Category Archives: Drug or alcohol testing

NC: The right to have counsel present during a breathalyzer test doesn’t apply to blood draws under a search warrant

The right to have counsel present during a breathalyzer test doesn’t apply to blood draws under a search warrant. State v. Shepley, 2014 N.C. App. LEXIS 1124 (November 4, 2014): “During the administration of a breathalyzer test, the person being … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NC: The right to have counsel present during a breathalyzer test doesn’t apply to blood draws under a search warrant

Idaho implied consent statute is not a per se exception to the warrant requirement under McNeely

The Idaho implied consent statute is not a per se exception to the warrant requirement under McNeely. State v. Wolff, 2014 Ida. LEXIS 286 (October 29, 2014):

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on Idaho implied consent statute is not a per se exception to the warrant requirement under McNeely

IL: No exigency justified the blood draw or dispensing with SW

There was no exigency justifying dispensing with a warrant for a blood draw in this case. The officer never considered a warrant [probably because it was pre-McNeely]. People v. Armer, 2014 IL App (5th) 130342, 2014 Ill. App. LEXIS 748 … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: No exigency justified the blood draw or dispensing with SW

OH2: Def’s position in a forfeiture on a piece of property was estoppel on standing in a criminal case

Judicial estoppel: Defendant had no standing in a video camera seized during a drug raid that had a video of him having sex with an impaired victim where he denied in a separate forfeiture proceeding that the camera was his. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Forfeiture, Inventory, Standing | Comments Off on OH2: Def’s position in a forfeiture on a piece of property was estoppel on standing in a criminal case

OR: Order for resting nystagmus test in front of jury was a search

During defendant’s DUI trial, the question of whether defendant was tested for resting nystagmus was raised because it wasn’t in the field notes. Then the state asked for and got a test for resting nystagmus of the defendant in front … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonableness, Search | Comments Off on OR: Order for resting nystagmus test in front of jury was a search

Cal.1st: Davis good faith exception applied to a pre-McNeely DUI warrantless blood draw

Davis good faith exception applied to a pre-McNeely DUI warrantless blood draw. People v. Rossetti, 2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 950 (1st Dist. October 22, 2014). 911 call from a name eyewitness to shots fired did not need corroboration. “In general, … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Forfeiture, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on Cal.1st: Davis good faith exception applied to a pre-McNeely DUI warrantless blood draw

MO: GFE didn’t apply where clearly no PC and police exceeded the scope of the warrant

The trial court found the affidavit for the search warrant lacked a substantial basis for finding probable cause and that the officers acted in bad faith in exceeding the scope of a drug and paraphernalia warrant to seize BB gun … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on MO: GFE didn’t apply where clearly no PC and police exceeded the scope of the warrant

OR: Where defendant was to be booked and released, jail search was unreasonable

Search at jail wasn’t shown to be necessary or inevitable, and state conceded error (decided under state constitution). Defendant likely would have been booked and released. State v. Moulton, 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 1372 (October 8, 2014).* Defendant’s refusal to … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Special needs, Standing | Comments Off on OR: Where defendant was to be booked and released, jail search was unreasonable

TX9: Officer’s getting SW for black box first showed he could get SW for blood too; suppressed

The officer had the time and wherewithal to get an immediate search warrant for the defendant’s vehicle’s “black box” so he also had time to get one for defendant’s blood. State v. Anderson, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 11151 (Tex. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on TX9: Officer’s getting SW for black box first showed he could get SW for blood too; suppressed

N.D.Iowa: Following defendant into his driveway did not violate curtilage

Following defendant into his driveway did not violate curtilage. The officer walked around the truck to see if it matched one in a store surveillance video. United States v. Rojas, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140708 (N.D. Iowa October 3, 2014), … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Following defendant into his driveway did not violate curtilage

OR: Impoundment of defendant’s car in his own driveway was unreasonable

In an almost identical case, the Ninth Circuit previously held that impoundment of defendant’s car parked in his own driveway was unconstitutional. Using the community caretaking to seize defendant’s car from his driveway for safekeeping was unreasonable. State v. Gonzales, … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Inventory, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on OR: Impoundment of defendant’s car in his own driveway was unreasonable

M.D.Tenn.: Def agreed to suspicionless probation searches

Defendant agreed to suspicionless probation searches, and this one is sustained under Samson. United States v. Tessier, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137301 (M.D. Tenn. September 29, 2014).* A dog alert on a motorhome for drugs justified a search of it. … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: Def agreed to suspicionless probation searches

MI: Failure to appeal drug testing of deliquent’s parents until after refusal to test a year later was waiver

A drug testing and search condition of a delinquent’s parents and home was in effect a year before there was a refusal on Fourth Amendment grounds. The objection comes too late. If the order was unconstitutional, which it might have … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Motion to suppress, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on MI: Failure to appeal drug testing of deliquent’s parents until after refusal to test a year later was waiver

Grits for Breakfast: Texas’ mandatory blood draw statute on DWI under fire

Grits for Breakfast: Texas’ mandatory blood draw statute on DWI under fire: Texas’ warrantless blood draw statute has been challenged and in some cases declared unconstitutional by intermediate state appellate judges in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2013 McNeely … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on Grits for Breakfast: Texas’ mandatory blood draw statute on DWI under fire

Watchdog.org: Bloodletting could be in store for Mississippi drivers at DUI checkpoints

Watchdog.org: Bloodletting could be in store for Mississippi drivers at DUI checkpoints by Steve Wilson: Over the long Labor Day weekend, the patrol ran a no-refusal DUI checkpoint in Oxford, home of the University of Mississippi. In a no-refusal checkpoint, … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Roadblocks | Comments Off on Watchdog.org: Bloodletting could be in store for Mississippi drivers at DUI checkpoints

Cal.2d & SD: Pre-McNeely warrantless blood draws saved by Davis GFE

A 2011 DWI blood draw that today would violate McNeely is saved by the Davis good faith exception. People v. Youn, 2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 799 (2d Dist. August 15, 2014), ordered published September 5, 2014. The pre-McNeely warrantless blood … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception | Comments Off on Cal.2d & SD: Pre-McNeely warrantless blood draws saved by Davis GFE

S.D.Fla.: Where subject of SW is cash, it was reasonable here to conclude it was in defendant’s home

In a white collar case involving receipts of large sums of cash, it was reasonable for the USMJ to conclude on the totality that evidence, like cash, would be found in defendant’s home. United States v. Martinez, 2014 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Where subject of SW is cash, it was reasonable here to conclude it was in defendant’s home

OH9: Merely having open garage door for a couple of days didn’t warrant emergency aid entry

The emergency aid exception did not warrant entry into defendant’s home and finding marijuana. Neighbors reported that the garage door had been open for a couple of days, and that was unusual. There was no sign of breaking and entering, … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH9: Merely having open garage door for a couple of days didn’t warrant emergency aid entry

TX10: Implied consent law not unconstitutional; doesn’t mandate 4A violation

The Texas implied consent statute mandating blood samples in certain types of cases is not facially unconstitutional because it does not mandate violating the Fourth Amendment. McGruder v. State, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 9022 (Tex. App. – Waco August 14, … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on TX10: Implied consent law not unconstitutional; doesn’t mandate 4A violation

TN: Exigency of 2 hr hospital wait supported warrantless blood draw in DUI

Exigency supported a warrantless blood draw here because defendant was in the hospital over two hours after a motorcycle accident where he was treated for his injuries and the officer got little or no time to deal with him. State … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: Exigency of 2 hr hospital wait supported warrantless blood draw in DUI