Category Archives: Ineffective assistance

D.P.R.: Def’s 2255 claim was based on a fact litigated below and at the trial on the merits; the jury’s determination on credibility can’t be challenged now

In his 2255, defendant claims counsel was ineffective for not moving to suppress on the automobile search or consent search grounds. This was contrary to his defense at trial and the original suppression motion that the officers planted the gun, … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Protective sweep | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Def’s 2255 claim was based on a fact litigated below and at the trial on the merits; the jury’s determination on credibility can’t be challenged now

KS: Def’s stop when she was unconscious in a car was valid as a public safety stop

Defendant was unconscious in a car slumped over at the wheel at 2 am, unresponsive to a spotlight on her. This was valid as a public safety stop. State v. McKenna, 2020 Kan. App. LEXIS 7 (Jan. 31, 2020). “A … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Immigration checkpoints, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on KS: Def’s stop when she was unconscious in a car was valid as a public safety stop

FL5: Appellate counsel in direct appeal was ineffective for not arguing automobile exception wasn’t applicable; if it had been argued, court would have reversed

In defendant’s original appeal, appellate counsel argued only that the search incident doctrine applied and he failed on that issue. On post-conviction, however, new counsel argued that the automobile exception should have been argued and that it did not apply … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on FL5: Appellate counsel in direct appeal was ineffective for not arguing automobile exception wasn’t applicable; if it had been argued, court would have reversed

CA11: No justification is needed for a jail booking strip search

No justification is needed for a jail booking strip search. [The court alludes to what might possibly be some factual justification but doesn’t say that it was.] Watkins v. Pinnock, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 1881 (11th Cir. Jan. 22, 2020). … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on CA11: No justification is needed for a jail booking strip search

OH12: Not challenging reliability of drug dog not IAC without showing result would change

Defendant doesn’t show that the outcome would be different if defense counsel had challenged the certification and reliability of the drug dog. State v. Wash, 2020-Ohio-152, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 131 (12th Dist. Jan. 21, 2020). “Accordingly, the court finds … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH12: Not challenging reliability of drug dog not IAC without showing result would change

M.D.Ala.: No constitutional requirement that the SW be served on the target of the search, so the missing attachment didn’t matter

There is no constitutional requirement that the search warrant be served on the target of the search, so the missing attachment didn’t matter. “As stated above, the record demonstrates with reasonable certainty that a warrant stating with particularity the items … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: No constitutional requirement that the SW be served on the target of the search, so the missing attachment didn’t matter

D.N.J.: What witnesses to call at a suppression hearing is strategic call under Strickland

Defendant wasn’t prejudiced by not calling his codefendant wife at the suppression hearing. Her declaration was already before the court, and nothing more could be added. What witnesses to call, even in a suppression hearing, is a Strickland strategic decision. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on D.N.J.: What witnesses to call at a suppression hearing is strategic call under Strickland

CA11: Two CoAs denied same day

Defendant lost his search issue on appeal. On 2255 he argues that it could have been argued better. [The opinion doesn’t say how.] It he lost on the merits of a Fourth Amendment claim, that’s binding on 2255 for lack … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA11: Two CoAs denied same day

D.Conn.: Allegedly not understanding a potential 4A claim isn’t grounds to set aside plea months later

“On the record before the Court, Mr. Rivera’s belatedly asserted misapprehension regarding possible Fourth Amendment claims does not provide a basis for permitting him to withdraw his guilty plea.” [The court doesn’t even mention the merits of such a motion.] … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Allegedly not understanding a potential 4A claim isn’t grounds to set aside plea months later

CA10: Walking up to def sitting on parked car to talk to him wasn’t a stop

Walking up to defendant sitting on his parked car and talking to him, without blocking the path of the car and no police lights, was not a seizure. State v. McCall, 2020-Ohio-84, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 69 (10th Dist. Jan. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on CA10: Walking up to def sitting on parked car to talk to him wasn’t a stop

