers’s argument. But her argument, we acknowledge, has intuitive appeal—‘Shouldn’t the government have to give a reason why it wants my information?’—and merits this fulsome response. In all, Byers has raised a … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on CA6: When target of an IRS summons is named, it’s not a “John Doe summons”

Cal.1: Despite the pandemic, arrestees are entitled to a prompt judicial determination of PC

Despite the pandemic and court closures, arrestees are entitled to a prompt judicial determination of probable cause under Gerstein. Bullock v. Superior Court, 2020 Cal. App. LEXIS 575 (1st Dist. June 24, 2020). During a search of defendant’s house under … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause | Comments Off on Cal.1: Despite the pandemic, arrestees are entitled to a prompt judicial determination of PC

OH9: Def’s observed association with wanted fugitive permitted his seizure at time of fugitive’s arrest, too.

Defendant was in a car wash and the USM fugitive task force was tailing a person in another car at the car wash. That person came over to defendant’s car and spoke to him. When the person being surveilled started … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Plain view, feel, smell, Seizure | Comments Off on OH9: Def’s observed association with wanted fugitive permitted his seizure at time of fugitive’s arrest, too.

GA: Officer’s request for consent to search didn’t require Miranda warning

Defendant’s questions about his arrest and the officer’s request for consent did not require a Miranda warning. State v. Pauldo, 2020 Ga. LEXIS 447 (June 16, 2020). N.9:

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent | Comments Off on GA: Officer’s request for consent to search didn’t require Miranda warning

NY: CBP officer at least was conducting a citizen’s arrest when he stopped def and turned him over to local police

A CBP maritime officer is not a LEO under NYS law but that didn’t void his stopping a vehicle while on duty in Buffalo for driving erratically. Buffalo officers were called, and he left to go back to work. They … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Standing | Comments Off on NY: CBP officer at least was conducting a citizen’s arrest when he stopped def and turned him over to local police

E.D.Ark.: “After editing out the incomplete and false portions of the warrant affidavit, the remaining information was insufficient to establish” PC

“After editing out the incomplete and false portions of the warrant affidavit, the remaining information was insufficient to establish that Green was dead and that his death was caused by the criminal act of another person. Accordingly, the Court finds … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: “After editing out the incomplete and false portions of the warrant affidavit, the remaining information was insufficient to establish” PC

OH5: Trial court’s finding of officer’s credibility where dashcam didn’t help was binding on appeal

The dashcam video was inconclusive on whether defendant stopped, but the trial court credited the officer, and that’s binding on the court of appeals. State v. Blasingame, 2020-Ohio-3087, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 2029 (5th Dist. May 21, 2020).* Two dashcam … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity, Standards of review | Comments Off on OH5: Trial court’s finding of officer’s credibility where dashcam didn’t help was binding on appeal