Category Archives: Particularity

Three Aaron Hernandez cell phone and house search cases on Lexis today; cell phone turned over to lawyers not immune from search (Updated)

Commonwealth v. Hernandez, 2014 Mass. Super. LEXIS 144 (Super. Ct. Bristol August 26, 2014) (“Because the Commonwealth failed to sustain its burden of proof that the cell phones and iPads were in plain view, that their incriminating character was immediately … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on Three Aaron Hernandez cell phone and house search cases on Lexis today; cell phone turned over to lawyers not immune from search (Updated)

D.N.M.: Flexibility permitted in computer file searches because of ease of hiding things

A computer search warrant isn’t overbroad because it doesn’t specify the files to be searched with complete particularity. It isn’t feasible or reasonable to require it because file names and dates can be changed to hide things. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Flexibility permitted in computer file searches because of ease of hiding things

D.S.D.: Community caretaking entry must be objectively reasonable and still be wrong

Officers’ legitimate concerns that a person inside a house was in danger or restrained, although wrong, were reasonable, and that authorized an entry under the community caretaking function. The fact they were wrong doesn’t matter if their belief was reasonable. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Community caretaking function, Computer and cloud searches, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Community caretaking entry must be objectively reasonable and still be wrong

CA3: Failure to include attachment when SW served didn’t make it overbroad

The failure to serve an attachment with the search warrant is not fatal despite it providing particularity. It was presented to the USMJ, and the officer’s conduct was otherwise objectively reasonable. The question of good faith does not even have … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity | Comments Off on CA3: Failure to include attachment when SW served didn’t make it overbroad

Boston Marathon bombing case: D.Mass.: SW was broad, but not constitutionally overbroad

In the Boston Marathon bombing case, the search warrant for defendant’s house and college dormitory room were necessarily broad but not constitutionally overbroad. It wasn’t even possible for a search warrant to be more specifically drafted than this one was, … Continue reading →

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on Boston Marathon bombing case: D.Mass.: SW was broad, but not constitutionally overbroad

N.D.Okla.: Police unlawful entry onto the curtilage didn’t void consent to search phone or house

Police officers entered the curtilage going to defendant’s side yard. They did not, however, unconstitutionally cause his abandonment of the package of drugs that he was expecting by his denials that he was receiving any package. Defendant also was talked … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Consent, Particularity | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: Police unlawful entry onto the curtilage didn’t void consent to search phone or house

TX3: Private election actions don’t lead to unreasonable searches: it’s private action and court can intercede

Texas provides for a private right of action in some election matters. The statutes are not facially unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment or Fourteenth Amendment due process in potential civil discovery disputes because these are private parties asking, and the … Continue reading →

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity, Private search | Comments Off on TX3: Private election actions don’t lead to unreasonable searches: it’s private action and court can intercede

Cal: Indicia warrant was proper

The search warrant seeking personal property on the premises that would identify defendant as having control over the property was not overbroad. It was necessary for the prosecution to establish defendant’s connection to the property. People v. Bryant, 2014 Cal. … Continue reading →

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on Cal: Indicia warrant was proper

NM: No PC for SW in VIN switching scheme; not enough shown

Because of 1983’s Gates, it’s a rare case that doesn’t find probable cause, or at least good faith reliance on the finding of PC via Leon. Here’s one from New Mexico on a VIN switching scheme where the search warrant … Continue reading →

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on NM: No PC for SW in VIN switching scheme; not enough shown

Two large records searches, not overbroad when read with the attachments

Defendant was lawyer involved in a fraud, and the court of appeals finds that his office was “permeated with fraud” such that a broad records search was permitted. Attachment A to the warrant limited discretion, and he contended it was … Continue reading →

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on Two large records searches, not overbroad when read with the attachments

D.Del.: Passenger lacked standing to contest placement of GPS, aside from the fact it was before Jones

Defendant as a passenger lacked standing in the GPS placement on another’s vehicle before Jones, never even having to discuss Davis good faith. United States v. Cabrera, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96288 (D. Del. July 16, 2014).* Defendant’s overbreadth challenge … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Ineffective assistance, Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on D.Del.: Passenger lacked standing to contest placement of GPS, aside from the fact it was before Jones

D.Kan.: Standard govt cell phone search protocol violates particularity requirement and results in a general search

And it begins: What is the scope of Riley? When I was interviewed by the NYT last week about Riley, I mentioned that particularity was going to be the next real issue in cell phone searches, but that didn’t end … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Standard govt cell phone search protocol violates particularity requirement and results in a general search

OR: Ordering defendant out of his house for an FST was a “stop” and detention as a show of authority

Ordering defendant out of his house for a FST was a “stop” and detention under the state constitution because it was a show of authority. State v. Charles, 263 Or. App. ___, 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 804 (June 18, 2014). … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Motion to suppress, Particularity, State constitution, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OR: Ordering defendant out of his house for an FST was a “stop” and detention as a show of authority

CA11: Inference of firearms nearly always with drugs less likely in small scale operations

While firearms are implicitly involved in drug transactions, the smaller the dealer, the less likely the inference. The search warrant here didn’t specify firearms, and, in drug distribution cases, it’s usually likely a gun will be found. Here, officers thought … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Plain view, feel, smell, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA11: Inference of firearms nearly always with drugs less likely in small scale operations