Category Archives: § 1983 / Bivens

OH11: Officers had reason to believe def at home; entry and plain view valid

Officers had an arrest warrant for defendant and knocked at her apartment door saying only “Sheriff’s Office.” A falsetto voice said “Ashley’s not here.” Officers responded “How do you know we’re looking for Ashley?” They were let in, and they … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on OH11: Officers had reason to believe def at home; entry and plain view valid

IL: Lost page of affidavit for SW can be proved without resort to formality of Court Records Restoration Act

When page two of the original complaint for search warrant disappeared, the state was not required to comply with the Court Records Restoration Act to prove up the search warrant at the suppression hearing. A normally authenticated copy would do. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Administrative search, Burden of proof, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on IL: Lost page of affidavit for SW can be proved without resort to formality of Court Records Restoration Act

ID: “There is no constitutional right not to be mistaken for a criminal. ‘The Constitution does not guarantee that only the guilty will be arrested.'”

Plaintiff was a sublessee of a dental office laboratory but was seen breaking in through a window by a neighbor who called 911. Police arrived and the reporter said the woman appeared drunk or on drugs. The first officer to … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Seizure | Comments Off on ID: “There is no constitutional right not to be mistaken for a criminal. ‘The Constitution does not guarantee that only the guilty will be arrested.'”

E.D.Ky.: One month old information about a gun is not stale

The CI’s seeing a gun in defendant’s house a month before the warrant issued is not stale at all. “The Affidavit established a fair probability that firearms would be found.” Also, the detail of the affidavit provided cross–corroboration. Finally, defendant’s … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: One month old information about a gun is not stale

S.D.N.Y.: Amtrak officers are “railroad police” under New York law and subject to § 1983

Amtrak police are “railroad police” under New York law, and they are subject to § 1983. (Fourth Amendment claim dismissed; other claims survive.) Chunn v. Amtrak, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176987 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 6, 2015), adopted 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Amtrak officers are “railroad police” under New York law and subject to § 1983

CA8: Execution of white collar SW with bulletproof vests, sidearms, and sirens wasn’t unreasonable

Execution of a white collar search warrant by officers of the SBA and IRS with bulletproof vests, sidearms, and sirens blaring was not unreasonable as a matter of law. Policy required they be armed during the raid. While a couple … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Dog sniff, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA8: Execution of white collar SW with bulletproof vests, sidearms, and sirens wasn’t unreasonable

NY: False confession forwarded to DA for grand jury supports common law malicious prosecution and § 1983 claim

“Evidence that the officers forwarded the false confession to prosecutors can satisfy the commencement element of a malicious prosecution cause of action, and the proof of the absence of probable cause for the prosecution and the police’s transmission of the … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Police misconduct | Comments Off on NY: False confession forwarded to DA for grand jury supports common law malicious prosecution and § 1983 claim

CA5: Excessive force ptf has to show how clearly established law was violated; here, they did not

A search for business records was done with force and guns drawn because of officers’ fear of retaliation because the business owner didn’t like the ordinance he was to pay sales taxes under. When police entered, the owner drew his … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA5: Excessive force ptf has to show how clearly established law was violated; here, they did not

M.D.Ala.: Younger abstention bars § 1983 case over drug search filed while state criminal case is pending

Plaintiff from the county jail sued the drug task force that arrested him while the criminal case was pending. His claim is barred by Younger abstention. The case is dismissed except as to a damages claim which is stayed pending … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Younger abstention bars § 1983 case over drug search filed while state criminal case is pending

CA6: Judicial immunity against false arrest damages case for judge ordering confinement for non-payment of fines

A municipal judge and clerk were absolutely immune from a damages claim for false arrest under § 1983 where the judge ordered the defendant to jail for nonpayment of fines. Even if wrong, they are judicial acts entitled to immunity. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA6: Judicial immunity against false arrest damages case for judge ordering confinement for non-payment of fines

CA4: Feres doctrine barred Army NG officer’s § 1983 email search claim when he was deployed

