Category Archives: Inventory

E.D.Mich.: Officers’ efforts to avoid towing vehicle on def’s arrest showed lack of pretext to search it

The government satisfied its burden in showing that the inventory of defendant’s car was reasonable and not for an investigative purpose. Important to that, they attempted to work with defendant to avoid towing the vehicle at all by getting a … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Informant hearsay, Inventory | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Officers’ efforts to avoid towing vehicle on def’s arrest showed lack of pretext to search it

D.P.R.: Lack of paperwork on inventory at hearing is troubling, but the inventory was still valid

Not leaving defendant’s car in the “largest shopping mall in the Caribbean” justified removal and inventory of the car. The lack of paperwork at the hearing was troubling, but not unconstitutional. United States v. Villa-Guillen, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123537 … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Lack of paperwork on inventory at hearing is troubling, but the inventory was still valid

CA2: Second inventory search on the street was reasonable

Defendant’s car was inventoried by NYPD. After the first search, officers overheard defendant’s phone call that somebody needed to come and get the car “now,” and they surmised they overlooked something important. A second inventory was conducted, and the NYPD … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA2: Second inventory search on the street was reasonable

CA11: Officers get QI for stop of apparent burglars

The defendant officers’ actions were justified and subject to qualified immunity. They were patrolling an area known for daytime burglaries and saw plaintiff lurking along the side of homes and stopped to inquire and found that one house was open. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Ineffective assistance, Inventory, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Officers get QI for stop of apparent burglars

E.D.Tex.: Driver’s arrest justified impoundment and inventory under dept’s policy

“In this case, Defendant, the driver and sole occupant of the vehicle, had been arrested. It was likely the vehicle would be unattended for an extended period of time. Per department policy, the arresting officers caused the vehicle to be … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Inventory | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Driver’s arrest justified impoundment and inventory under dept’s policy

D.N.M.: Inventory was unjustified

It was apparent the officer wanted to search defendant’s car, so he devised a way to seize it, but it was without justification. Thus, the inventory was unreasonable. United States v. James, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82527 (D. N.M. May … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Inventory was unjustified

E.D.N.Y.: Search of car’s fuse box reasonable in an inventory

The search of a car’s fuse box was reasonable under the inventory search exception. The body cameras were on when the inventory started and then were turned off. The court declines to find that this showed bad faith because everything … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Search of car’s fuse box reasonable in an inventory

NC: Failure to object to satellite-based monitoring in trial court was waiver

Defendant didn’t raise the constitutionality of satellite-based monitoring in the trial court, so it’s waived for appeal. He also can’t bring it up by certiorari. State v. DeJesus, 2019 N.C. App. LEXIS 384 (May 7, 2019). Reasonable suspicion developed at … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NC: Failure to object to satellite-based monitoring in trial court was waiver

D.Wis.: Property renter didn’t yet have standing to challenge ordinance for renter information under 4A

Suit over a county ordinance that short term rental properties have to allow government access to their guest registries as a violation of the Fourth Amendment was moot. Plaintiff hadn’t filed the paperwork under the ordinance so he doesn’t yet … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Standing | Comments Off on D.Wis.: Property renter didn’t yet have standing to challenge ordinance for renter information under 4A

S.D.Fla.: Generically describing in an inventory “tools” and “misc items” was constitutionally adequate to show true inventory

Describing a lot of stuff in defendant’s car as “tools” and “misc items” was good enough. “Officer Jas also testified that having the inventory search recorded in his BWC served to verify the accuracy of his paperwork. Having considered Officer … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Generically describing in an inventory “tools” and “misc items” was constitutionally adequate to show true inventory

MD: The actual inventory is the list of what was seized, not necessarily from exactly where it was seized

“What the inventory must list, as was properly done in this case, is the property that was actually seized, not the rooms that were searched. To describe the scope of the search is not the function of an inventory list.” … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Standards of review | Comments Off on MD: The actual inventory is the list of what was seized, not necessarily from exactly where it was seized

NE: Search of the person here was valid an an inventory at the jail

The search of defendant’s person at the jail after his arrest was valid as an inventory search. State v. Garcia, 302 Neb. 406 (Mar. 8, 2019). “As set forth above, the undersigned does not agree with Defendant that the affidavit … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Inventory | Comments Off on NE: Search of the person here was valid an an inventory at the jail

OR: Def ordered from car left purse inside, and it was subject to inventory (update)

Defendant was ordered out of the car, and she left her purse inside. Her purse was legitimately subjected to the inventory since it was left in the car. State v. Fulmer, 296 Ore. App. 61, 2019 Ore. App. LEXIS 190 … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Inventory | Comments Off on OR: Def ordered from car left purse inside, and it was subject to inventory (update)

CA8: Lesser intrusive measures to inventory not constitutionally required

The inventory was appropriately conducted within the policy of the department. Defendant had no constitutional right to have somebody come to pick up the car before inventory. The police could do that if convenient, but they weren’t required to do … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on CA8: Lesser intrusive measures to inventory not constitutionally required

S.D.Ind.: Towing and inventory objectively reasonable; subjective motive doesn’t matter

The towing and inventory of defendant’s vehicle was objectively reasonable. His later assertion that he uncovered evidence of a subjective motivation for towing and inventory is insufficient to overcome the objective basis. United States v. Vales, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: Towing and inventory objectively reasonable; subjective motive doesn’t matter

S.D.Ohio: Cursory search of garage was permissible protective sweep

The bodycam video shows that the entry into the house for a search was by consent of a co-occupant. A cursory search of garage was permitted under protective sweep. United States v. Russell, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9977 (S.D. Ohio … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Protective sweep | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Cursory search of garage was permissible protective sweep

D.N.M.: Inventory of a locked backpack was reasonable and within dept regs

The inventory of defendant’s locked backpack when he was taken into custody was within departmental policy which was followed and was otherwise reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Trujillo, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184486 (D. N.M. Oct. 29, … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Inventory of a locked backpack was reasonable and within dept regs

OH6: Leaving house to do a drug deal and going back home right after is inference drugs at home

The affiant’s allegation that defendant left his house to conduct drug deals then returned there right afterward creates a reasonable inference that drugs are kept in the house. Thus, there was probable cause for the search warrant. State v. Pettaway, … Continue reading →

Posted in Forfeiture, Inventory, Nexus | Comments Off on OH6: Leaving house to do a drug deal and going back home right after is inference drugs at home

CA5 sustains an inventory that certainly appears pretextual criminal search

“An inventory search of a vehicle is reasonable if it is conducted pursuant to standardized regulations and procedures. McKinnon, 681 F.3d at 209-10. Alvarez contends the officers did not follow CCPD’s standard procedures, which require officers to complete and submit … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on CA5 sustains an inventory that certainly appears pretextual criminal search

GA: Search of a backpack six days after seizure required a SW

Defendant was granted a new murder trial on ineffective assistance of counsel grounds, one of which was failure to file a motion to suppress. On remand to the trial court, he pursued the motion to suppress claiming that a search … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on GA: Search of a backpack six days after seizure required a SW