Category Archives: Emergency / exigency

E.D.Ky.: It was reasonable for officers to open a car door when the driver was parked and unresponsive

Defendant’s car was parked on a Waffle House parking lot from 2-5 am with the headlights on, and it was reasonable for officers to check on the car. Inside was defendant who didn’t respond to them, and it was reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: It was reasonable for officers to open a car door when the driver was parked and unresponsive

MT: Knock-and-talk led to forced entry based on exigency of officers being made

A Montana DTF was tipped off to defendant bringing a cache of heroin to a motel to distribute. Officers set up surveillance and recognized local drug dealers coming and going. They called for uniformed backup and attempted a knock-and-talk which … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Knock and talk | Comments Off on MT: Knock-and-talk led to forced entry based on exigency of officers being made

VA: Fear of suicide attempt objectively justified warrantless entry as facts developed

Officers had an objectively reasonable basis for an entry and sweep under the emergency aid exception. Defendant was reportedly suicidal, wasn’t communicating at first, and then strange sounds were coming from where he was. “Based on these troubling circumstances, the … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Seizure | Comments Off on VA: Fear of suicide attempt objectively justified warrantless entry as facts developed

LA: No PC for warrantless entry and security cameras are not exigency

“Here, the trial court made credibility determinations based on the testimony of multiple officers involved in defendant’s arrest and found that officers lacked probable cause to search defendant’s residence. Furthermore, observation that defendant’s home had security cameras failed to amount … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on LA: No PC for warrantless entry and security cameras are not exigency

CA9: Protective sweep of house after medical emergency at front door unjustified

Officers responded to a medical emergency at the entryway of defendant’s house. They ended up conducting a protective sweep for which there was no justification whatsoever. The firearm found in the protective sweep is suppressed. United States v. Gonzalez-Martin, 2020 … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Protective sweep of house after medical emergency at front door unjustified

E.D.Mich.: Email SW signed on SignNow app valid

An email search warrant signed by the issuing judge on a tablet with the SignNow app was valid. United States v. Lantzy, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50057 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 24, 2020). “We conclude that the circumstances here were such … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Email SW signed on SignNow app valid

NM: “Is there anything on your person that I should know about?” is subject to Quarles public safety exception

A question about anything on defendant’s person was subject to Quarles public safety exception. “While Defendant was in custody, but before he was advised of his Miranda rights, an officer asked him, ‘Is there anything on your person that I … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on NM: “Is there anything on your person that I should know about?” is subject to Quarles public safety exception

WY: 911 hang-up call from def’s girlfriend and def answered call back volunteering he’d never hit her, with other information, justified warrantless entry

Defendant’s girlfriend made a 911 hang-up call. When 911 called back, defendant answered the phone and volunteered he’d never hit her when she didn’t speak on the first call. Defendant was known to the police to have firearms and possible … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WY: 911 hang-up call from def’s girlfriend and def answered call back volunteering he’d never hit her, with other information, justified warrantless entry

Cal.4d1: Leaving the engine running to one’s car outside house for 30 minutes isn’t exigent circumstances

A neighbor called the police because defendant left his vehicle outside with the engine running for 30 minutes. This did not indicate an emergency justifying a warrantless entry into his casita. There were drugs in plain view. People v. Smith, … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Cal.4d1: Leaving the engine running to one’s car outside house for 30 minutes isn’t exigent circumstances

MN: Return of digital copies of attorney’s files seized by SW was only issue and now moot; legality of SW comes later

The attorney here was the target of a search warrant for all her files where the attorney was the suspect, not a client. That distinguishes O’Connor. The parties, the client interveners, and amici have briefed all kinds of constitutional arguments … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on MN: Return of digital copies of attorney’s files seized by SW was only issue and now moot; legality of SW comes later

OH3: Arrest of drug offender coming home outside his house led to officers hearing “scurrying about” inside, and that justified warrantless entry

One man under investigation for drug crimes was arrested outside a house when officers went there waiting for him to arrive. On the arrest, officers heard others inside “scurrying around” [how?]. This created exigency and justified a warrantless entry into … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on OH3: Arrest of drug offender coming home outside his house led to officers hearing “scurrying about” inside, and that justified warrantless entry

N.D.Ohio: The clear potential for violence in a volatile domestic disturbance was a continuing exigency

The clear potential for violence in a volatile domestic disturbance was exigency. “As is evident from the video, the exigency did not terminate due to the passage of time or as a result of [Off.] Sosenko’s attempts to manage the … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstention, Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: The clear potential for violence in a volatile domestic disturbance was a continuing exigency

IA: Possible presence of runaway 14 yo not exigency for warrantless entry

A runaway child was not an exigency justifying a warrantless entry into defendant’s home. “Today we must decide if a police officer may enter a third party’s residence without a search warrant based on a verbal request from the Iowa … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on IA: Possible presence of runaway 14 yo not exigency for warrantless entry

ID: Lack of objection to body cam video showing refusal of consent wasn’t plain error

The police properly seized defendant’s home to preserve evidence of murder on exigent circumstances. There was also a reasonable protective sweep. Defendant didn’t object to the body cam video that had a refusal to consent to the house search, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on ID: Lack of objection to body cam video showing refusal of consent wasn’t plain error

D.N.M.: A “manpower shortage” for seizure of possible evidence isn’t exigency without PC

Defendant consented to a search of his car and his hotel room, but not to a search of his guitar case in the room. Thinking there might be drugs there, the officer seized the guitar case to preserve the potential … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on D.N.M.: A “manpower shortage” for seizure of possible evidence isn’t exigency without PC

NH: When an overdose call is made to 911, it isn’t unreasonable for a police officer to enter with EMTs or the FD

When an overdose call is made to 911, it isn’t unreasonable for a police officer to enter with EMTs or the fire department. State v. Eldridge, 2020 N.H. LEXIS 18 (Feb. 19. 2020):

Posted in Community caretaking function, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on NH: When an overdose call is made to 911, it isn’t unreasonable for a police officer to enter with EMTs or the FD

TX3: Officer’s conviction for official oppression for exigentless warrantless entry into home affirmed

A police officer was convicted of official oppression for an entry into premises without exigent circumstances. “[W]e conclude that there is legally sufficient evidence supporting the jury’s determination that exigent circumstances did not justify the warrantless entry into Nutt’s trailer … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on TX3: Officer’s conviction for official oppression for exigentless warrantless entry into home affirmed

D.Kan.: Police responding to a shooting call did a protective sweep for other victims and saw a mushroom grow; it was a reasonable look in the room

Police and paramedics responded to a shooting call where the victim was shot through his door. While inside, police checked for other victims and saw a mushroom grow operation in a bedroom. That led to a search warrant, and the … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Police responding to a shooting call did a protective sweep for other victims and saw a mushroom grow; it was a reasonable look in the room

CA1: No exigency for warrantless entry on a DV complaint even with a known gun in the house, and unconnected to the complaint

PR police were called to a DV situation involving a police officer as a suspect. The officer’s firearm did not factor into the DV complaint, and the argument wasn’t even face-to-face. The mere fact of a gun in the house … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA1: No exigency for warrantless entry on a DV complaint even with a known gun in the house, and unconnected to the complaint

NJ: State failed to show exigency for warrantless phone records search

Under New Jersey statute and constitution, cell phone records and CSLI required a showing of probable cause and a court order since 2010. Exigent circumstances were a recognized exception, and the state failed to show exigency here. State v. Manning, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on NJ: State failed to show exigency for warrantless phone records search