Category Archives: Warrant requirement

D.N.M.: While affiant wasn’t sworn, other witnesses were in testifying on application

Defendant consented to a search after being told of the right to refuse. Officers also sought a search warrant for a safe from a tribal judge, and the affiant wasn’t sworn to. Additional testimony was, however. The consent saves the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.N.M.: While affiant wasn’t sworn, other witnesses were in testifying on application

TX2: Warrantless blood draw under TX statute still unconstitutional where no warrant exception applies

The nonconsensual and warrantless search and seizure of defendant’s blood, which the officer conducted under Tex. Transp. Code § 724.012 and without facts supporting an independent exception to the warrant requirement, violated the Fourth Amendment. State v. Swan, 2016 Tex. … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on TX2: Warrantless blood draw under TX statute still unconstitutional where no warrant exception applies

MN: Once blood obtained by SW, second SW not required to search it

After blood was obtained by a search warrant, there was no need for second warrant to search or analyze it. State v. Fawcett, 2016 Minn. App. LEXIS 2 (Jan. 11, 2016). The search of defendant’s house was valid because of … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probable cause, Scope of search, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on MN: Once blood obtained by SW, second SW not required to search it

N.D.Ga.: Where SW issued by video conference, lack of record of conference leaves gov’t with “four corners” of application; no suppression

The state officer here applied for a search warrant by video conference and either email or fax of the documents (the opinion doesn’t say how the judge had them) as permitted under Georgia statute. There was no recording made of … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Where SW issued by video conference, lack of record of conference leaves gov’t with “four corners” of application; no suppression

LA3: Typo in SW could be disregarded where the correct place was searched

The search warrant here used a form off a computer, and the officer forgot to put in the correct address, and the two were 2.69 miles apart. The officers went to the place they intended, not the place specified in … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Warrant execution, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on LA3: Typo in SW could be disregarded where the correct place was searched

N.D.W.Va.: Correcting a date in affidavit for SW in front of USMJ was hardly improper, particularly when the correct date was put in

Three month old information about an IP address in a child pornography case wasn’t stale. Also, the warrant wasn’t issued without probable cause just because the warrant was amended in handwriting before the magistrate, particularly because the correct date was … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Inevitable discovery, Probable cause, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: Correcting a date in affidavit for SW in front of USMJ was hardly improper, particularly when the correct date was put in

CA1: A search warrant presented to a magistrate may be modified before it issues; 4 yr delay in forensic analysis didn’t violate first warrant

A search warrant presented to a magistrate may be modified before it issues. [After all, isn’t that the quintessential “neutral and detached magistrate” providing truly independent review?] Here, electronics were seized, copied, and returned, and there was a four year … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA1: A search warrant presented to a magistrate may be modified before it issues; 4 yr delay in forensic analysis didn’t violate first warrant

TechDirt: Law Enforcement And The Ongoing Inconvenience Of The Fourth Amendment

TechDirt: Law Enforcement And The Ongoing Inconvenience Of The Fourth Amendment by Tim Cushing: The Fourth Amendment somehow still survives, despite the government’s best efforts to dismantle it… or at the very least, ignore it. Law enforcement agencies seemingly have … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on TechDirt: Law Enforcement And The Ongoing Inconvenience Of The Fourth Amendment

D.Utah: Incorporation of affidavit into warrant made it complete

The application for the search warrant listed the statutes of offenses under investigation, but the search warrant did not. The warrant, however, incorporated the application, so the officers knew what they were searching for. “The search warrant here does not … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.Utah: Incorporation of affidavit into warrant made it complete

OH3: A court order issued with PC and otherwise complying with the Fourth Amendment doesn’t have to be called a “search warrant” to be effective

A court ordered GPS device was placed on defendant’s vehicle. His movements watched online and facts the police had learned added up to reasonable suspicion for a stop. [If they had PC for a tracking warrant, why not for the … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on OH3: A court order issued with PC and otherwise complying with the Fourth Amendment doesn’t have to be called a “search warrant” to be effective

TN: A court order for GPS with PC doesn’t have to be a “search warrant” to be valid

The court order for a tracking device (GPS) was based on probable cause. There is no requirement that it be a “search warrant” as long is it is based on probable cause and is issued by a neutral and detached … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on TN: A court order for GPS with PC doesn’t have to be a “search warrant” to be valid

NC: A broken window and screen off is not an exigency without a burglary call or more information

A broken window at a house and a screen leaning against the house without other objective evidence of a break in was not reasonable cause to believe that there was a recent or ongoing burglary to justify a police entry … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on NC: A broken window and screen off is not an exigency without a burglary call or more information

S.D.W.Va.: Lost warrant could be proved by unexecuted copies from the officer’s file

The affidavit and search warrant were lost, but they could be recreated by unexecuted copies from the officer’s file and the associated materials used with them, such as the criminal complaint which used the same information. United States v. Richardson, … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Lost warrant could be proved by unexecuted copies from the officer’s file

MS: Blank space for place to be searched in the SW voided search

The place to be searched in the search warrant was completely blank, and that makes the warrant void under well-settled precedent. $293,720 was seized. State ex rel. Miss. Bureau of Narcotics v. Canada, 2015 Miss. LEXIS 304 (June 4, 2015). … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on MS: Blank space for place to be searched in the SW voided search

NJ: private search doctrine doesn’t give the police the opportunity to do a search of the home without a warrant

The private search doctrine doesn’t give the police the opportunity to do a search of the home without a warrant. State v. Wright, 2015 N.J. LEXIS 549 (May 19, 2015). Syllabus by the court: The third-party intervention or private search … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on NJ: private search doctrine doesn’t give the police the opportunity to do a search of the home without a warrant

IA: Search of guest’s backpack was reasonable when it wasn’t clear whose it was

Officers did not have actual authority to search a guest’s backpack during a consent search, but it wasn’t clear whose backpack it was, so the search here was lawful. State v. Jackson, 2015 Iowa App. LEXIS 400 (May 6, 2015). … Continue reading

Posted in Scope of search, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on IA: Search of guest’s backpack was reasonable when it wasn’t clear whose it was

MA: In a MMJ state, SW for a grow operation must plead PC that target wasn’t a licensed grower

In a medical marijuana state, a search warrant for a grow operation requires the state show that the target of the search is not a licensed grower. Grant of motion to suppress affirmed. Commonwealth v. Canning, SJC-11773 (April 28, 2015): … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on MA: In a MMJ state, SW for a grow operation must plead PC that target wasn’t a licensed grower

DE: Name of owner of property in SW doesn’t need to be identified to be valid

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not challenging that defendant wasn’t named in the search warrant for his specifically described property. [Remember, search warrants are usually for specifically ID’d places, and naming the owner is almost never necessary. If the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on DE: Name of owner of property in SW doesn’t need to be identified to be valid

E.D.Wash.: SW for taking blood presumes that it will be tested, too, and the warrant doesn’t need to specify

A warrant for taking blood presumes that it will be tested, too, and the warrant doesn’t need to specify. A Washington state case saying otherwise is not followed. In any event, it would be in good faith to have tested … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Drug or alcohol testing, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on E.D.Wash.: SW for taking blood presumes that it will be tested, too, and the warrant doesn’t need to specify

NJ: Smell of burnt MJ coming from house isn’t sufficient exigency for warrantless entry

Police received multiple calls, some anonymous, about shots fired, and they were ultimately directed to defendant’s house which they approached from the rear. One caller said a gun was kept in a doghouse, and there were pit bulls in the … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on NJ: Smell of burnt MJ coming from house isn’t sufficient exigency for warrantless entry