CA9: Question about telephone number before Miranda warning wasn’t protected by warning

Question about defendant’s telephone number prior to his Miranda warning wasn’t covered by Miranda. The phone number linked defendant to a dropbox account with child pornography. United States v. Chilaca, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 33136 (9th Cir. Nov. 26, 2018).

“The defendant’s statements that [the officer] ‘mitted’ or ‘concealed’ the informant’s background, without more, are just unsupported allegations.” R&R adopted. United States v. Lewis, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 199469 (E.D. Wis. Nov. 26, 2018).*

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Privileges. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.