Category Archives: Franks doctrine

D.Neb.: Def motion for SW materials denied for time being; ongoing investigation

Where there is a First and Fourth Amendment and common law right to discovery of search warrant materials, Supplemental Rule G also provides for it for forfeiture. Here, however, the government shows in camera that disclosure now would jeopardize an … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Def motion for SW materials denied for time being; ongoing investigation

CA6: Def’s IAC argument that suppression argument could have been better made fails because it wouldn’t prevail in any event

“Maurice Carter pled guilty to a variety of sex crimes and received a twenty-year prison sentence. He now petitions for habeas relief. Carter alleges his attorneys were constitutionally ineffective for failing to make the best arguments for suppression of key … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA6: Def’s IAC argument that suppression argument could have been better made fails because it wouldn’t prevail in any event

KS: Even with roadside Miranda violation, PC still exists under the 4A without the statement

Defendant’s statement at the side of the road was taken in violation of Miranda and should have been suppressed. This does not affect, however, the Fourth Amendment analysis of whether there was probable cause because there was without the statement. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on KS: Even with roadside Miranda violation, PC still exists under the 4A without the statement

D.Minn.: Def succeeds in his Franks offer of proof; PC doubtful

Defendant succeeds in his Franks offer of proof. The omitted information undermines probable cause, and a hearing will be held. United States v. Reed, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206986 (D. Minn. Dec. 7, 2018):

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Def succeeds in his Franks offer of proof; PC doubtful

DE: No REP in shared Facebook photos

“Moreover, Harris’ contention that his public Facebook photos were ‘illegally seized’ has no merit.” There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in a shared social media post. Harris v. State, 2018 Del. LEXIS 540 (Dec. 3, 2018). Defendant argued that … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on DE: No REP in shared Facebook photos

LA: False statement in affidavit passed from another officer was harmless on PC question

The statement the officer used in the affidavit came from another officer. At worst it was negligent and not an intentional misrepresentation. No matter what, however, it doesn’t undermine the probable cause, so the motion was properly denied. State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on LA: False statement in affidavit passed from another officer was harmless on PC question

W.D.Mo.: Boilerplate Franks claim fails on its face

“The defendant’s boilerplate claim that the ‘information used to obtain the search warrant from the Circuit Court judge was flawed with false allegation….’, … does not meet the Franks test for a hearing.” “While defendant did not explicitly argue that … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Boilerplate Franks claim fails on its face

FL4: SW papers are public records, and due process requires def to see them

Search warrant papers are discoverable to the defense and the unredacted parts are public records that must be disclosed. “The state asks us to prevent the disclosure of information that it had redacted from search warrants and warrant applications related … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Warrant execution, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on FL4: SW papers are public records, and due process requires def to see them

DE: Lack of temporal limitation in data search only results in suppression of the excess, not all

The search warrant for information was based on probable cause, but it lacked a temporal limitation. That, however, doesn’t lead to suppression of the whole; just suppression of that which was obtained that predates the probable cause. State v. Anderson, … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Particularity | Comments Off on DE: Lack of temporal limitation in data search only results in suppression of the excess, not all

CA9: Question about telephone number before Miranda warning wasn’t protected by warning

Question about defendant’s telephone number prior to his Miranda warning wasn’t covered by Miranda. The phone number linked defendant to a dropbox account with child pornography. United States v. Chilaca, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 33136 (9th Cir. Nov. 26, 2018). … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Privileges | Comments Off on CA9: Question about telephone number before Miranda warning wasn’t protected by warning

MA: “Freezing” house for alleged prostitution for alleged exigency was unreasonable

Police “froze” a house and searched the second floor for evidence of alleged prostitution; couldn’t be justified on this record. What physical evidence would there be? Commonwealth v. Owens, 480 Mass. 1034 (Nov. 7, 2018). There was a mistake in … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on MA: “Freezing” house for alleged prostitution for alleged exigency was unreasonable

N.D.Ga.: Car not abandoned by fleeing def because a co-def stayed with it

A car is not abandoned by the defendant merely because, when he fled, a confederate stayed behind. United States v. Gibbs, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187572 (N.D. Ga. Nov. 2, 2018). The audio recording of the police-citizen interaction has enough, … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Car not abandoned by fleeing def because a co-def stayed with it

D.Md.: Omitted information that supported PC belies the officer was attempting to mislead as to a mistake in the affidavit

The failure to include the date of uploading of child pornography images wasn’t known to the officer at the time the search warrant was obtained, so the officer did not mislead the magistrate issuing the warrant. The misstatement of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Md.: Omitted information that supported PC belies the officer was attempting to mislead as to a mistake in the affidavit

D.Kan.: After a Franks hearing, PC exists despite omitted information

Defendant was under investigation for threatening to use a weapon of mass destruction. After the search, police found child pornography, too. He filed a Franks motion about omitted information and got a hearing. The court finds probable cause and no … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Kan.: After a Franks hearing, PC exists despite omitted information

CA11: Affiant’s not putting what he thought from CI was false didn’t violate Franks

The officer declined to put the CI’s inconsistent statements in that he thought were false. This didn’t violate Franks, and there was probable cause anyway. United States v. King, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 30122 (11th Cir. Oct. 25, 2018):

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA11: Affiant’s not putting what he thought from CI was false didn’t violate Franks

TX14: Two prior searches for blood constitutionally or statutorily didn’t need to be mentioned in affidavit for third

Defendant was in a car wreck that killed another at 1 am, New Years Day 2014. There were three blood draws: one for medical purposes at the hospital, one directed by the police at the hospital, and one after a … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on TX14: Two prior searches for blood constitutionally or statutorily didn’t need to be mentioned in affidavit for third

MA: Justification for no-knock shown by risk of destruction of evidence because def’s apartment on 3d floor with locked outside door

A no-knock entry to prevent destruction of evidence was justified by the fact defendant’s apartment was on the third floor and police had to navigate a locked first floor door before they got to his apartment. Commonwealth v. Silva, 2018 … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Knock and announce | Comments Off on MA: Justification for no-knock shown by risk of destruction of evidence because def’s apartment on 3d floor with locked outside door

N.D.Ind.: Franks requires attaching affidavit to the motion to suppress

Defendant’s Franks request for an evidentiary hearing without attaching the affidavit for the search warrant is denied without prejudice. The court has nothing to compare. United States v. Carswell, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165132 (N.D. Ind. Sep. 26, 2018). The … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Franks requires attaching affidavit to the motion to suppress

CA9: Police supervisor’s alleged after-the-fact acquiescence in an alleged illegal search isn’t a § 1983 claim

A police supervisor’s post-hoc alleged acquiescence that he didn’t participate in an alleged illegal search doesn’t state a claim against the supervisor. Hunt v. Davis, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 26265 (9th Cir. Sep. 17, 2018). The officers corroborated enough of … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Police supervisor’s alleged after-the-fact acquiescence in an alleged illegal search isn’t a § 1983 claim

OH9: Probable hand-to-hand drug deal from car was RS for stop

Potential hand-to-hand drug deal in a car was reasonable suspicion for a stop. It’s what these officers were always looking for. [It may have ultimately had an innocent explanation, but it looked like it to them.] State v. Dunlap, 2018-Ohio-3658, … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH9: Probable hand-to-hand drug deal from car was RS for stop