D.P.R.: A shed on the curtilage was within scope of SW

It was reasonable for officers to search a shed on the curtilage; it was within the scope of the search warrant. United States v. Torres-Benitez, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165162 (D.P.R. July 24, 2026).

The CI said he could get drugs off defendant, and the police used electronic surveillance to monitor the transactions. That was probable cause. People v. Dacosta, 2026 NY Slip Op 04532, 2026 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4752 (3rd Dept. July 23, 2026).*

Not providing counsel before a BAC blood draw is not a structural error. State v. Stempel, 2026 Ariz. App. LEXIS 145 (July 24, 2026).*

There was probable cause and nexus to defendant’s computer for CSAM based on it having TOR browsing software for secrecy and admissions defendant made. State v. Quam, 2026 ND 145 (July 24, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Curtilage, Drug or alcohol testing, Probable cause, Scope of search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.