Category Archives: Inventory

TX14: Bodycam video supported trial court’s findings of voluntariness of consent to search

The bodycam video supports the trial court’s conclusion that the consent to search was voluntarily given. Blue v. State, 2019 Tex. App. LEXIS 10658 (Tex. App. – Houston (14th Dist.) Dec. 10, 2019) (with a dissent). “Kelley’s only claim–a Fourth … Continue reading →

Posted in Body cameras, Consent, Inventory, Search incident | Comments Off on TX14: Bodycam video supported trial court’s findings of voluntariness of consent to search

CA4: Search of def’s backpack and finding gun was inevitable because it would have been inventoried in any event

“The evidence presented to the district court supported a finding that the firearm inevitably would have been discovered during an inventory search of the plastic bag. Officers Lucy and DiPentima testified that it was standard procedure to inventory an arrestee’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA4: Search of def’s backpack and finding gun was inevitable because it would have been inventoried in any event

OH11: Failure to provide an inventory after a search is ministerial and not a fundamental right

“Even presuming no inventory was completed or provided to Thompson, however, this did not result in prejudice or provide any grounds for relief. It has been held that ‘the preparation and return of an inventory is ministerial’ and ‘does not … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inventory, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OH11: Failure to provide an inventory after a search is ministerial and not a fundamental right

D.N.M.: No 4A requirement police call for someone to retrieve car to avoid inventory

The inventory of defendant’s car was reasonable and followed policy. “The problem with Defendant’s argument is that he advanced no legal authority that the Fourth Amendment requires police to execute an arrest warrant on a suspect in a way that … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inventory | Comments Off on D.N.M.: No 4A requirement police call for someone to retrieve car to avoid inventory

D.N.M.: Def’s car’s impoundment wasn’t justified by community caretaking function or need for inventory

The impoundment of defendant’s car wasn’t justified by either the community caretaking function or need for inventory. Whether the vehicle was even involved in a crime was inconclusive at best. United States v. Trujillo, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 201024 (D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, Community caretaking function, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Def’s car’s impoundment wasn’t justified by community caretaking function or need for inventory

OH2: Def’s allegedly carrying a rifle in an apartment building parking lot, even if true, wasn’t RS

A phone call to the police said there was a man walking through an apartment building parking lot carrying a rifle, something that wasn’t a crime. Police responded and saw defendant. They approached him when he wasn’t carrying a rifle, … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH2: Def’s allegedly carrying a rifle in an apartment building parking lot, even if true, wasn’t RS

E.D.Wis.: Handgun hidden in a dog house wasn’t subject to search for exigency

Defendant’s handgun was hidden in a doghouse on the curtilage. The court distinguishes other cases allowing a search for a firearm, particularly one where a loaded shotgun was publicly put in the trunk of a car and the keys left … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Emergency / exigency, Inventory | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Handgun hidden in a dog house wasn’t subject to search for exigency

CO: Vehicle inventory fails where no showing of policy enabling it

The inventory of defendant’s car was not done according to any policy, and it is not justifiable under the automobile exception or as a protective search for weapons either. People v. Allen, 2019 CO 88, 2019 Colo. LEXIS 1077 (Oct. … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on CO: Vehicle inventory fails where no showing of policy enabling it

E.D.Mich.: Court doesn’t believe officer on inventory as a justification, but impoundment of the vehicle would have happened anyway

“Defendant David Arnold was arrested for and charged with possession of a firearm by a felon after the Detroit police found a stolen handgun in the glovebox of the car he was driving. The police stopped the car because the … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Inventory | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Court doesn’t believe officer on inventory as a justification, but impoundment of the vehicle would have happened anyway

MA: Traffic stop “morphed” into arrest for no DL, inventory, then automobile exception

Driving on a suspended license is an offense for which (1) search incident is valid, and (2) the driver can’t continue and the vehicle would be impounded and subject to a proper inventory. In this case, the inventory was not … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Inventory | Comments Off on MA: Traffic stop “morphed” into arrest for no DL, inventory, then automobile exception

