CA5: Consent not overborne by appeal to emotion that consenter would be in trouble only if certain facts were true

Defendant was hiding in his grandmother’s house with a 13 year old runaway. Her free will to consent was not overborne by an appeal to her emotion that she’d be in trouble only if she knew the girl was in the house, because that was true. United States v. Anderson, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 9359 (5th Cir. May 20, 2014):

Warrantless searches are not considered per se unreasonable when the search is conducted pursuant to consent. Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 219, 93 S. Ct. 2041, 36 L. Ed. 2d 854 (1973). Whether the consent was voluntary is a question of fact to be determined by the totality of the circumstances. Id. at 227. Defendant challenges the voluntariness of Anderson’s consent, arguing that the police procedures were coercive because May threatened to arrest Anderson if she refused consent. However, the district court found that May told Anderson she would be arrested only if she knew Doe was in her house; the district court also explicitly rejected Anderson’s testimony that May threatened to arrest her regardless of her knowledge. There was no clear error in the district court’s determination since it was a plausible credibility determination in light of the evidence. See Jacquinot, 258 F.3d at 427. Furthermore, the evidence supports the district court’s determination that Anderson’s will was not overborne by May’s statement that she could be arrested if she was knowingly concealing Doe because Anderson continued to refuse consent until May appealed to her emotions. Because there is no clear error, we affirm the district court’s finding that Anderson’s consent was voluntary. See id.

This entry was posted in Consent. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.