Category Archives: Standards of review

MN clarifies the appellate standard of review of RS and PC; here there was RS for continued detention for dog sniff

There is no deference to the trial court’s findings of probable cause and reasonable suspicion. They are ultimate questions which can be appealed. Here, the officers had reasonable suspicion to continue defendant’s detention for a dog sniff. State v. Lugo, … Continue reading

Posted in Standards of review | Comments Off on MN clarifies the appellate standard of review of RS and PC; here there was RS for continued detention for dog sniff

CA11: Arguable probable cause entitles the officer to qualified immunity

Arguable probable cause entitles the officer to qualified immunity, here for a mental health seizure. May v. City of Nahunta, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 20501 (11th Cir. Nov. 15, 2016), same result on rehearing, May v. City of Nahunta, 2017 … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA11: Arguable probable cause entitles the officer to qualified immunity

OH11: Trial court’s finding of no RS to delay the stop was clearly erroneous

The trial court’s finding that the officer delayed the stop without reasonable suspicion is clearly erroneous because the record does not support the finding. State v. Taylor, 2016-Ohio-7745, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 4613 (11th Dist. Nov. 14, 2016):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on OH11: Trial court’s finding of no RS to delay the stop was clearly erroneous

MA: PC showing was close, but, essentially, ties go in support of the warrant

The trial court held that the affidavit for the search warrant did not show probable cause under Aguilar-Spinelli (still followed in Massachusetts), but the court of appeals disagrees and reverses. There were direct police observations that corroborated the informant’s story. … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Standards of review | Comments Off on MA: PC showing was close, but, essentially, ties go in support of the warrant

GA: When evidence at suppression hearing is uncontroverted, whole suppression issue is reviewed de novo

“When the evidence at a suppression hearing is uncontroverted and the credibility of witnesses is not in question, we conduct a de novo review of the trial court’s application of the law to the undisputed facts.” The state did not … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on GA: When evidence at suppression hearing is uncontroverted, whole suppression issue is reviewed de novo

KS: While entry into house to arrest for DUI was likely unreasonable, it was harmless error on this record; plenty of evidence without it

The court of appeals found the entry into defendant’s home to arrest him for DUI was unreasonable and without sufficient exigency, but, on the totality, it was not prejudicial error. There was plenty of evidence defendant was driving drunk without … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on KS: While entry into house to arrest for DUI was likely unreasonable, it was harmless error on this record; plenty of evidence without it

D.C.Cir.: Govt waived standing by not presenting issue to Dist.Ct.

The government waived defendant’s lack of standing by not arguing it in the district court. The faint smell of marijuana and multiple air fresheners was probable cause to search. United States v. Sheffield, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14826 (D.C.Cir. Aug. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of proof, Qualified immunity, Standards of review, Standing | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: Govt waived standing by not presenting issue to Dist.Ct.

TX14: Text messages between def and murder victim and possession of victim’s phone was PC for cell phone SW

Text messages between a murder victim and the defendant just before the murder supported probable cause to search defendant’s cell phone. Defendant was found with the victim’s car and cell phone after the murder. Walker v. State, 2016 Tex. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Standards of review | Comments Off on TX14: Text messages between def and murder victim and possession of victim’s phone was PC for cell phone SW

NH: Officers who parked in def’s driveway could lawfully smell marijuana coming from his garage

Officers got out of their cars in defendant’s driveway and could smell marijuana coming from defendant’s garage. They didn’t unreasonably invade the curtilage. State v. Socci, 2015 N.H. LEXIS 259 (Dec. 4, 2015),* prior appeal State v. Socci, 166 N.H. … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Standards of review | Comments Off on NH: Officers who parked in def’s driveway could lawfully smell marijuana coming from his garage

ID: Def was entitled to retrieve duffle bag in rental car before inventory

Defendant had standing to challenge the search of his duffle bag in a rental car. The State conceded that the officers’ conduct in refusing to allow him to take the luggage from a rental car and notifying him that the … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Inventory, Standards of review | Comments Off on ID: Def was entitled to retrieve duffle bag in rental car before inventory

GA: Unconscious defendant doesn’t get the implied consent notice

Unconscious defendant doesn’t get the implied consent notice. Bailey v. State, 2016 Ga. App. LEXIS 433 (July 13, 2016).* The officer here had reasonable suspicion to stop defendant’s car after it left a motel with a man and woman inside, … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on GA: Unconscious defendant doesn’t get the implied consent notice

N.D.Cal.: Decision of a USMJ to issue a search warrant is reviewed by the District Court for “clear error”

The decision of a USMJ to issue a search warrant is reviewed by the District Court for “clear error” in the Ninth Circuit. United States v. Alvarez, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75970 (N.D.Cal. June 10, 2016):

Posted in Burden of proof, Standards of review | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Decision of a USMJ to issue a search warrant is reviewed by the District Court for “clear error”

TX1: Frequenting bar known for drug sales, going in and out repeatedly, and furtive gestures when stopped was PC

Officers had probable cause under the automobile exception to search defendant’s truck, or at least the trial court had a basis for finding it. Defendant had entered a bar known for drug sales that the police were surveilling. He’d been … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Standards of review | Comments Off on TX1: Frequenting bar known for drug sales, going in and out repeatedly, and furtive gestures when stopped was PC

SCOTUS: Strickland’s deference to counsel’s decisions applies to appellate counsel [didn’t we all assume that anyway? Not CA6]

The Strickland “doubly deferential” standard of trial counsel’s failure to challenge a search issue because it would not prevail applies to appellate counsel, too. Woods v. Etherton, 15-723 (U.S. April 4, 2016):

Posted in Ineffective assistance, SCOTUS, Standards of review | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Strickland’s deference to counsel’s decisions applies to appellate counsel [didn’t we all assume that anyway? Not CA6]

OH4: Finding FTA warrant on MJ charge supported calling for drug dog

Defendant was stopped for a lane change violation, and an FTA warrant appeared on a possession of marijuana charge. The officer thus could call in a drug dog because of the already lawful reason to lengthen the detention. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Standards of review | Comments Off on OH4: Finding FTA warrant on MJ charge supported calling for drug dog

CA5: Search issue reserved in conditional plea is a limitation, and issues not specified are abandoned

Defendant’s conditional plea reserved “the issue of the validity of the search warrant,” and it limits the appeal. Thus, issues of consent and probable cause are outside the issues reserved in the conditional plea and thus abandoned. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Standards of review | Comments Off on CA5: Search issue reserved in conditional plea is a limitation, and issues not specified are abandoned

SC: CoA missapplied std of review by reweighing facts; warns that “nervousness” isn’t a blank check

The court of appeals misapplied the standard of review by reweighing the facts. The court can’t help, however, in talking about nervousness as an “omnipresent” factor in reasonable suspicion. State v. Moore, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 5 (Jan. 27, 2016), rev’g … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on SC: CoA missapplied std of review by reweighing facts; warns that “nervousness” isn’t a blank check