Category Archives: Probation / Parole search

IL: Arrest of driver would not make passengers think they were free to leave; continuation of stop was with RS

Passengers would not think they were free to leave based on the arrest and handcuffing of defendant driver. The continuation of the stop, however, was with reasonable suspicion because of furtive movements. People v. Veal, 2017 IL App (1st) 150500, … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on IL: Arrest of driver would not make passengers think they were free to leave; continuation of stop was with RS

Cal.4th: Probation search for “property” does not include “electronic data”

The juvenile’s probation search condition for his “property” does not reasonably include electronic data. In re I.V., 2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 392 (4th Dist. April 28, 2017):

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Cal.4th: Probation search for “property” does not include “electronic data”

D.Mont.: Possession of a camera phone was violation of release conditions and justified PO search

Defendant had a release condition to stay away from children, but he babysat two and he let them use his cell phone connected to his computer. This was reasonable suspicion for a search of the cell phone and computer for … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Possession of a camera phone was violation of release conditions and justified PO search

CO: Parolee on ankle monitor had no REP in his GPS data that linked him to robberies and was turned over to feds

Defendant was on parole-like Colorado community supervision with a GPS ankle monitor. One of the POs, not his, was cross-assigned to a federal task force. When defendant was suspected of being involved in robberies, the federally assigned PO looked up … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CO: Parolee on ankle monitor had no REP in his GPS data that linked him to robberies and was turned over to feds

D.P.R.: Just being a driver of vehicle doesn’t give standing; two traffic tickets in past in vehicle not enough

Defendant at the suppression hearing showed no possessory interest in the vehicle he claimed not to own at the time of the stop and search. Two traffic tickets in the past driving the same vehicle wasn’t enough. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Just being a driver of vehicle doesn’t give standing; two traffic tickets in past in vehicle not enough

VA: PC for stop for reckless driving didn’t get stale in 3 hours

The officer saw defendant recklessly driving, but wasn’t able to stop him. Staleness for arrest for that did not dissipate within three hours before he saw defendant again. Hairston v. Commonwealth, 2017 Va. App. LEXIS 99 (April 11, 2017) (see … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probation / Parole search, Staleness | Comments Off on VA: PC for stop for reckless driving didn’t get stale in 3 hours

E.D.N.C.: Def’s probation search was done at a reasonable time and in a reasonable manner, as required by state statute

Defendant’s North Carolina probation search was conducted at a reasonable time and in a reasonable manner, as required by statute, and it was for probation purposes. It was not quite a nighttime search. United States v. Lynch, 2017 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Def’s probation search was done at a reasonable time and in a reasonable manner, as required by state statute

FL: Def abandoned gun by storing it in attic of friend’s house where friend said gun wasn’t allowed in house

Defendant abandoned his gun by putting it in his friend’s attic in a shoebox after he was told the gun was not welcome in the house. Heyne v. State, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 748 (April 6, 2017). The PO had reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on FL: Def abandoned gun by storing it in attic of friend’s house where friend said gun wasn’t allowed in house

D.S.D.: CI tip provided RS for probation home search

The PO’s CI provided information which came to the PO through the police. There was no independent verification of the CI’s tale, but there was enough detail to provide reasonable suspicion for a home search under the conditions of the … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.S.D.: CI tip provided RS for probation home search

TN: Scope of probation search can be limited by the terms of the search condition

The probation search here lacked reasonable suspicion because the CI wasn’t adequately corroborated to amount to reasonable suspicion. Also, the probation search here was limited to the areas in the house controlled by the defendant’s under the search condition imposed … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Scope of search | Comments Off on TN: Scope of probation search can be limited by the terms of the search condition

CA11: RS justified home search by PO when door opened and MJ could be smelled, plus more, not that it mattered

POs came to defendant’s place for a home visit. When the door was opened, the officer could smell marijuana. He asked for defendant and the man answering the door said defendant didn’t live there. He asked for defendant’s girlfriend who … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA11: RS justified home search by PO when door opened and MJ could be smelled, plus more, not that it mattered

W.D.Ky.: Even if there wasn’t PC for a home search, there was RS for a parole search

Even if the officer’s showing was insufficient to show probable cause, the officer could rely on defendant’s parole search waiver for the search because the information clearly provided at least reasonable suspicion. United States v. Ickes, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Even if there wasn’t PC for a home search, there was RS for a parole search

LA4: Probation search unreasonable because PO not there; clearly pretext for criminal search

The collection of officers from several law enforcement agencies for a probation “compliance check” shows that it wasn’t a bona fide probation search. “Given the totality of the circumstances, the compliance check was unreasonably pretextual. Agents Bertrand and Hardy should … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on LA4: Probation search unreasonable because PO not there; clearly pretext for criminal search

ND: Even a frequent visitor isn’t sufficiently connected to a probationer’s property to be subject to his probation search waiver

A mere visitor, albeit a frequent one, is not subject to search as an occupant of the premises under a probation search waiver. He has an insufficient connection to the property to be subject to the occupant’s waiver. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on ND: Even a frequent visitor isn’t sufficiently connected to a probationer’s property to be subject to his probation search waiver

CA9: Omission of 4A probation search waiver from wiretap application didn’t mean anything

Omitting the fact defendant was subject to a search waiver wasn’t material to a wiretap application. It’s omission from the wiretap affidavit didn’t matter. United States v. Rodriguez, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 4429 (9th Cir. March 14, 2017). Defendant couldn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA9: Omission of 4A probation search waiver from wiretap application didn’t mean anything

CA9: Officer has to be aware of parole or probation search waiver before the search happens

The officer has to be aware of parole or probation search waiver before the search happens, if that’s the justification. United States v. Job, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 4428 (9th Cir. March 14, 2017):

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA9: Officer has to be aware of parole or probation search waiver before the search happens

SD: Living with a parolee reduces your expectation of privacy in premises as to nonparolee

Defendant lived with a parolee, so she had a diminished expectation of privacy in their home (here a motel room) from parole searches. In a spot UA check, he tested positive at the home for methamphetamine, and then police asked … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on SD: Living with a parolee reduces your expectation of privacy in premises as to nonparolee

ND: Cell phone subject to probation search of house where CP suspected to be on it

Defendant was on supervised probation, and his PO received information from his girlfriend that he had “provocative” pictures of clothed young girls he was uploading to a cell phone that had no service. It was reasonable to seize and search … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on ND: Cell phone subject to probation search of house where CP suspected to be on it

ID: 4A waiver not mentioned at sentencing couldn’t later be imposed by PO

When defendant was sentenced, there was no Fourth Amendment waiver mentioned by the court, and the sentencing and probation order didn’t mention it. Six weeks later, he was forced to sign a Fourth Amendment waiver by his PO. That waiver … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on ID: 4A waiver not mentioned at sentencing couldn’t later be imposed by PO

CA8: Adding search condition to supervised release after serving 26 years didn’t violate ex post facto clause

Defendant served about 26 years of a 30½ year sentence, and, after release, a search condition was added, and it did not violate the ex post facto clause. United States v. Winston, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 3685 (8th Cir. March … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA8: Adding search condition to supervised release after serving 26 years didn’t violate ex post facto clause