Category Archives: Informant hearsay

TN: 2012 cell phone search had to be evaluated by law at that time on PCR

Defendant’s post-conviction claim on the 2012 search of his cell phone fails because it wouldn’t have been granted back then. Blunkall v. State, 2019 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 11 (Jan. 4, 2019).* The CI’s information was significantly corroborated by observations … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on TN: 2012 cell phone search had to be evaluated by law at that time on PCR

W.D.N.C.: Defendant has standing in rental car under Byrd but loses under GFE under binding circuit law

On remand from the Fourth Circuit, the court determines that Byrd applies and defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the car he rented. As for the good faith exception, the court finds that it is bound by circuit … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Defendant has standing in rental car under Byrd but loses under GFE under binding circuit law

D.Neb.: Google’s email search was a private search and NCMEC didn’t expand it

Google and NCMEC did not conduct Fourth Amendment searches when they encountered child pornography tied to his email account. They did private searches for their own purposes, and NCMEC did not expand Google’s private search. United States v. Ringland, 2019 … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Private search | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Google’s email search was a private search and NCMEC didn’t expand it

D.Nev.: CI’s alleged (and unsupported) false statement isn’t a Franks violation; has to be the affiant’s

Defendant claims a Franks violation because the CI is believed to be Rudnick, and Rudnick has credibility problems. Defendant doesn’t allege what is false to even get a hearing. Besides, Rudnick is the CI and not the affiant. Denied. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.Nev.: CI’s alleged (and unsupported) false statement isn’t a Franks violation; has to be the affiant’s

D.S.C.: CI not sufficiently corroborated for PC for a vehicle search

Defendant was stopped for an alleged window tint violation, but the officer also relied on information from a CI from days before the stop that he thought was probable cause. The government had a dog sniff during the stop, but … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.S.C.: CI not sufficiently corroborated for PC for a vehicle search

E.D.Tenn.: CI on the controlled buy wasn’t an “active participant” in the crime

The CI’s participation in the controlled buy that led to a search warrant doesn’t make the CI an “active participant” in the crime where that’s only the basis for issuance of the warrant and it’s not a separate charge. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: CI on the controlled buy wasn’t an “active participant” in the crime

PA: GPS tracker and audio recorder worn by CI for safety reasons not prohibited by Jones or 4A

The CI had a recorder and GPS tracking device placed on him for his safety while he was riding with the defendant. This is not a “tracking device” under state statute or Jones because it wasn’t planted on defendant’s property, … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on PA: GPS tracker and audio recorder worn by CI for safety reasons not prohibited by Jones or 4A

Cal.: Jailhouse writings could be seized with SW to prove def’s competence at trial

A search warrant was executed on defendant’s jail cell on the eve of trial and produced writings that refuted defendant’s claim of incompetence to understand the proceedings. They were admissible. People v. Buenrostro, 2018 Cal. LEXIS 9384 (Dec. 3, 2018).* … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on Cal.: Jailhouse writings could be seized with SW to prove def’s competence at trial

IN: Female CI doing a controlled buy is allegedly digitally penetrated by def looking for recorder, and he’s charged with rape

No search issue here; just a cautionary tale for police: A female CI came in for a controlled buy on defendant. He feared she was wired and made her strip to her underwear, and she did. Then he told her … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on IN: Female CI doing a controlled buy is allegedly digitally penetrated by def looking for recorder, and he’s charged with rape

N.D.Cal.: SW to Skype produced no verifiable information ptf was account user; no PC for a SW based on that information

A search warrant to Skype that produced vague information about its account holder that essentially could have been anyone because there was no verification by Skype was insufficient to show probable cause, and plaintiffs get summary judgment on that question. … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: SW to Skype produced no verifiable information ptf was account user; no PC for a SW based on that information

D.N.M.: Failure to mention the CI’s criminal history is less important when the affidavit shows extensive corroboration

Failure to mention the CI’s criminal history is less important when the affidavit shows extensive corroboration. The Franks challenge fails. United States v. Martinez, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 192181 (D. N.M. Nov. 9, 2018). Defendant had standing to challenge the … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Standing | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Failure to mention the CI’s criminal history is less important when the affidavit shows extensive corroboration

S.D.N.Y.: Emails from CIs provided PC, and the SW was limited to categories of information

A CI gave emails to government investigators about health care fraud. They and other information provided probable cause for more emails. The warrants were particularized by being limited to eight categories. United States v. Mathieu, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 192281 … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail, Informant hearsay, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Emails from CIs provided PC, and the SW was limited to categories of information

CA8: Means and opportunity to commit bank robbery and carjacking in flight was PC

Defendant’s means and opportunity to commit this bank robbery and carjacking in flight was probable cause. Video showing him at a motel was nexus to his room. United States v. Evans, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 31326 (8th Cir. Nov. 6, … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA8: Means and opportunity to commit bank robbery and carjacking in flight was PC

N.D.Ohio: Thermal imaging SW was based on probable cause because CI corroborated

“The Chardon Municipal Court Judge had a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause existed in issuing the warrant for a thermal image search of 7071 Ledge. The Government must obtain a search warrant before use of thermal imaging equipment … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Thermal imaging SW was based on probable cause because CI corroborated

W.D.Ky.: Rodriguez doesn’t start to apply until the stop occurs

Defendant was surveilled in a funeral home at a funeral, and he was stopped later. Rodriguez does not apply before the stop actually occurred. United States v. Thompson, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185267 (W.D. Ky. Oct. 30, 2018). “Such specific … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Rodriguez doesn’t start to apply until the stop occurs

W.D.N.Y.: Controlled buys corroborate CI

The CI wasn’t supported by past history, but was by controlled buys. United States v. Williams, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180895 (W.D. N.Y. Oct. 23, 2018). “Finally, the affidavit articulated a reasonable nexus between the place to be searched (the … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Nexus | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Controlled buys corroborate CI

CA10: Body camera video showed consent, and it was a far more congenial sounding conversation than the transcript read

The body camera video shows defendant’s mother consented to the search of the premises, and it is noticeably less allegedly coercive sounding than the transcript. United States v. Morris, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 29830 (10th Cir. Oct. 23, 2018). The … Continue reading →

Posted in Body cameras, Consent, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA10: Body camera video showed consent, and it was a far more congenial sounding conversation than the transcript read

S.D.N.Y.: PCR claim that officer lied about CI eight years earlier wasn’t actual innocence claim

Defendant’s 2018 post-conviction claim that the officer lied about the existence of a CI in 2010 wasn’t cognizable now because he doesn’t claim actual innocence. Edmonson v. United States, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181045 (S.D. N.Y. Oct. 19, 2018):

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: PCR claim that officer lied about CI eight years earlier wasn’t actual innocence claim

VT: A CI who is already in trouble with the police has an interest in truthfulness, and thus is likely more reliable

Statements against penal interest by CIs that are already in trouble are logically going to hurt the CI more if they turn out to be false, so the CI has an interest in being truthful. Reliability may thus be inferred … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on VT: A CI who is already in trouble with the police has an interest in truthfulness, and thus is likely more reliable

MI: Controlled buys and corroborated CI was PC

The trial court erred in suppressing the search under the search warrant. There were controlled buys and a corroborated informant, and that was enough for probable cause. People v. Higgins, 2018 Mich. App. LEXIS 3355 (Oct. 18, 2018). Defendant’s right … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MI: Controlled buys and corroborated CI was PC