Category Archives: Warrant requirement

M.D.La.: Year long seizure of a hard drive without getting a warrant was unreasonable

A computer tech was hired to transfer information from an old hard drive to a new computer in 2007, and he stumbled upon child pornography and called the FBI. They met, and he brought the hard drive. Defendant’s email address … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Reasonableness, Seizure, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Year long seizure of a hard drive without getting a warrant was unreasonable

GA: Lost original affidavit for SW may be proved by testimony

A lost original affidavit for a search warrant can still be proved by testimony that the warrant was otherwise validly issued. Thus, defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging it on appeal where the record was made on the lost … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Probation / Parole search, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on GA: Lost original affidavit for SW may be proved by testimony

OR: Impoundment of defendant’s car in his own driveway was unreasonable

In an almost identical case, the Ninth Circuit previously held that impoundment of defendant’s car parked in his own driveway was unconstitutional. Using the community caretaking to seize defendant’s car from his driveway for safekeeping was unreasonable. State v. Gonzales, … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Inventory, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on OR: Impoundment of defendant’s car in his own driveway was unreasonable

E.D.Mich.: ATF can investigate drug crimes and procure SWs

“Defendant argues the search warrant giving rise to the charges in the Indictment was defective because the ATF does not have authority to conduct state narcotics investigations.” The connection between guns and drugs is well known, and the ATF can … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: ATF can investigate drug crimes and procure SWs

Grits for Breakfast: Texas’ mandatory blood draw statute on DWI under fire

Grits for Breakfast: Texas’ mandatory blood draw statute on DWI under fire: Texas’ warrantless blood draw statute has been challenged and in some cases declared unconstitutional by intermediate state appellate judges in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2013 McNeely … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on Grits for Breakfast: Texas’ mandatory blood draw statute on DWI under fire

TX1: Fire scene search of unprotected property months after fire not unlawful

Months after a fire, arson investigators entered defendant’s property again to try to determine the source of the fire. It was not a criminal investigation yet. Significant here was that defendant hadn’t done anything to secure the premises, contrary to … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Stop and frisk, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on TX1: Fire scene search of unprotected property months after fire not unlawful

S.D.Tex.: “This protection is at its strongest when a man has retreated into his own home to be free from the expanding gunmen of the state.”

In a remarkable case, the police use really old information and a search warrant previously obtained apparently by perjury, which they disregard and attempt to use the consent of a person they already knew didn’t even live in the house … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: “This protection is at its strongest when a man has retreated into his own home to be free from the expanding gunmen of the state.”

AK: Officer sticking foot in the door to keep it from closing crosses the threshold and is a Fourth Amendment entry

Officers went to a house looking for a probation absconder who had apparently disconnected his GPS. When they knocked, defendant opened the door, and the officer stuck his foot in the door. Perceiving defendant to be fidgety and nervous, they … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on AK: Officer sticking foot in the door to keep it from closing crosses the threshold and is a Fourth Amendment entry

TX4: Reverses self on remand from McNeely: warrant was required

On remand from SCOTUS after McNeely, the Texas Court of Appeals in San Antonio reverses itself and held that a warrant was required for defendant’s blood draw. Aviles v. State, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 8508 (Tex. App. – San Antonio … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on TX4: Reverses self on remand from McNeely: warrant was required

CA7: Warrantless seizure of alleged contraband wasn’t covered yet by FTCA; GJ in session

The DEA’s warrantless seizure of the plaintiff’s fake incense products which the DEA considered contraband but wasn’t declared such until just after the seizure didn’t state a claim for separate relief yet for a seizure for forfeiture. The government apparently … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA7: Warrantless seizure of alleged contraband wasn’t covered yet by FTCA; GJ in session

TN: Tracking no. typo not prejudicial in SW

Presented as an IAC claim, defendant’s claim that the tracking number on the package on the anticipatory warrant had a typo was not sufficient to void the search. It was not a prejudicial error. Davidson v. State, 2014 Tenn. Crim. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on TN: Tracking no. typo not prejudicial in SW

NJ: No violation of “neutral and detached magistrate” requirement where issuing magistrate didn’t remember prior prosecution of one defendant when an ADA

The judge issuing the search warrant here had, over six years earlier, as an ADA prosecuted one of the eight defendants in this case. He didn’t remember the case. When it was brought to his attention, he recused from the … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on NJ: No violation of “neutral and detached magistrate” requirement where issuing magistrate didn’t remember prior prosecution of one defendant when an ADA

OH5: Traffic warrant did not authorize entry into home of third person to arrest

A traffic arrest warrant did not support entry into the premises of a third person where the police had less than a suspicion that the target was there. The entry led to finding evidence against the homeowner which is suppressed. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on OH5: Traffic warrant did not authorize entry into home of third person to arrest

WaPo: Manassas City police release statement on teen ‘sexting’ case: Won’t seek warrant for picture of an erection

WaPo: Manassas City police release statement on teen ‘sexting’ case by Tom Jackman: In response to The Post’s story Wednesday about a felony sexting case in Prince William County, the Manassas City police released this statement shortly after 6 p.m. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness, Uncategorized, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on WaPo: Manassas City police release statement on teen ‘sexting’ case: Won’t seek warrant for picture of an erection

WaPo: In ‘sexting’ case, police want to take photo of teen’s erect genitalia, his lawyer says

WaPo: In ‘sexting’ case, police want to take photo of teen’s erect genitalia, his lawyer says by Tom Jackman: Manassas City police and Prince William County prosecutors are taking a unique approach to collecting evidence in a “sexting” case involving … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on WaPo: In ‘sexting’ case, police want to take photo of teen’s erect genitalia, his lawyer says

Law360: High Court Is Swinging Pendulum Back On 4th Amendment

Law360: High Court Is Swinging Pendulum Back On 4th Amendment Law360, New York (July 08, 2014, 10:44 AM ET) — Fourth Amendment law is anything but static. If one surveys the jurisprudential landscape over the last 50 years, there are … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on Law360: High Court Is Swinging Pendulum Back On 4th Amendment

D.Ariz.: Police merely entering a hospital room to talk is not a “search”

There was no Fourth Amendment violation from an officer coming into defendant’s hospital room to talk to him because it wasn’t a search. Even so, defendant consented to the officer’s presence. United States v. John, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86369 … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Police merely entering a hospital room to talk is not a “search”

sayanythingblog: Expert: John Doe raids raise ‘troubling’ Fourth Amendment questions

sayanythingblog: Expert: John Doe raids raise ‘troubling’ Fourth Amendment questions by M.D. Kittle: MADISON, Wis. – Troubling. That’s how one Fourth Amendment expert describes the manner in which search warrants were executed in a politically charged John Doe investigation into … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on sayanythingblog: Expert: John Doe raids raise ‘troubling’ Fourth Amendment questions

AL: Entry into third party’s home without SW to arrest was invalid as to third party

The U.S. Marshals had an arrest warrant for Nolan, and they put out word on the street. A CI reported that Nolan was at defendant’s house playing video games, so they went there and entered to arrest him. The entry … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on AL: Entry into third party’s home without SW to arrest was invalid as to third party

OR: Judge who issued SW was former public defender who recognized def’s name was still “neutral and detached”

A former deputy public defender was now a judge. On his first day in office, he was presented with a search warrant affidavit that mentioned defendant’s name. The judge vaguely remembered the name from about five years earlier, but none … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on OR: Judge who issued SW was former public defender who recognized def’s name was still “neutral and detached”