Category Archives: Warrant requirement

Slate: Google Says Proposed DoJ Warrant Tweaks Are “Monumental” Fourth Amendment Violation

Slate: Google Says Proposed DoJ Warrant Tweaks Are “Monumental” Fourth Amendment Violation by Lily Hay Newman: The Department of Justice has been working to revise a federal criminal procedure rule to make it easier for judges to issue search warrants … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on Slate: Google Says Proposed DoJ Warrant Tweaks Are “Monumental” Fourth Amendment Violation

S.D.Ala.: Failure to include the incorporated affidavit in the SW as executed was fatal to this search

The motion to reconsider is denied. The search warrant was lacking the incorporated affidavit when it was executed, and that defined the place to be searched. The government cites no supporting case law that having the affidavit in hand, at … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on S.D.Ala.: Failure to include the incorporated affidavit in the SW as executed was fatal to this search

D.Nev.: FBI internet ruse against USAO advice leads to suppression of entry by deception

The Hill: Court tosses warrant after FBI’s Internet ‘ruse’ by Cory Bennett: A federal magistrate judge is dismissing an FBI search warrant that led to the arrest of as many as eight people accused of running an illegal online sports … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Police misconduct, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.Nev.: FBI internet ruse against USAO advice leads to suppression of entry by deception

OH9: One day delay in getting cell phone SW after exigent based seizure not unreasonable

Police seized defendant’s phone because of suspected child pornography on it. The warrant to search the phone was not issued until the following day. Defendant cites no authority that a one day delay was unreasonable. State v. Welch, 2015-Ohio-284, 2015 … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Cell phones, Consent, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on OH9: One day delay in getting cell phone SW after exigent based seizure not unreasonable

NY, Bronx Co.: Wiretap minimization requirements are founded on the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and of particularity

Wiretap minimization requirements are founded on the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and of particularity. This is the case against NYPD officers accused of ticket fixing. People v. Anthony, 2015 NY Slip Op 25003, 2015 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 44 … Continue reading

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity, Reasonableness, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on NY, Bronx Co.: Wiretap minimization requirements are founded on the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and of particularity

MS: No requirement that owner of property be named in a SW

Neither the Fourth Amendment nor the state constitution require that the owner of property be named in the search warrant. The factual dispute over whether a signed warrant was present at the search was found against the defendant, who also … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on MS: No requirement that owner of property be named in a SW

E.D.Wis.: CSLI under the 4A can be used to track people, not just things

The cell phone tracking order was issued by a state court judge and it complied with the Fourth Amendment. The fact it was an “order” and not a “warrant” is a meaningless argument. A warrant can be used to locate … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: CSLI under the 4A can be used to track people, not just things

CA10: Unsigned search warrant curable by testimony; not a fatal defect

The Fourth Amendment does not require a search warrant be physically “signed” to issue. This case litigated it in detail in a § 2255 post-conviction proceeding relying on Groh. [See note below.] United States v. Cruz, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA10: Unsigned search warrant curable by testimony; not a fatal defect

Denver Post: Colorado DUI case sent to U.S. Supreme Court, focuses on blood tests

Denver Post: Colorado DUI case sent to U.S. Supreme Court, focuses on blood tests by Jorden Steffen: Arapahoe County prosecutors have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn a decision by a state judge and the Colorado Supreme Court, which … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on Denver Post: Colorado DUI case sent to U.S. Supreme Court, focuses on blood tests

ID applies McNeely and requires a warrant for DWI blood draws

McNeely requires a warrant for DWI BAC blood draws. State v. Halseth, 2014 Ida. LEXIS 313 (December 2, 2014). The EEOC sent emails about age discrimination to hundreds of plaintiff’s employees. The company sued the EEOC claiming, inter alia, a … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion, Standing, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on ID applies McNeely and requires a warrant for DWI blood draws

The Recorder: Judge Limits Feds’ Email Search Request

The Recorder: Judge Limits Feds’ Email Search Request by Ross Todd: Magistrate Judge Paul Grewal said he wouldn’t approve an indefinite gag order as part of a search warrant for a Hotmail account.

Posted in E-mail, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on The Recorder: Judge Limits Feds’ Email Search Request

TX: BAC testing not categorically subject to warrant exception; SW required here

After a few dozen appellate decisions on McNeely and Texas’s implied consent law, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals takes one on the state’s petition for discretionary review and holds “the warrantless, nonconsensual testing of a DWI suspect’s blood does … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on TX: BAC testing not categorically subject to warrant exception; SW required here

D.N.H.: Probable cause permits seizure of a cell phone and getting IMEI no. off back under Riley

Law enforcement officers with probable cause do not need a search warrant to seize a cell phone, such as in a search incident situation where they know that the phone was used to arrange drug deals, but they most probably … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.N.H.: Probable cause permits seizure of a cell phone and getting IMEI no. off back under Riley

The Atlantic: How FBI Lies Can Damage Civil Society

The Atlantic: How FBI Lies Can Damage Civil Society by Conor Friedersdorf: The FBI lies a lot. Sometimes that’s fully justified. Brave agents risk their lives to infiltrate terrorist cells, organized crime, and child-pornography rings. Subterfuge is vital to these … Continue reading

Posted in Police misconduct, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on The Atlantic: How FBI Lies Can Damage Civil Society

IL implied consent statute not unconstitutional under McNeely

Illinois’s implied-consent statutory scheme did not unconstitutionally circumvent defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights by punishing him for refusing to take the chemical analysis by suspending his driver’s license and introducing his refusal against him at his criminal trial. A per se … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on IL implied consent statute not unconstitutional under McNeely

OH3: There is a reasonable expectation of privacy in medical records; SW required

There is a reasonable expectation of privacy in medical records under Ferguson supported by McNeely. While statute may waive doctor-patient privilege, it does not waive the reasonable expectation of privacy. State v. Little, 2014-Ohio-4871, 2014 Ohio App. LEXIS 4743 (3d … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on OH3: There is a reasonable expectation of privacy in medical records; SW required

WaPo: Magistrate issues arrest warrants for 17 years but is new to “probable cause”

WaPo: Magistrate issues arrest warrants for 17 years but is new to “probable cause” by Orin Kerr: Here’s a remarkable case from the Ohio Supreme Court, State v. Hoffman, involving an unconstitutional arrest warrant. The defendant was arrested for a … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on WaPo: Magistrate issues arrest warrants for 17 years but is new to “probable cause”

Idaho implied consent statute is not a per se exception to the warrant requirement under McNeely

The Idaho implied consent statute is not a per se exception to the warrant requirement under McNeely. State v. Wolff, 2014 Ida. LEXIS 286 (October 29, 2014):

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on Idaho implied consent statute is not a per se exception to the warrant requirement under McNeely

TX8: That person signing affidavit for SW was different than one named at top didn’t matter–it’s an oath

The officer named as the affiant wasn’t the one who signed the affidavit for search warrant. That wasn’t material because was an oath by somebody. Patterson v. State, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 11996 (Tex. App.–El Paso October 31, 2014). A … Continue reading

Posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Seizure, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on TX8: That person signing affidavit for SW was different than one named at top didn’t matter–it’s an oath

W.D.Pa.: Obvious scrivener’s error as to limit of time to execute warrant could be overlooked

A search warrant was issued for defendant’s house, and an obvious scrivener’s error at the time the warrant was issued was entered into the space providing for the latest time when the warrant should be executed. That error could be … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Obvious scrivener’s error as to limit of time to execute warrant could be overlooked