OH1: State had burden to show inventory policy was followed and done in good faith

When the state relies on inventory to justify a search of a car, it has to put on proof that the inventory policy was followed and that it was done in good faith. State v. Beasley, 2019-Ohio-3936, 2019 Ohio App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Inventory | Comments Off on OH1: State had burden to show inventory policy was followed and done in good faith

WA grants automatic standing to a car thief but finds inventory of the car reasonable

“We are asked to answer two questions under article I, section 7 of our state constitution: first, whether defendants have standing to challenge the scope of a warrantless inventory search of a vehicle when that vehicle is stolen and, second, … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Standing | Comments Off on WA grants automatic standing to a car thief but finds inventory of the car reasonable

N.D.Fla.: No 4A requirement a car left in a parking lot on def’s arrest couldn’t be towed and inventoried

The driver of the vehicle was a serial violator of the state statute on driving on a suspended license. When he was caught this time, the vehicle was on a parking lot and the officer elected to have it towed, … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on N.D.Fla.: No 4A requirement a car left in a parking lot on def’s arrest couldn’t be towed and inventoried

N.D.Okla.: Impoundment and inventory was non-pretextual and reasonable

The impoundment and inventory of defendant’s rented car was reasonable under all the circumstances at the time it happened, and it was factually justified and not pretextual. It would have been left in a high crime area on private property, … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: Impoundment and inventory was non-pretextual and reasonable

CA9: Failure to list a cell phone on the inventory sheet doesn’t void its seizure

Defendant’s cell phone was seized from his car when it was impounded after a high speed chase. The fact it was omitted from the inventory sheet does not make its seizure unreasonable. It was ultimately searched with a search warrant. … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA9: Failure to list a cell phone on the inventory sheet doesn’t void its seizure

D.Mass.: Police had no affirmative duty to allow def to call for help to remove car to avoid inventory

Police had no duty to let defendant call somebody to come and get his car rather than it be inventoried. “But WPD’s policy and practice plainly do not dictate that officers affirmatively inquire about the availability of a third-party driver. … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Police had no affirmative duty to allow def to call for help to remove car to avoid inventory

OH2: Def taken to hospital for mental eval couldn’t have clothes inventoried by police because of lack of arrest

Defendant was detained and taken to a hospital for a mental evaluation. He was made to change into hospital clothing, and his clothes were placed in a hospital property bag. The police inventory of the bag wasn’t justified because defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Inventory | Comments Off on OH2: Def taken to hospital for mental eval couldn’t have clothes inventoried by police because of lack of arrest

D.N.M.: Inventory didn’t follow sufficiently standardized procedures and was pretextual to search

The tow policy of the police department was discretionary (“may tow”) and defendant hadn’t yet been arrested when the decision was made to tow without giving options. Therefore, the government didn’t meet its burden that the decision to tow was … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Inventory didn’t follow sufficiently standardized procedures and was pretextual to search

CA11: Officer has discretion to let another take vehicle or impound it with inventory, and he can change his mind

Allowing defendant’s vehicle to be taken by another instead of impounding it was within the officer’s discretion. At first he said he would do that, then changed his mind. That doesn’t make the inventory unreasonable. United States v. Sibert, 2019 … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Inventory | Comments Off on CA11: Officer has discretion to let another take vehicle or impound it with inventory, and he can change his mind

IN: Failure to prove dept’l inventory policy fatal to inventory search; officer calling search one thing but DA not arguing it is waiver

The state didn’t support the departmental inventory policy at trial, and that was error. Also, what the officer calls a search (here “search incident”) the prosecutor didn’t, and that argument was waived for appeal. Smith v. State, 2019 Ind. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Inventory | Comments Off on IN: Failure to prove dept’l inventory policy fatal to inventory search; officer calling search one thing but DA not arguing it is waiver