Category Archives: Stop and frisk

IN: Having def manipulate his clothing and remove his shoes was a search, not a safety frisk for weapons

The search of defendant was not for officer safety where the officer told defendant to move his clothing around because, if he was armed, he would be putting his hands on the weapon. The order to remove his shoes also … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IN: Having def manipulate his clothing and remove his shoes was a search, not a safety frisk for weapons

D.Me.: Govt failed to prove frisk was for safety reasons; it was really a search for drugs without RS

The officers didn’t testify to a safety reason for a frisk, and the dashcam video did not support it either. Moreover, this was not a frisk for weapons; it was a search for drugs and it was without reasonable suspicion. … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.Me.: Govt failed to prove frisk was for safety reasons; it was really a search for drugs without RS

WaPo: Mike Bloomberg ignored early evidence that ‘stop-and-frisk’ could be racially biased

WaPo: Mike Bloomberg ignored early evidence that ‘stop-and-frisk’ could be racially biased by Victor Ray:

Posted in Pretext, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on WaPo: Mike Bloomberg ignored early evidence that ‘stop-and-frisk’ could be racially biased

CA9: When arresting a vehicle passenger on a felony warrant, a frisk of others in the car is permissible for officer safety

When executing a felony arrest warrant on an occupant of a car, frisking companions in the car is reasonable for officer safety. United States v. Abbassi, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 3575 (9th Cir. Feb. 4, 2020). “In her informal brief … Continue reading

Posted in Scope of search, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA9: When arresting a vehicle passenger on a felony warrant, a frisk of others in the car is permissible for officer safety

D.C.App. discusses “automatic companion” rule but concludes it doesn’t apply

The D.C. Court of Appeals discusses the scope of the automatic companion rule and finds that it doesn’t have to decide that issue here. There was reasonable suspicion for the companion’s patdown. Jenkins v. District of Columbia, 2020 D.C. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.C.App. discusses “automatic companion” rule but concludes it doesn’t apply

MA: Def’s frisk during his traffic stop was unjustified and unreasonable

The granting of defendant’s motion to suppress is affirmed. Although the stop of his vehicle was proper, his frisk was improper as was the search of his car which was based on the results of the improper frisk. Defendant’s actions … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MA: Def’s frisk during his traffic stop was unjustified and unreasonable

NYTimes: ‘I Was Wrong,’ Bloomberg Says. But This Policy Still Haunts Him.

NYTimes: ‘I Was Wrong,’ Bloomberg Says. But This Policy Still Haunts Him. By Emma G. Fitzsimmons and Joseph Goldstein (“After defending the stop-and-frisk policing tactic, the former mayor apologized. But black voters in the Democratic presidential race may not forgive … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on NYTimes: ‘I Was Wrong,’ Bloomberg Says. But This Policy Still Haunts Him.

N.D.Ind.: Def’s frisk was based on guilt by association and wasn’t for safety purposes

Defendant’s friend was involved in passing counterfeit $20 bills in a casino as viewed on video. The government, however, had no reasonable suspicion that defendant was actually involved in the scheme, so his frisk was unreasonable. Defendant’s frisk was investigatory … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Def’s frisk was based on guilt by association and wasn’t for safety purposes

NY2: Pawnbrokers are “pervasively regulated” under 4A

Pawnbrokers are “pervasively regulated” for consumer protection. City of Los Angeles v. Patel is way different because that industry was not so regulated. Collateral Loanbrokers Assn. of N.Y., Inc. v City of New York, 2019 NY Slip Op 09354, 2019 … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Overbreadth, Particularity, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on NY2: Pawnbrokers are “pervasively regulated” under 4A

S.D.Tex.: Anonymous 911 call brought police to local store; seizures and patdowns were without RS

An anonymous 911 call about suspicious men in a small town store brought police. Because the town was small, it was easy to identify strangers, and the officers encountered them inside the store and brought them out. Ultimately there was … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Anonymous 911 call brought police to local store; seizures and patdowns were without RS

