CA5: COA previously granted in 2255 appeal is set aside for lack of a “substantial preliminary showing” he could prevail

A judge of the Fifth Circuit granted a certificate of appealability in a 2255 denied by the district court alleging, inter alia, a Fourth Amendment ineffective assistance of counsel claim. The issue was waived by the guilty plea. The COA is set aside by a panel for lack of a “substantial preliminary showing” he could prevail on any ground. United States v. Smith, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 37574 (5th Cir. Dec. 18, 2019):*

It is apparent from this record that Smith has not made a substantial showing on the merits of any constitutional claim. Each claim contradicts the sworn testimony he gave during the plea colloquy at his re-arraignment. He testified, among other things, that (1) he was satisfied with the performance of his attorney, (2) he had not been pressured into pleading guilty and was doing so of his own free will, (3) he was waiving his right to proceed by grand jury indictment, (4) he understood the elements of the crimes he was charged with, including the definition of child pornography and the interstate commerce element, (5) these elements were supported by a factual basis, and (6) he was actually guilty of these crimes.

This entry was posted in Ineffective assistance. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.