D.Minn.: The unusually talkative have no special right to be Mirandized

“Because the officers knew that he had a tendency to talk about the case, Williams-Bey argues, Officer Roddy should have given him his Miranda warnings, rather than entertaining his question. Again, Williams-Bey provides no legal authority to support this contention.” … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Minn.: The unusually talkative have no special right to be Mirandized

E.D.Cal.: Using drug dog in the patrol car didn’t prolong the stop

There was a factual basis for the stop, and the drug dog at hand did not prolong the stop. After the alert, defendant then consented to the search of the vehicle. United States v. Navarro, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3062 … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Using drug dog in the patrol car didn’t prolong the stop

TN: Defense counsel not ineffective for recommending guilty plea where motion to suppress denied and case would have gone to trial on other counts even if granted

Defendant challenges on post-conviction his counsel being ineffective in recommending a guilty plea after the motion to suppress was denied. Even if it had been granted, defendant was going to trial on other counts, and he can’t show that defense … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Standards of review | Comments Off on TN: Defense counsel not ineffective for recommending guilty plea where motion to suppress denied and case would have gone to trial on other counts even if granted

NC: Reasonable force can be used for a DUI blood draw under SW when def refuses

Officers had a search warrant for defendant’s blood while he was in the hospital for an accident. Relying on United States v. Bullock, 71 F.3d 171 (5th Cir. 1995), the court concludes that reasonable force can be used to take … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NC: Reasonable force can be used for a DUI blood draw under SW when def refuses

CA11: Domestic disturbance call with a report of shots fired permitted a warrantless entry and then a protective sweep for victims

A domestic disturbance call with a report of shots fired permitted a warrantless entry and then a protective sweep for victims: “Based on the 911 call reporting gunshots and a domestic disturbance, combined with Peacock’s initial observations upon arriving at … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Knock and talk, Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA11: Domestic disturbance call with a report of shots fired permitted a warrantless entry and then a protective sweep for victims

D.N.J.: Habeas pet’r doesn’t show case outcome would be different if motion to suppress had been litigated

To prevail on a Fourth Amendment IAC claim, there are essentially three things to prove, not just two: (a) defense counsel failed to litigate a search issue (b) that not only would have prevailed on the search issue, (c) but … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Habeas pet’r doesn’t show case outcome would be different if motion to suppress had been litigated

OH8: Malpractice ptf already lost on the merits of Franks claim in direct criminal appeal, defense counsel didn’t commit malpractice handling it

Plaintiff is an inmate pro se pursuing a legal malpractice claim against his criminal defense counsel. The defendant lawyer gets judgment on the pleadings based on the fact the conviction was affirmed on the ground that the defense counsel’s challenge … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on OH8: Malpractice ptf already lost on the merits of Franks claim in direct criminal appeal, defense counsel didn’t commit malpractice handling it

S.D.Ga.: The fact it was ambiguous whether def’s images were CP or not doesn’t nullify PC for the search

It was ambiguous whether the images that officers believed were on defendant’s computer qualified as child pornography, but the question for probable cause is reason to believe and not sufficient evidence to convict. Even so, the good faith exception applies. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: The fact it was ambiguous whether def’s images were CP or not doesn’t nullify PC for the search

CA5: COA previously granted in 2255 appeal is set aside for lack of a “substantial preliminary showing” he could prevail

A judge of the Fifth Circuit granted a certificate of appealability in a 2255 denied by the district court alleging, inter alia, a Fourth Amendment ineffective assistance of counsel claim. The issue was waived by the guilty plea. The COA … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA5: COA previously granted in 2255 appeal is set aside for lack of a “substantial preliminary showing” he could prevail

D.Mont.: Informant hearsay here was adequately corroborated to be found reliable

The informant hearsay here was sufficiently corroborated. “The affidavit provides sufficient grounds to assess the veracity and basis of knowledge of CS1’s information. Most of CS1’s information is based on personal observations of Goodman. Those observations, including Goodman’s involvement with … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Informant hearsay here was adequately corroborated to be found reliable