Category Archives: Inevitable discovery

D.Minn.: If warrant lacked PC or was defective, def’s admissions in questioning would have led to another search warrant based on more, so inevitable discovery applies

Police doing a child porn investigation with an allegedly defective search warrant come to defendant to talk about it, and his admissions are enough that the police would have obtained a search warrant if they already didn’t have one. Therefore, … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inevitable discovery, Inventory | Comments Off on D.Minn.: If warrant lacked PC or was defective, def’s admissions in questioning would have led to another search warrant based on more, so inevitable discovery applies

TN: CI’s reliability mooted by trash pull

Whether the CI was reliable was essentially moot based on a trash pull that showed all kinds of marijuana cuttings. State v. Altman, 2015 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 556 (July 13, 2015).* [Usually, the courts say that the CI was … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Independent source, Inevitable discovery, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on TN: CI’s reliability mooted by trash pull

CA10: Where no emergency suggested, welfare check entry violated Fourth Amendment

The officer here came to serve a summons at plaintiff’s house, and he looked through the window and saw the place was in disarray. He went to the door, and it was unlocked. He never knocked. He decided to perform … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Emergency / exigency, Inevitable discovery, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Where no emergency suggested, welfare check entry violated Fourth Amendment

DE: Inevitable discovery saves a search that started before the warrant was actually signed

Although the search in this case started before the search warrant was actually issued, the court applies the inevitable discovery exception to sustain it. The house was secured by the police waiting for the warrant to arrive, the application for … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on DE: Inevitable discovery saves a search that started before the warrant was actually signed

FL2: State “protective custody” doesn’t permit search incident; entry into jail here, however, made it valid

When defendant was taken into “protective custody” under state law as drug impaired, his backpack couldn’t be searched incident to arrest because it’s not an arrest. However, he ended up at the jail, and an inventory at the jail was … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on FL2: State “protective custody” doesn’t permit search incident; entry into jail here, however, made it valid

MN: Exigency for entry unproved; inevitable discovery doesn’t apply to statements after an unlawful search

The state didn’t make its burden in proving that the emergency aid exception applied to the entry into defendant’s home because there was no positive link to it and an assault where the victim was in the hospital being treated … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on MN: Exigency for entry unproved; inevitable discovery doesn’t apply to statements after an unlawful search

D.Kan.: PC alone doesn’t get the police to inevitable discovery: “To accept probable cause alone is to probably cause the (inevitable discovery) exception to swallow the (warrant requirement) rule.”

“Whatever view one has of the Fourth Amendment, its exceptional graces surely must be preserved from too casual invocation.” Here, the officers had probable cause, but no arrest or search warrant, when they entered a motel room looking for defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on D.Kan.: PC alone doesn’t get the police to inevitable discovery: “To accept probable cause alone is to probably cause the (inevitable discovery) exception to swallow the (warrant requirement) rule.”

GA: Mistaken belief def was on probation made search invalid; no GFE in GA, either; suppressed

The officer mistakenly believed that defendant was still on probation, but he wasn’t. The probation search was unlawful, and the good faith exception doesn’t apply in Georgia. State v. New, 2015 Ga. App. LEXIS 115 (March 12, 2015). The officer … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Search incident | Comments Off on GA: Mistaken belief def was on probation made search invalid; no GFE in GA, either; suppressed

TN: Dead body here subject to inevitable discovery

Just because the rent on an apartment hadn’t been paid and there had been no eviction process, his property was there and he was hiding after a murder, he did not abandon the home. The affidavit for search warrant was … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on TN: Dead body here subject to inevitable discovery

CA11: Illegal vehicle search cured by inevitable inventory; owner of car was dead

Defendant was driving on a suspended license the truck of a man known to be dead. The search of the truck was clearly illegal, but inevitable discovery applied because it would have been impounded and inventoried. United States v. Johnson, … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA11: Illegal vehicle search cured by inevitable inventory; owner of car was dead

MS: Throwing down car keys and running away from a car is abandonment

Throwing down car keys and running away from a car is abandonment. Green v. State, 2015 Miss. App. LEXIS 29 (January 20, 2015). In executing a search warrant for stolen goods on the premises of a convicted felon, the finding … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Inevitable discovery, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MS: Throwing down car keys and running away from a car is abandonment

UT: Attenuation doctrine must ultimately bottom on inevitable discovery

Under the attenuation doctrine, incorporating a proximate cause analysis, inevitable discovery must ultimately control where there is both lawful and unlawful police action. State v. Strieff, 2015 UT 2, 2015 Utah LEXIS 4 (January 16, 2015):

Posted in Attenuation, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on UT: Attenuation doctrine must ultimately bottom on inevitable discovery

NC: Excessive force as an unreasonable search has to be raised in trial court first

During a traffic stop, reasonable suspicion was clearly developing, and defendant had something in his hand while denying it. Multiple requests to open his hand were refused, and, fearing a weapon, the officer ultimately had to take defendant down to … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Exclusionary rule, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on NC: Excessive force as an unreasonable search has to be raised in trial court first

CA2: Court lacks “high level of confidence” for inevitable discovery to apply

Here, the search discovering defendant’s illegal firearms violated the Fourth Amendment, but the government argued for inevitable discovery, but the court lacks a “high level of confidence” that the officers would have inevitably discovered it. The government’s argument was essentially … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Inevitable discovery, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA2: Court lacks “high level of confidence” for inevitable discovery to apply