Plaintiff was a Colonel in the North Carolina Army National Guard stationed in Kuwait, and he claimed that his email was unlawfully searched by another officer and forwarded around in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights. The Feres doctrine, requiring … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Military searches | Comments Off on CA4: Feres doctrine barred Army NG officer’s § 1983 email search claim when he was deployed

CA11: After an illegal drug search, the exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to a § 1983 case

Plaintiffs were the target of a search warrant of their property which got suppressed in Georgia state court. Then they sued the cops, and qualified immunity was denied. The cops appealed, and the exclusionary was held inapplicable to the civil … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on CA11: After an illegal drug search, the exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to a § 1983 case

CA7: In a § 1983 case, “Simply put, evidence of a prior arrest does not support a conclusion that the arrested person has in fact broken the law.”

Plaintiff sued the City of Chicago for a 2008 false arrest that the officers say never happened, and there was a defense verdict. Evidence of plaintiff’s prior arrests between 1983 and 1999 were irrelevant and prejudicial. An arrest doesn’t mean … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CA7: In a § 1983 case, “Simply put, evidence of a prior arrest does not support a conclusion that the arrested person has in fact broken the law.”

CA11: Unarmed, compliant, and nonresisting arrestee shot in the back while lying on the ground was excessive force and violates clearly established law

Unarmed, compliant, and nonresisting arrestee shot in the back while lying on the ground was excessive force and violates clearly established law. Denial of qualified immunity denied. The officer’s subjective belief that force was necessary doesn’t carry any weight when … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Unarmed, compliant, and nonresisting arrestee shot in the back while lying on the ground was excessive force and violates clearly established law

SD: A pipe with residue on the person is PC for an automobile exception search

The officer decided to stop defendant who was parked under a “no parking” sign. When he approached the vehicle, an open container was visible between the driver and passenger seats. It turned out defendant’s DL was revoked. While normally a … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Automobile exception | Comments Off on SD: A pipe with residue on the person is PC for an automobile exception search

CA7: Not a Fourth Amendment violation to physically arrest for a fine only traffic infraction

It is not a Fourth Amendment violation to physically arrest for a fine only traffic infraction. Williams v. Brooks, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 68 (7th Cir. Jan. 5, 2016):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Not a Fourth Amendment violation to physically arrest for a fine only traffic infraction

CA7: Guilty plea didn’t preclude § 1983 claim for illegal search

Plaintiff’s guilty plea that waived his search issues did not have a preclusive effect on a later civil case that the officers violated his Fourth Amendment rights. Kykta v. Ciaccio, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 22417 (7th Cir. Dec. 22, 2015):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA7: Guilty plea didn’t preclude § 1983 claim for illegal search

CA8: Tasering suspected armed and dangerous arrestee was subject to qualified immunity, even when it turned out officers were reasonably mistaken as to ID of suspect

U.S. Marshals reasonably believed the plaintiff was a wanted armed and dangerous felon. He backed away and refused to submit to arrest and was Tasered. “We have since confirmed that ‘non-violent, non-fleeing subjects have a clearly established right to be … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: Tasering suspected armed and dangerous arrestee was subject to qualified immunity, even when it turned out officers were reasonably mistaken as to ID of suspect

CA9: California MMJ card doesn’t immunize all marijuana SWs

Mere possession of a California MMJ card doesn’t render all search warrants for marijuana unreasonable as a matter of law. § 1983 case dismissed. Rocha v. County of Tulare, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 21999 (9th Cir. Dec. 17, 2015):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA9: California MMJ card doesn’t immunize all marijuana SWs

ABAJ: Federal judge says lawyer and client must pay $19K for filing baseless civil rights suit for false arrest

ABAJ: Federal judge says lawyer and client must pay $19K for filing baseless civil rights suit by Martha Neil. In a false arrest case, “The plaintiff’s lawyer should have known that the purported facts on which a civil rights suit … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Police misconduct | Comments Off on ABAJ: Federal judge says lawyer and client must pay $19K for filing baseless civil rights suit for false arrest