IN: Frisk was justified by RS, but “ball” in pocket wasn’t plain feel

The officer was observing defendant and suspected he’d be engaged in a drug transaction. Finally there was a patdown, and in defendant’s pocket was a small ball of something, which the officer reached for. It was obvious it was not … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IN: Frisk was justified by RS, but “ball” in pocket wasn’t plain feel

D.N.M.: A SW for CP doesn’t need to be limited to only devices on the premises police think were used; all can be searched

In a search warrant for child pornography, the warrant does not have to attempt to be limited to the only devices that the officers think downloaded the images; all devices on the premises can be searched, following codefendant’s case, United … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.N.M.: A SW for CP doesn’t need to be limited to only devices on the premises police think were used; all can be searched

FL1: Patdown for drugs permitted cutting hole in def’s underwear to retrieve that which wouldn’t fall out

The officer smelled the strong odor in defendant’s car and got him out. There was the strong odor on defendant’s person, too. A patdown revealed a lump under defendant’s shorts. The officer tried to shake it loose and couldn’t. He … Continue reading

Posted in Scope of search, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on FL1: Patdown for drugs permitted cutting hole in def’s underwear to retrieve that which wouldn’t fall out

DC: Telling def to put his hands on the wall for a patdown was a seizure and wasn’t consensual

Telling defendant to put his hands against the wall and assume the position for a patdown was a seizure, and here it was without probable cause. It was not consensual. Dozier v. United States, 2019 D.C. App. LEXIS 495 (Dec. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Seizure, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on DC: Telling def to put his hands on the wall for a patdown was a seizure and wasn’t consensual

The Hour: ‘Stop-and-frisk’ can work, under careful supervision

The Hour: ‘Stop-and-frisk’ can work, under careful supervision by Henry F. Fradella:

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on The Hour: ‘Stop-and-frisk’ can work, under careful supervision

E.D.N.C.: “[R]easonable suspicion need not rule out the possibility of innocent conduct.” Navarette

A brief meeting for what could only be described by the officer, in his experience, was likely a hand-to-hand sale in a high crime area reasonable suspicion for a stop. “Other suggested explanations by defendant, such as that defendant may … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: “[R]easonable suspicion need not rule out the possibility of innocent conduct.” Navarette

MI: 4A not violated by taking of fingerprints and photographs during a Terry stop

Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment rights were not violated by police officers taking their photographs and fingerprints based on reasonable suspicion during valid Terry stops, because plaintiffs had no reasonable expectation of privacy in physical characteristics that were constantly exposed to the … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MI: 4A not violated by taking of fingerprints and photographs during a Terry stop

CA2: BIA erred in not suppressing; a prima facie case of an egregious violation of the 4A was shown because it was apparently race based stop and there was virtually no PC

BIA erred by denying petitioner’s motion to suppress evidence of his alleged alienage. He made out a prima facie case of an egregious violation of his constitutional rights where the evidence tended to show a racial animus in the planning … Continue reading

Posted in Immigration arrests, Pretext, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA2: BIA erred in not suppressing; a prima facie case of an egregious violation of the 4A was shown because it was apparently race based stop and there was virtually no PC

CA9: Shaking a fanny pack rather than searching it was reasonable during a stop-and-frisk

Shaking defendant’s fanny pack to see if there was a weapon rather than opening it was reasonable as a part of stop and frisk. United States v. Elenes, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 33067 (9th Cir. Nov. 5, 2019). Officers could … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Knock and talk, Protective sweep, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA9: Shaking a fanny pack rather than searching it was reasonable during a stop-and-frisk

E.D.Pa.: The officer responding to a bank robbery call finding two men matching the description near the bank was reasonable in stopping and handcuffing them

“Accordingly, we find that based on Dougherty’s experience and familiarity with the area, and the totality of the circumstances known to him as he responded to a dispatch describing two African American males at least one of whom was armed, … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: The officer responding to a bank robbery call finding two men matching the description near the bank was reasonable in stopping and handcuffing them