Category Archives: Consent

CA5: Consent not overborne by appeal to emotion that consenter would be in trouble only if certain facts were true

Defendant was hiding in his grandmother’s house with a 13 year old runaway. Her free will to consent was not overborne by an appeal to her emotion that she’d be in trouble only if she knew the girl was in … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on CA5: Consent not overborne by appeal to emotion that consenter would be in trouble only if certain facts were true

E.D.Tenn.: Consent to search car extended the time of the stop for the drug dog

Defendant’s consent to search his rental car extended the length of the stop, so the use of a drug dog didn’t. United States v. Chin, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67388 (E.D. Tenn. May 16, 2014), R&R 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Consent to search car extended the time of the stop for the drug dog

OR: Bag outside apartment door couldn’t be considered abandoned without some inquiry

A warrantless search of a bag found a few feet from defendant’s apartment door was not objectively considered abandoned without some effort to find out the owner. Until the bag was objectively considered lost or abandoned, the officer could not … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Abandonment, Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OR: Bag outside apartment door couldn’t be considered abandoned without some inquiry

S.D.Ohio: PC was shown for SW for a pain clinic’s records

Probable cause was shown for the search warrant for defendant’s pain clinic and home for medical and financial records. And undercover officer got scripts without a proper examination. United States v. Callihan, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66580 (S.D. Ohio May … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: PC was shown for SW for a pain clinic’s records

MA: Broad computer search by consent isn’t later limited by SW

Defendant was arrested in an internet sting involving communication with purported minors. He consented to a search of his computer, but the police got a search warrant for back up.“That police took the additional precautionary step of obtaining a search … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Warrant execution | Comments Off on MA: Broad computer search by consent isn’t later limited by SW

AR: Alternative argument on timing of consent not ruled on below, so it’s defaulted

Consent was found against the defendant, and it’s affirmed on appeal because “the record is devoid of any evidence that appellant was coerced into consenting.” Her alternative argument that the consent was obtained after the search was already started was … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep | Comments Off on AR: Alternative argument on timing of consent not ruled on below, so it’s defaulted

ID: Defendant’s consent to enter to look for wanted felon cured alleged curtilage violation

Police came to defendant’s trailer on rural property looking for a wanted felon. He consented to an entry to look for the guy, and inside the officers smelled then saw raw marijuana and paraphernalia. Even if the entry onto the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Curtilage, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ID: Defendant’s consent to enter to look for wanted felon cured alleged curtilage violation

E.D.Wis.: If defendant doesn’t tell his lawyer something, the lawyer can’t be ineffective about it

Defendant contends that the search of his vehicle was without his consent, and defense counsel was ineffective for not raising that issue. The court finds as a fact that defendant never mentioned that to defense counsel, therefore, counsel couldn’t be … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: If defendant doesn’t tell his lawyer something, the lawyer can’t be ineffective about it

E.D.N.C.: If information omitted doesn’t undermine PC, no Franks violation

At worst, the officer’s omission of three things from the affidavit for search warrant was negligent, not reckless, and, even if the material was included, it doesn’t defeat the finding of probable cause. “Thus, because Mr. Simpson has failed to … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, E-mail, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: If information omitted doesn’t undermine PC, no Franks violation

MT: Counting pills in a prescription bottle is within a probation officer’s authority during a home visit

Counting pills in a prescription bottle is within a probation officer’s authority during a home visit. If the PO could search and take a UA, he could count pills. State v. Fischer, 2014 MT 112, 374 Mont. 533 (April 29, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on MT: Counting pills in a prescription bottle is within a probation officer’s authority during a home visit

CA4: Having no keys and breaking in through window belies apparent authority to consent

Officers came to plaintiff’s house with his former girlfriend who they contend consented to the entry. She, however, had no key to the house and they broke in through a window. Plaintiff stated a § 1983 claim because it wasn’t … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Apparent authority, Consent | Comments Off on CA4: Having no keys and breaking in through window belies apparent authority to consent

M.D.Pa.: Officers reasonably believed person named in warrant resided with defendant, so entry valid

The DUSM here credibly testified that the target of his arrest warrant actually resided at the place searched, notwithstanding that the testimony proved incorrect. The belief was reasonable, so defendant’s rights were not violated. United States v. Vasquez-Algarin, 2014 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Border search, Consent, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Officers reasonably believed person named in warrant resided with defendant, so entry valid

N.D.W.Va.: When response to request for consent is ambiguous, failure to object is grant of consent

Defendant’s response to a request for consent was ambiguous. Then his failure to object is inferred to be consent. United States v. Merritt, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57886 (N.D. W.Va. March 26, 2014), adopted 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57887 (N.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: When response to request for consent is ambiguous, failure to object is grant of consent

N.M.: When you know the jail calls are recorded, you consent merely by making a call.

When you know the jail calls are recorded, you consent merely by making a call. State v. Melendrez, 2014 N.M. App. LEXIS 40 (April 23, 2014). Defendant’s call from his child sex offense victim was properly recorded with the child’s … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.M.: When you know the jail calls are recorded, you consent merely by making a call.

WA: Comment on refusal to take BAC test didn’t violate constitutions

Assuming that a field sobriety test is a search, this was reasonable and based on reasonable suspicion. Comment on refusal to take a BAC test was not unconstitutional because there was no constitutional right not to take the test. State … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on WA: Comment on refusal to take BAC test didn’t violate constitutions

N.D.Ill.: Consent by person with apparent authority “trumped” defendant’s remote refusal

A woman answered the door at 10 am in a bathrobe, suggesting she lived there or at least spent the night. Further inquiry showed apparent authority. Her consent “trumped” defendant’s remote refusal. United States v. Terry, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Consent by person with apparent authority “trumped” defendant’s remote refusal

CA11: Stop of wrong car on a BOLO was still with RS, and the search was valid because only stop was argued

Officers received a robbery report at 12:30 am that multiple men in a 2011 white Charger had robbed a man at outside an apartment building. Within minutes and four miles away, they pulled in behind a white Charger which is … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: Stop of wrong car on a BOLO was still with RS, and the search was valid because only stop was argued

M.D.La.: Smell of marijuana on traffic stop justified its continuation

“Corporal Spelying’s continued detention of the defendant to ask him questions regarding his suspended license and his travel itinerary did not violate the Fourth Amendment” because he could smell marijuana immediately into the stop. United States v. Robertson, 2014 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Smell of marijuana on traffic stop justified its continuation

W.D.Mo.: Dog alert on an airplane PC for SW

Defendant was flying a small aircraft, and he diverted from the flight plan. Local police were alerted, and a dog sniff was made of the airplane. The police went to the hotel where defendant was staying to talk to him, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Dog alert on an airplane PC for SW

CA10 explains the presumption of apparent authority for consent with parents and adult children living at home

Defendant was convicted of murder. The body was found, and it was obviously dumped. The FBI learned that the victim had been seen last with the defendant in the car at a casino and defendant had a gun consistent with … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Tagged , | Comments Off on CA10 explains the presumption of apparent authority for consent with parents and adult children living at home