IL implied consent statute not unconstitutional under McNeely

Illinois’s implied-consent statutory scheme did not unconstitutionally circumvent defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights by punishing him for refusing to take the chemical analysis by suspending his driver’s license and introducing his refusal against him at his criminal trial. A per se approach to warrantless blood draws had been rejected, and the dissipation of alcohol in the blood could support an exigency finding based on the totality of the circumstances. People v. Gaede, 2014 IL App (4th) 130346, 2014 Ill. App. LEXIS 772 (November 4, 2014).*

Defendant was not entitled to return of some of the property at issue under Rule 41(g) because it was evidence of the crime or a product of the financial crime. Coston v. United States, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156536 (N.D. N.Y. November 4, 2014).*

Reasonable suspicion of a window tint violation was apparent, and probable cause wasn’t needed for a stop. State v. Scott, 2014-Ohio-4963, 2014 Ohio App. LEXIS 4839 (2d Dist. November 7, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Warrant requirement. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.