Category Archives: Consent

AR: Officer’s personal knowledge def’s DL suspended is reasonable suspicion

The officer knew defendant and knew that defendant’s DL was suspended. That was reasonable suspicion for a stop. Medlock v. State, 2016 Ark. App. 282, 2016 Ark. App. LEXIS 303 (May 25, 2016).* Summarily affirmed based on recent precedent: “State … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AR: Officer’s personal knowledge def’s DL suspended is reasonable suspicion

OH10: Plain view during consent search supported SW when consent withdrawn

Officers responding to a shots fired call asked defendant about a gun in his house. He denied there was one and consented to a search of the first floor. In the bathroom, officers saw crack cocaine in plain view. They … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH10: Plain view during consent search supported SW when consent withdrawn

OR: Two on scope of consent, one suppressing drug paraphernalia found during a courthouse security check

Defendant put her purse through the x-ray at the security checkpoint into a juvenile court facility. There were signs warning about searches for weapons. The security officer opened her purse and found a spoon as drug paraphernalia. The consent was … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on OR: Two on scope of consent, one suppressing drug paraphernalia found during a courthouse security check

CA8: Consent to fully search a home includes forensically searching computers found there

Consent to fully search defendant’s home by PO’s after a computer was found in violation of the terms of his release is consent to forensically analyze the product of the search, here a computer hard drive. United States v. Berger, … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Consent | Comments Off on CA8: Consent to fully search a home includes forensically searching computers found there

D.Neb.: Consent also shown by def’s action of opening bag when requested

Defendant consented to a search of his bag by one officer when others were present. Consent was also by implication by opening it when requested. United States v. Garcia, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66061 (D.Neb. May 19, 2016). Officers had … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Consent also shown by def’s action of opening bag when requested

NC: Def’s bizarre travel plans, nervousness, masking odors, and smell of MJ was RS even to the uninitiated

Based on defendant’s bizarre travel plans, his nervousness, the use of masking odors, the smell of marijuana on him, and the third-party registration of the vehicle, even an untrained person would doubt defendant’s story. Thus, the officer, a 15-year veteran … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NC: Def’s bizarre travel plans, nervousness, masking odors, and smell of MJ was RS even to the uninitiated

CA5: Tax appraiser worked by consent; qualified immunity on scope of search claim

Plaintiff consented to entry onto his property by a tax appraiser, and his dispute was whether the appraiser exceeded the scope of the consent. The district court denied summary judgment for the appraiser, but the Fifth Circuit finds such a … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Tax appraiser worked by consent; qualified immunity on scope of search claim

CA7: Officer’s use of translation app on iPhone to ask for consent in Spanish was close enough for consent

Defendant disputed the officer’s attempt at asking for consent in Spanish using a translation app on his iPhone. The defense called expert Spanish speakers that the query was essentially “may I look [at or for] your car” not in it. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on CA7: Officer’s use of translation app on iPhone to ask for consent in Spanish was close enough for consent

S.D.Fla.: No standing in a rental car obtained with a fake ID and CC and then turned over to another

Defendant had no standing in this rental car rented in a false name with a fake ID and credit card and then he drove the car away and then turned the car over to a co-conspirator who was driving at … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: No standing in a rental car obtained with a fake ID and CC and then turned over to another

CA8: POs had RS to seize and search a flash drive from def’s residence during a probation search caused by a tip

Probation officers had reasonable suspicion to seize a flash drive found during a supervised-release search of defendant’s residence. Reasonable suspicion existed because of defendant’s prior conviction for possession of child pornography, a release condition prohibiting him from accessing a computer, … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Consent, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: POs had RS to seize and search a flash drive from def’s residence during a probation search caused by a tip

AL: Controlled buys were PC for car search

A search warrant was issued for defendant’s home, and he was also involved in three controlled buys from his car. His stop miles from the search of his house was based on the probable cause from the buys, not the … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AL: Controlled buys were PC for car search

CA3: A prostitute has apparent authority to consent to entry into a hotel room rented by her pimp

A prostitute working in a motel room for a pimp has apparent authority to consent to an entry. When a man entered the room with a key, he could be patted down. United States v. Murray, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent | Comments Off on CA3: A prostitute has apparent authority to consent to entry into a hotel room rented by her pimp

N.D.Ga.: Consent still voluntary despite argument it’s not logical that somebody holding would consent; argument def believed nothing would be found supports voluntariness

That it can be argued it isn’t logical that somebody with drugs would consent, they still do, and it still doesn’t mean that he didn’t consent voluntarily. United States v. Collins, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54816 (N.D.Ga. Feb. 9, 2016), … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Consent still voluntary despite argument it’s not logical that somebody holding would consent; argument def believed nothing would be found supports voluntariness

CA5: DEA subpoena preempts Texas Occupational Code on patient privacy

The DEA subpoena power of the federal Controlled Substances Act subpoena preempts the Texas Occupational Code, so the doctor here can’t rely on state law to prevent disclosure of patient medical records. The gag order request in the subpoena was … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on CA5: DEA subpoena preempts Texas Occupational Code on patient privacy

D.Nev.: Consent on Amtrak platform wasn’t voluntary

Defendant was button-holed during a smoke break off the train when his Amtrak train stopped in Reno. His consent for a search of this compartment and stuff wasn’t consensual and induced by the threat of a dog sniff; it was … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Consent on Amtrak platform wasn’t voluntary

N.D.Cal.: When officer asks if there’s anything illegal in car and def consents, consent includes the trunk

Defendant’s consent was found voluntary on the totality, and defendant had to understand that the scope of consent included the trunk. “First, with respect to the object of the search, the evidence shows that Officer Williams asked defendant if he … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: When officer asks if there’s anything illegal in car and def consents, consent includes the trunk

D.Neb.: Cut and paste error where address went into “things to be seized” wasn’t fatal where things were apparent from warrant application as a whole

An apparent cut and paste error led to the officer pasting the place to be searched into the things to be seized section of the warrant looking for clothing from a robbery. The affidavit included pages of photographs of the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Scope of search, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Cut and paste error where address went into “things to be seized” wasn’t fatal where things were apparent from warrant application as a whole

CA11: Where the SW was drafted the day before the alleged illegal entry, the independent source doctrine clearly applied

The independent source doctrine was sufficient to show that the search was valid, no matter what. The affidavit for the search warrant was drafted the day before the alleged illegal entry for arrest and protective sweep, which the court can … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Independent source | Comments Off on CA11: Where the SW was drafted the day before the alleged illegal entry, the independent source doctrine clearly applied

TN: Not deficient performance for IAC where Fourth Amendment argument hadn’t yet been recognized

It was not deficient performance on the part of trial counsel to fail to argue that text messages should have been suppressed, a legal theory which, at the time, lacked statutory or precedential support. Vaughn v. State, 2016 Tenn. Crim. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Curtilage, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on TN: Not deficient performance for IAC where Fourth Amendment argument hadn’t yet been recognized

OH10: Def can’t suppress his assault on officer by claiming entry was illegal

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not challenging under the Fourth Amendment the police entry into the house that led to defendant assaulting an officer. Even if it was a nonconsensual entry, defendant’s crime against the officer was independent of … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Consent, Independent source | Comments Off on OH10: Def can’t suppress his assault on officer by claiming entry was illegal