MD: The actual inventory is the list of what was seized, not necessarily from exactly where it was seized

“What the inventory must list, as was properly done in this case, is the property that was actually seized, not the rooms that were searched. To describe the scope of the search is not the function of an inventory list.” Hogan v. State, 2019 Md. App. LEXIS 267 (Mar. 29, 2019)

Alleged revocation of consent urged on appeal was rejected on the credibility of witnesses. United States v. EastmanUnited States v. EastmanUnited States v. Eastman, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 9297 (2d Cir. Mar. 29, 2019).*

This entry was posted in Inventory, Standards of review. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.